Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites

Computing a better crustal thickness model is still a necessary improvement in Antarctica. In this remote continent where almost all the bedrock is covered by the ice sheet, seismic investigations do not reach a sufficient spatial resolution for geological and geophysical purposes. Here, we present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solid Earth
Main Authors: M. Llubes, L. Seoane, S. Bruinsma, F. Rémy
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-457-2018
https://doaj.org/article/293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013 2023-05-15T13:33:51+02:00 Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites M. Llubes L. Seoane S. Bruinsma F. Rémy 2018-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-457-2018 https://doaj.org/article/293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.solid-earth.net/9/457/2018/se-9-457-2018.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1869-9510 https://doaj.org/toc/1869-9529 doi:10.5194/se-9-457-2018 1869-9510 1869-9529 https://doaj.org/article/293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013 Solid Earth, Vol 9, Pp 457-467 (2018) Geology QE1-996.5 Stratigraphy QE640-699 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-457-2018 2022-12-31T01:02:28Z Computing a better crustal thickness model is still a necessary improvement in Antarctica. In this remote continent where almost all the bedrock is covered by the ice sheet, seismic investigations do not reach a sufficient spatial resolution for geological and geophysical purposes. Here, we present a global map of Antarctic crustal thickness computed from space gravity observations. The DIR5 gravity field model, built from GOCE and GRACE gravimetric data, is inverted with the Parker–Oldenburg iterative algorithm. The BEDMAP products are used to estimate the gravity effect of the ice and the rocky surface. Our result is compared to crustal thickness calculated from seismological studies and the CRUST1.0 and AN1 models. Although the CRUST1.0 model shows a very good agreement with ours, its spatial resolution is larger than the one we obtain with gravimetric data. Finally, we compute a model in which the crust–mantle density contrast is adjusted to fit the Moho depth from the CRUST1.0 model. In East Antarctica, the resulting density contrast clearly shows higher values than in West Antarctica. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica East Antarctica Ice Sheet West Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Antarctic East Antarctica West Antarctica Oldenburg Solid Earth 9 2 457 467
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geology
QE1-996.5
Stratigraphy
QE640-699
spellingShingle Geology
QE1-996.5
Stratigraphy
QE640-699
M. Llubes
L. Seoane
S. Bruinsma
F. Rémy
Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
topic_facet Geology
QE1-996.5
Stratigraphy
QE640-699
description Computing a better crustal thickness model is still a necessary improvement in Antarctica. In this remote continent where almost all the bedrock is covered by the ice sheet, seismic investigations do not reach a sufficient spatial resolution for geological and geophysical purposes. Here, we present a global map of Antarctic crustal thickness computed from space gravity observations. The DIR5 gravity field model, built from GOCE and GRACE gravimetric data, is inverted with the Parker–Oldenburg iterative algorithm. The BEDMAP products are used to estimate the gravity effect of the ice and the rocky surface. Our result is compared to crustal thickness calculated from seismological studies and the CRUST1.0 and AN1 models. Although the CRUST1.0 model shows a very good agreement with ours, its spatial resolution is larger than the one we obtain with gravimetric data. Finally, we compute a model in which the crust–mantle density contrast is adjusted to fit the Moho depth from the CRUST1.0 model. In East Antarctica, the resulting density contrast clearly shows higher values than in West Antarctica.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author M. Llubes
L. Seoane
S. Bruinsma
F. Rémy
author_facet M. Llubes
L. Seoane
S. Bruinsma
F. Rémy
author_sort M. Llubes
title Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
title_short Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
title_full Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
title_fullStr Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
title_full_unstemmed Crustal thickness of Antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
title_sort crustal thickness of antarctica estimated using data from gravimetric satellites
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-457-2018
https://doaj.org/article/293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013
geographic Antarctic
East Antarctica
West Antarctica
Oldenburg
geographic_facet Antarctic
East Antarctica
West Antarctica
Oldenburg
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
West Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
West Antarctica
op_source Solid Earth, Vol 9, Pp 457-467 (2018)
op_relation https://www.solid-earth.net/9/457/2018/se-9-457-2018.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1869-9510
https://doaj.org/toc/1869-9529
doi:10.5194/se-9-457-2018
1869-9510
1869-9529
https://doaj.org/article/293c65615b7446a78891e285f3eb0013
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-457-2018
container_title Solid Earth
container_volume 9
container_issue 2
container_start_page 457
op_container_end_page 467
_version_ 1766046536074002432