non-metropolitan practices
Every regional center aspires to become (or at least to be called) a capital. Irkutsk is proud of being once an administrative center of a big governorate, which included Alaska. Krasnoyarsk has become a millionaire and now is competing with Novosibirsk for the title of the capital of Siberia. Europ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 https://doaj.org/article/2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 2023-05-15T15:12:17+02:00 non-metropolitan practices Elena Grigoryeva 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 https://doaj.org/article/2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 RU rus Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences http://www.projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/1149 https://doaj.org/toc/2307-4485 https://doaj.org/toc/2309-3072 2307-4485 2309-3072 doi:10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 https://doaj.org/article/2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 Проект Байкал, Vol 14, Iss 52, Pp 1-1 (2017) quality of life non-petropolitan cities architecture town-planning NA1-9428 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 2022-12-31T06:19:08Z Every regional center aspires to become (or at least to be called) a capital. Irkutsk is proud of being once an administrative center of a big governorate, which included Alaska. Krasnoyarsk has become a millionaire and now is competing with Novosibirsk for the title of the capital of Siberia. European cities annually compete for the status of cultural capital, youth capital, etc. Why is the capital status so attractive? It is obvious that Irkutsk is not Moscow, they have different possibilities, and their different budgets lead to different ways of achievement of common goals: to create a comfortable environment and to provide an appropriate quality of life. The main difference is that the decisions made in the capital set models and standards for all non-metropolitan cities. Sometimes standardization based on metropolitan models become unreasonable or too undifferentiated. Where are those climatic regions and subregions elaborated for construction rules and regulations by the regulatory structure of the USSR? Being located in the eleven time zones, from the subtropics to the Arctic, in seismically active zones and on anthropogenic soils, on the shores of three oceans, across deserts and mountain ranges, doesn’t Russia need them? Non-metropolitan practices in architecture, town-planning and the state of life can only “mitigate” the equalitarian impact caused by the capital. What forms and what ideological contents do these practices have all over our multinational and multiconfessional country? How can non-metropolitan architects make their cities healthier, more comfortable and more attractive for the growing human capital assets in the competitive battle against the capital and against each other? As usual, the issue of our journal is full of vital and urgent questions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Alaska Siberia Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
Russian |
topic |
quality of life non-petropolitan cities architecture town-planning NA1-9428 |
spellingShingle |
quality of life non-petropolitan cities architecture town-planning NA1-9428 Elena Grigoryeva non-metropolitan practices |
topic_facet |
quality of life non-petropolitan cities architecture town-planning NA1-9428 |
description |
Every regional center aspires to become (or at least to be called) a capital. Irkutsk is proud of being once an administrative center of a big governorate, which included Alaska. Krasnoyarsk has become a millionaire and now is competing with Novosibirsk for the title of the capital of Siberia. European cities annually compete for the status of cultural capital, youth capital, etc. Why is the capital status so attractive? It is obvious that Irkutsk is not Moscow, they have different possibilities, and their different budgets lead to different ways of achievement of common goals: to create a comfortable environment and to provide an appropriate quality of life. The main difference is that the decisions made in the capital set models and standards for all non-metropolitan cities. Sometimes standardization based on metropolitan models become unreasonable or too undifferentiated. Where are those climatic regions and subregions elaborated for construction rules and regulations by the regulatory structure of the USSR? Being located in the eleven time zones, from the subtropics to the Arctic, in seismically active zones and on anthropogenic soils, on the shores of three oceans, across deserts and mountain ranges, doesn’t Russia need them? Non-metropolitan practices in architecture, town-planning and the state of life can only “mitigate” the equalitarian impact caused by the capital. What forms and what ideological contents do these practices have all over our multinational and multiconfessional country? How can non-metropolitan architects make their cities healthier, more comfortable and more attractive for the growing human capital assets in the competitive battle against the capital and against each other? As usual, the issue of our journal is full of vital and urgent questions. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Elena Grigoryeva |
author_facet |
Elena Grigoryeva |
author_sort |
Elena Grigoryeva |
title |
non-metropolitan practices |
title_short |
non-metropolitan practices |
title_full |
non-metropolitan practices |
title_fullStr |
non-metropolitan practices |
title_full_unstemmed |
non-metropolitan practices |
title_sort |
non-metropolitan practices |
publisher |
Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 https://doaj.org/article/2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic Alaska Siberia |
genre_facet |
Arctic Alaska Siberia |
op_source |
Проект Байкал, Vol 14, Iss 52, Pp 1-1 (2017) |
op_relation |
http://www.projectbaikal.com/index.php/pb/article/view/1149 https://doaj.org/toc/2307-4485 https://doaj.org/toc/2309-3072 2307-4485 2309-3072 doi:10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 https://doaj.org/article/2c352a1ecca044c288c37e5ad3a218f2 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.52.1149 |
_version_ |
1766342982817021952 |