What do we know about health-related knowledge translation in the Circumpolar North? Results from a scoping review

• Published in: International Journal of Circumpolar Health
• Main Authors: M. Ellen McDonald, Andrew Papadopoulos, Victoria L. Edge, James Ford, Alison Sumner, Sherilee L. Harper
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016
• Subjects: Inuit; Circumpolar North; knowledge translation; knowledge transfer; knowledge exchange; dissemination; results sharing; health; public health messaging; scoping review; Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine; RC955-962; Arctic; Circumpolar Health; Human health; International Journal of Circumpolar Health; inuit
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31223; https://doaj.org/article/2404b2d4c0344c2a9a815f924dd8b05d

Background: Health research knowledge translation (KT) is important to improve population health outcomes. Considering social, geographical and cultural contexts, KT in Inuit communities often requires different methods than those commonly used in non-Inuit populations. Objectives: To examine the extent, range and nature of literature about health-related KT in Inuit communities. Design: A scoping review was conducted. A search string was used to search 2 English aggregator databases, ProQuest and EBSCOhost, on 12 March 2015. Study selection was conducted by 2 independent reviewers using inclusion and exclusion criteria. To be included, studies had to explicitly state that KT approaches were used to share human health research results in Inuit communities in the Circumpolar North. Articles that evaluated or assessed KT approaches were thematically analysed to identify and characterize elements that contributed to KT success or challenges. Results: From 680 unique records identified in the initial search, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Of these 39 articles, 17 evaluated the KT approach used; thematic analysis identified 3 themes within these 17 articles: the value of community stakeholders as active members in the research process; the importance of local context in tailoring KT strategies and messaging; and the challenges with varying and contradictory health messaging in KT. A crosscutting gap in the literature, however, included a lack of critical assessment of community involvement in research. The review also identified a gap in assessments of KT in the literature. Research primarily focused on whether KT methods reflected the local culture and needs of the community. Assessments rarely focused on whether KT had successfully elicited its intended action. Conclusions: This review synthesized a small but burgeoning area of research. Community engagement was important for successful KT; however, more discussion and discourse on the tensions, challenges and opportunities for ...