Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint

Human activities have impacted 77% of the terrestrial ecosystems (excluding Antarctica), and the remaining areas are becoming increasingly endangered. Mapping spatiotemporal dynamics of Human Footprint has been used to evaluate the cumulative interference on terrestrial environments globally. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geography and Sustainability
Main Authors: Jian Sun, Isabel C. Barrio
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002
https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 2023-11-12T04:06:34+01:00 Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint Jian Sun Isabel C. Barrio 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000482 https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6839 2666-6839 doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 Geography and Sustainability, Vol 4, Iss 4, Pp 340-342 (2023) Global observation network Spatiotemporal dynamics Fences Hydropower Human Footprint Geography (General) G1-922 Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 2023-10-29T00:38:46Z Human activities have impacted 77% of the terrestrial ecosystems (excluding Antarctica), and the remaining areas are becoming increasingly endangered. Mapping spatiotemporal dynamics of Human Footprint has been used to evaluate the cumulative interference on terrestrial environments globally. However, fences and hydropower, two widespread and rapidly expanding infrastructures, have not been considered regarding Human Footprint, despite their complicated and extensive effects on ecosystem functioning and species survival. Previous work has proved that fences increase habitat fragmentation, disrupt migratory routes, inadvertently trap and kill wildlife, and hinder genetic exchange. Hydropower construction also caused habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation. These impacts have received global concern, but fences around the world are difficult to be detected due to the limitations of current cartographic technologies. Furthermore, the effect of hydropower on the terrestrial environment has been underestimated, making the research on this topic at a global scale still in its infancy. Therefore, building an observation network of global fences and hydropower is a necessary step to move forward in the assessment of the impact of human activities on our planet, but also to better provide scientific support for policy-making regarding global biodiversity conservation, the identification of protected areas, and the prioritization of ecological restoration areas. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geography and Sustainability 4 4 340 342
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Global observation network
Spatiotemporal dynamics
Fences
Hydropower
Human Footprint
Geography (General)
G1-922
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Global observation network
Spatiotemporal dynamics
Fences
Hydropower
Human Footprint
Geography (General)
G1-922
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Jian Sun
Isabel C. Barrio
Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
topic_facet Global observation network
Spatiotemporal dynamics
Fences
Hydropower
Human Footprint
Geography (General)
G1-922
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description Human activities have impacted 77% of the terrestrial ecosystems (excluding Antarctica), and the remaining areas are becoming increasingly endangered. Mapping spatiotemporal dynamics of Human Footprint has been used to evaluate the cumulative interference on terrestrial environments globally. However, fences and hydropower, two widespread and rapidly expanding infrastructures, have not been considered regarding Human Footprint, despite their complicated and extensive effects on ecosystem functioning and species survival. Previous work has proved that fences increase habitat fragmentation, disrupt migratory routes, inadvertently trap and kill wildlife, and hinder genetic exchange. Hydropower construction also caused habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation. These impacts have received global concern, but fences around the world are difficult to be detected due to the limitations of current cartographic technologies. Furthermore, the effect of hydropower on the terrestrial environment has been underestimated, making the research on this topic at a global scale still in its infancy. Therefore, building an observation network of global fences and hydropower is a necessary step to move forward in the assessment of the impact of human activities on our planet, but also to better provide scientific support for policy-making regarding global biodiversity conservation, the identification of protected areas, and the prioritization of ecological restoration areas.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jian Sun
Isabel C. Barrio
author_facet Jian Sun
Isabel C. Barrio
author_sort Jian Sun
title Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
title_short Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
title_full Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
title_fullStr Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
title_full_unstemmed Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
title_sort fences and hydropower: important but overlooked human footprint
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002
https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Geography and Sustainability, Vol 4, Iss 4, Pp 340-342 (2023)
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000482
https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6839
2666-6839
doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002
https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002
container_title Geography and Sustainability
container_volume 4
container_issue 4
container_start_page 340
op_container_end_page 342
_version_ 1782327665693294592