Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint
Human activities have impacted 77% of the terrestrial ecosystems (excluding Antarctica), and the remaining areas are becoming increasingly endangered. Mapping spatiotemporal dynamics of Human Footprint has been used to evaluate the cumulative interference on terrestrial environments globally. Howeve...
Published in: | Geography and Sustainability |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 2023-11-12T04:06:34+01:00 Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint Jian Sun Isabel C. Barrio 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000482 https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6839 2666-6839 doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 Geography and Sustainability, Vol 4, Iss 4, Pp 340-342 (2023) Global observation network Spatiotemporal dynamics Fences Hydropower Human Footprint Geography (General) G1-922 Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 2023-10-29T00:38:46Z Human activities have impacted 77% of the terrestrial ecosystems (excluding Antarctica), and the remaining areas are becoming increasingly endangered. Mapping spatiotemporal dynamics of Human Footprint has been used to evaluate the cumulative interference on terrestrial environments globally. However, fences and hydropower, two widespread and rapidly expanding infrastructures, have not been considered regarding Human Footprint, despite their complicated and extensive effects on ecosystem functioning and species survival. Previous work has proved that fences increase habitat fragmentation, disrupt migratory routes, inadvertently trap and kill wildlife, and hinder genetic exchange. Hydropower construction also caused habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation. These impacts have received global concern, but fences around the world are difficult to be detected due to the limitations of current cartographic technologies. Furthermore, the effect of hydropower on the terrestrial environment has been underestimated, making the research on this topic at a global scale still in its infancy. Therefore, building an observation network of global fences and hydropower is a necessary step to move forward in the assessment of the impact of human activities on our planet, but also to better provide scientific support for policy-making regarding global biodiversity conservation, the identification of protected areas, and the prioritization of ecological restoration areas. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geography and Sustainability 4 4 340 342 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Global observation network Spatiotemporal dynamics Fences Hydropower Human Footprint Geography (General) G1-922 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
Global observation network Spatiotemporal dynamics Fences Hydropower Human Footprint Geography (General) G1-922 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Jian Sun Isabel C. Barrio Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint |
topic_facet |
Global observation network Spatiotemporal dynamics Fences Hydropower Human Footprint Geography (General) G1-922 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
description |
Human activities have impacted 77% of the terrestrial ecosystems (excluding Antarctica), and the remaining areas are becoming increasingly endangered. Mapping spatiotemporal dynamics of Human Footprint has been used to evaluate the cumulative interference on terrestrial environments globally. However, fences and hydropower, two widespread and rapidly expanding infrastructures, have not been considered regarding Human Footprint, despite their complicated and extensive effects on ecosystem functioning and species survival. Previous work has proved that fences increase habitat fragmentation, disrupt migratory routes, inadvertently trap and kill wildlife, and hinder genetic exchange. Hydropower construction also caused habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation. These impacts have received global concern, but fences around the world are difficult to be detected due to the limitations of current cartographic technologies. Furthermore, the effect of hydropower on the terrestrial environment has been underestimated, making the research on this topic at a global scale still in its infancy. Therefore, building an observation network of global fences and hydropower is a necessary step to move forward in the assessment of the impact of human activities on our planet, but also to better provide scientific support for policy-making regarding global biodiversity conservation, the identification of protected areas, and the prioritization of ecological restoration areas. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Jian Sun Isabel C. Barrio |
author_facet |
Jian Sun Isabel C. Barrio |
author_sort |
Jian Sun |
title |
Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint |
title_short |
Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint |
title_full |
Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint |
title_fullStr |
Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fences and hydropower: Important but overlooked Human Footprint |
title_sort |
fences and hydropower: important but overlooked human footprint |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctica |
op_source |
Geography and Sustainability, Vol 4, Iss 4, Pp 340-342 (2023) |
op_relation |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683923000482 https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6839 2666-6839 doi:10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 https://doaj.org/article/23e26c48b19b4bac90f5046dad73cda9 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.08.002 |
container_title |
Geography and Sustainability |
container_volume |
4 |
container_issue |
4 |
container_start_page |
340 |
op_container_end_page |
342 |
_version_ |
1782327665693294592 |