Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?

This paper undertakes to explain the relationship between EU accession and the length of business cycles, focusing specifically on whether participation in a multinational organization has, or has not, altered the length of the cycle. Employing a sample of nine EU countries (Austria, Denmark, Finlan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Panagiotis EVANGELOPOULOS, Dimitrios DAPONTAS
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: General Association of Economists from Romania 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49 2023-05-15T16:51:34+02:00 Has accession to the EU affected business cycles? Panagiotis EVANGELOPOULOS Dimitrios DAPONTAS 2013-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49 EN eng General Association of Economists from Romania http://store.ectap.ro/articole/824.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1841-8678 https://doaj.org/toc/1844-0029 1841-8678 1844-0029 https://doaj.org/article/2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49 Theoretical and Applied Economics, Vol XX, Iss 2, Pp 7-22 (2013) economic integration business cycles European Union Business HF5001-6182 Economic theory. Demography HB1-3840 Economics as a science HB71-74 article 2013 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T08:58:08Z This paper undertakes to explain the relationship between EU accession and the length of business cycles, focusing specifically on whether participation in a multinational organization has, or has not, altered the length of the cycle. Employing a sample of nine EU countries (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK) we focused initially on annual data for per capita growth in GDP over a period of 59 years (1950-2008). For each country the sample was divided into two parts, one covering the period preceding accession to the EU and one is covering the accession year and succeeding years. Then, eliminating the background noise with the use of a periodogram, we proceeded to examine their spectral density plots. The results indicated that in the first years following accession, the countries tended to experience shorter cycles than they had previously. In the second phase the cycles were of the same duration as previous cycles. Finally, after a period of some years, the length of the cycles increased, as suggested by the J-shaped curve. This J-shaped growth curve applies for the countries that have joined the EU, strongly suggesting a causal relationship between accession to the EU and these specific characterristics of the curve. We cross-checked with a set of four non-EU member countries (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey) and found no change in the length of the business cycle in these countries. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic economic integration
business cycles
European Union
Business
HF5001-6182
Economic theory. Demography
HB1-3840
Economics as a science
HB71-74
spellingShingle economic integration
business cycles
European Union
Business
HF5001-6182
Economic theory. Demography
HB1-3840
Economics as a science
HB71-74
Panagiotis EVANGELOPOULOS
Dimitrios DAPONTAS
Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?
topic_facet economic integration
business cycles
European Union
Business
HF5001-6182
Economic theory. Demography
HB1-3840
Economics as a science
HB71-74
description This paper undertakes to explain the relationship between EU accession and the length of business cycles, focusing specifically on whether participation in a multinational organization has, or has not, altered the length of the cycle. Employing a sample of nine EU countries (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK) we focused initially on annual data for per capita growth in GDP over a period of 59 years (1950-2008). For each country the sample was divided into two parts, one covering the period preceding accession to the EU and one is covering the accession year and succeeding years. Then, eliminating the background noise with the use of a periodogram, we proceeded to examine their spectral density plots. The results indicated that in the first years following accession, the countries tended to experience shorter cycles than they had previously. In the second phase the cycles were of the same duration as previous cycles. Finally, after a period of some years, the length of the cycles increased, as suggested by the J-shaped curve. This J-shaped growth curve applies for the countries that have joined the EU, strongly suggesting a causal relationship between accession to the EU and these specific characterristics of the curve. We cross-checked with a set of four non-EU member countries (Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey) and found no change in the length of the business cycle in these countries.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Panagiotis EVANGELOPOULOS
Dimitrios DAPONTAS
author_facet Panagiotis EVANGELOPOULOS
Dimitrios DAPONTAS
author_sort Panagiotis EVANGELOPOULOS
title Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?
title_short Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?
title_full Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?
title_fullStr Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?
title_full_unstemmed Has accession to the EU affected business cycles?
title_sort has accession to the eu affected business cycles?
publisher General Association of Economists from Romania
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Theoretical and Applied Economics, Vol XX, Iss 2, Pp 7-22 (2013)
op_relation http://store.ectap.ro/articole/824.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1841-8678
https://doaj.org/toc/1844-0029
1841-8678
1844-0029
https://doaj.org/article/2f5e28e3493e44c7b1740a7ad2820c49
_version_ 1766041686966796288