Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya

Abstract Background Whilst significant progress has been made in the fight against malaria, vector control continues to rely on just two insecticidal methods, i.e., indoor residual spraying and insecticidal bed nets. House improvement shows great potential to complement these methods and may further...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Malaria Journal
Main Authors: Janneke Snetselaar, Basilio N. Njiru, Beatrice Gachie, Phillip Owigo, Rob Andriessen, Katey Glunt, Anne J. Osinga, James Mutunga, Marit Farenhorst, Bart G. J. Knols
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5
https://doaj.org/article/2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939 2023-05-15T15:18:25+02:00 Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya Janneke Snetselaar Basilio N. Njiru Beatrice Gachie Phillip Owigo Rob Andriessen Katey Glunt Anne J. Osinga James Mutunga Marit Farenhorst Bart G. J. Knols 2017-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5 https://doaj.org/article/2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939 EN eng BMC http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5 https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875 doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5 1475-2875 https://doaj.org/article/2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939 Malaria Journal, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017) Eave tubes Semi-field system House improvement Kenya Anopheles gambiae Anopheles arabiensis Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 Infectious and parasitic diseases RC109-216 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5 2022-12-31T06:01:30Z Abstract Background Whilst significant progress has been made in the fight against malaria, vector control continues to rely on just two insecticidal methods, i.e., indoor residual spraying and insecticidal bed nets. House improvement shows great potential to complement these methods and may further reduce indoor mosquito biting and disease transmission. Open eaves serve as important mosquito house entry points and provide a suitable location for intercepting host-seeking anophelines. This study describes semi-field experiments in western Kenya with eave tubes, a household protection product that leverages the natural behaviour of host-seeking malaria mosquitoes. Methods Semi-field experiments were conducted in two screen-houses. In both of these a typical western Kenyan house, with mud walls and corrugated iron sheet roofing, was built. Eave tubes with bendiocarb- or deltamethrin-treated eave tube inserts were installed in the houses, and the impact on house entry of local strains of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis was determined. Experiments with open eave tubes (no netting) were conducted as a control and to determine house entry through eave tubes. Insecticidal activity of the inserts treated with insecticide was examined using standard 3-min exposure bioassays. Results Experiments with open eave tubes showed that a high percentage of released mosquitoes entered the house through tubes during experimental nights. When tubes were fitted with bendiocarb- or deltamethrin-treated inserts, on average 21% [95% CI 18–25%] and 39% [CI 26–51%] of An. gambiae s.s. were recaptured the following morning, respectively. This contrasts with 71% [CI 60–81%] in the treatment with open eaves and 54% [CI 47–61%] in the treatment where inserts were treated with fluorescent dye powder. For An. arabiensis recapture was 21% [CI 14–27%] and 22% [CI 18–25%], respectively, compared to 46% [CI 40–52%] and 25% [CI 15–35%] in the treatments with open tubes and fluorescent dye. Conclusions Insecticide-treated eave tubes ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Malaria Journal 16 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Eave tubes
Semi-field system
House improvement
Kenya
Anopheles gambiae
Anopheles arabiensis
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Eave tubes
Semi-field system
House improvement
Kenya
Anopheles gambiae
Anopheles arabiensis
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Janneke Snetselaar
Basilio N. Njiru
Beatrice Gachie
Phillip Owigo
Rob Andriessen
Katey Glunt
Anne J. Osinga
James Mutunga
Marit Farenhorst
Bart G. J. Knols
Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya
topic_facet Eave tubes
Semi-field system
House improvement
Kenya
Anopheles gambiae
Anopheles arabiensis
Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
description Abstract Background Whilst significant progress has been made in the fight against malaria, vector control continues to rely on just two insecticidal methods, i.e., indoor residual spraying and insecticidal bed nets. House improvement shows great potential to complement these methods and may further reduce indoor mosquito biting and disease transmission. Open eaves serve as important mosquito house entry points and provide a suitable location for intercepting host-seeking anophelines. This study describes semi-field experiments in western Kenya with eave tubes, a household protection product that leverages the natural behaviour of host-seeking malaria mosquitoes. Methods Semi-field experiments were conducted in two screen-houses. In both of these a typical western Kenyan house, with mud walls and corrugated iron sheet roofing, was built. Eave tubes with bendiocarb- or deltamethrin-treated eave tube inserts were installed in the houses, and the impact on house entry of local strains of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis was determined. Experiments with open eave tubes (no netting) were conducted as a control and to determine house entry through eave tubes. Insecticidal activity of the inserts treated with insecticide was examined using standard 3-min exposure bioassays. Results Experiments with open eave tubes showed that a high percentage of released mosquitoes entered the house through tubes during experimental nights. When tubes were fitted with bendiocarb- or deltamethrin-treated inserts, on average 21% [95% CI 18–25%] and 39% [CI 26–51%] of An. gambiae s.s. were recaptured the following morning, respectively. This contrasts with 71% [CI 60–81%] in the treatment with open eaves and 54% [CI 47–61%] in the treatment where inserts were treated with fluorescent dye powder. For An. arabiensis recapture was 21% [CI 14–27%] and 22% [CI 18–25%], respectively, compared to 46% [CI 40–52%] and 25% [CI 15–35%] in the treatments with open tubes and fluorescent dye. Conclusions Insecticide-treated eave tubes ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Janneke Snetselaar
Basilio N. Njiru
Beatrice Gachie
Phillip Owigo
Rob Andriessen
Katey Glunt
Anne J. Osinga
James Mutunga
Marit Farenhorst
Bart G. J. Knols
author_facet Janneke Snetselaar
Basilio N. Njiru
Beatrice Gachie
Phillip Owigo
Rob Andriessen
Katey Glunt
Anne J. Osinga
James Mutunga
Marit Farenhorst
Bart G. J. Knols
author_sort Janneke Snetselaar
title Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya
title_short Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya
title_full Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya
title_fullStr Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: prototyping and evaluation against Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western Kenya
title_sort eave tubes for malaria control in africa: prototyping and evaluation against anopheles gambiae s.s. and anopheles arabiensis under semi-field conditions in western kenya
publisher BMC
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5
https://doaj.org/article/2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Malaria Journal, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
op_relation http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5
https://doaj.org/toc/1475-2875
doi:10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5
1475-2875
https://doaj.org/article/2d7d77aa48c54dcf888b95e6ffe11939
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1926-5
container_title Malaria Journal
container_volume 16
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766348608731348992