Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard

This first comprehensive investigation of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles addresses two bathymetrical transects from the intertidal down to subtidal water depths in two different carbonate factories in the Svalbard Archipelago: the bay Mosselbukta and the ocean bank Bjørnøy-Banken. Scannin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Research
Main Authors: Neele Meyer, Max Wisshak, André Freiwald
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v39.3766
https://doaj.org/article/301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54 2023-05-15T15:10:26+02:00 Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard Neele Meyer Max Wisshak André Freiwald 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v39.3766 https://doaj.org/article/301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54 EN eng Norwegian Polar Institute https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/view/3766/11195 https://doaj.org/toc/1751-8369 1751-8369 doi:10.33265/polar.v39.3766 https://doaj.org/article/301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54 Polar Research, Vol 39, Iss 0, Pp 1-18 (2020) bioerosion ichnotaxonomy ichnodisparity arctic mosselbukta bjørnøy-banken Environmental sciences GE1-350 Oceanography GC1-1581 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v39.3766 2022-12-30T23:46:44Z This first comprehensive investigation of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles addresses two bathymetrical transects from the intertidal down to subtidal water depths in two different carbonate factories in the Svalbard Archipelago: the bay Mosselbukta and the ocean bank Bjørnøy-Banken. Scanning electron microscopy of epoxy resin casts of barnacle shells yielded 20 different microendolithic bioerosion traces, probably produced by cyanobacteria (three), chlorophytes (two), rhodophytes (one), sponges (one), foraminifera (three), fungi (nine) and bacteria (one). The lowest ichnodiversity in both locations was observed in the shallow euphotic zone and is likely a result of strong temperature fluctuations, extreme seasonality of light levels and episodic sea-ice cover. At 25–150 m water depth, the ichnodiversity remains relatively constant (9–13 ichnospecies), albeit with differing ichnospecies composition, generally dominated by borings from chlorophytes and fungi. Ichnotaxa at Mosselbukta and Bjørnøy-Banken were similar in numbers but differed in abundance and slightly also in ichnospecies composition. Statistical tests indicate that water depth (affecting the availability of light) is the most significant driver for the development of different microbioerosion trace assemblages across the bathymetrical transects. In contrast, no significant differences in ichnodisparity were found, indicating a comparable suite of architectural designs of the micro-borings throughout bathymetry and location. The comparison of our results with literature data confirms a decrease in ichnodiversity from lower to higher latitudes, although targeted bioerosion analyses from other polar environments are needed to gain a more complete picture of the role of bioerosion in polar carbonate factories. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Foraminifera* Polar Research Sea ice Svalbard Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Svalbard Svalbard Archipelago Banken ENVELOPE(25.108,25.108,70.963,70.963) Mosselbukta ENVELOPE(15.955,15.955,79.891,79.891) Bjørnøy ENVELOPE(18.167,18.167,69.767,69.767) Polar Research 39 0
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic bioerosion
ichnotaxonomy
ichnodisparity
arctic
mosselbukta
bjørnøy-banken
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Oceanography
GC1-1581
spellingShingle bioerosion
ichnotaxonomy
ichnodisparity
arctic
mosselbukta
bjørnøy-banken
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Neele Meyer
Max Wisshak
André Freiwald
Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard
topic_facet bioerosion
ichnotaxonomy
ichnodisparity
arctic
mosselbukta
bjørnøy-banken
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Oceanography
GC1-1581
description This first comprehensive investigation of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles addresses two bathymetrical transects from the intertidal down to subtidal water depths in two different carbonate factories in the Svalbard Archipelago: the bay Mosselbukta and the ocean bank Bjørnøy-Banken. Scanning electron microscopy of epoxy resin casts of barnacle shells yielded 20 different microendolithic bioerosion traces, probably produced by cyanobacteria (three), chlorophytes (two), rhodophytes (one), sponges (one), foraminifera (three), fungi (nine) and bacteria (one). The lowest ichnodiversity in both locations was observed in the shallow euphotic zone and is likely a result of strong temperature fluctuations, extreme seasonality of light levels and episodic sea-ice cover. At 25–150 m water depth, the ichnodiversity remains relatively constant (9–13 ichnospecies), albeit with differing ichnospecies composition, generally dominated by borings from chlorophytes and fungi. Ichnotaxa at Mosselbukta and Bjørnøy-Banken were similar in numbers but differed in abundance and slightly also in ichnospecies composition. Statistical tests indicate that water depth (affecting the availability of light) is the most significant driver for the development of different microbioerosion trace assemblages across the bathymetrical transects. In contrast, no significant differences in ichnodisparity were found, indicating a comparable suite of architectural designs of the micro-borings throughout bathymetry and location. The comparison of our results with literature data confirms a decrease in ichnodiversity from lower to higher latitudes, although targeted bioerosion analyses from other polar environments are needed to gain a more complete picture of the role of bioerosion in polar carbonate factories.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Neele Meyer
Max Wisshak
André Freiwald
author_facet Neele Meyer
Max Wisshak
André Freiwald
author_sort Neele Meyer
title Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard
title_short Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard
title_full Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard
title_fullStr Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard
title_full_unstemmed Ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of Svalbard
title_sort ichnodiversity and bathymetric range of microbioerosion traces in polar barnacles of svalbard
publisher Norwegian Polar Institute
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v39.3766
https://doaj.org/article/301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54
long_lat ENVELOPE(25.108,25.108,70.963,70.963)
ENVELOPE(15.955,15.955,79.891,79.891)
ENVELOPE(18.167,18.167,69.767,69.767)
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
Svalbard Archipelago
Banken
Mosselbukta
Bjørnøy
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
Svalbard Archipelago
Banken
Mosselbukta
Bjørnøy
genre Arctic
Foraminifera*
Polar Research
Sea ice
Svalbard
genre_facet Arctic
Foraminifera*
Polar Research
Sea ice
Svalbard
op_source Polar Research, Vol 39, Iss 0, Pp 1-18 (2020)
op_relation https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/view/3766/11195
https://doaj.org/toc/1751-8369
1751-8369
doi:10.33265/polar.v39.3766
https://doaj.org/article/301363987ab14e6ab30fcc8442953e54
op_doi https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v39.3766
container_title Polar Research
container_volume 39
container_issue 0
_version_ 1766341469459709952