Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters

Abstract Complex interactions between protected populations may challenge the recovery of whole ecosystems. In California, white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) mistargeting southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) are an emergent impact to sea otter recovery, inhibiting the broader ecosystem res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Jerry H. Moxley, Teri E. Nicholson, Kyle S. Van Houtan, Salvador J. Jorgensen
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209
https://doaj.org/article/227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c 2023-05-15T16:05:18+02:00 Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters Jerry H. Moxley Teri E. Nicholson Kyle S. Van Houtan Salvador J. Jorgensen 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209 https://doaj.org/article/227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209 https://doaj.org/toc/2045-7758 2045-7758 doi:10.1002/ece3.5209 https://doaj.org/article/227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c Ecology and Evolution, Vol 9, Iss 11, Pp 6378-6388 (2019) community structure complex interactions nonconsumptive effects prey mistargeting protected species Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209 2022-12-31T15:32:45Z Abstract Complex interactions between protected populations may challenge the recovery of whole ecosystems. In California, white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) mistargeting southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) are an emergent impact to sea otter recovery, inhibiting the broader ecosystem restoration sea otters might provide. Here, we integrate and analyze tracking and stranding data to compare the phenology of interactions between white sharks and their targeted prey (elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris) with those of mistargeted prey (sea otters, humans). Pronounced seasonal peaks in shark bites to otters and humans overlap in the late boreal summer, immediately before the annual adult white shark migration to elephant seal rookeries. From 1997 to 2017, the seasonal period when sharks bite otters expanded from 2 to 8 months of the year and occurred primarily in regions where kelp cover declined. Immature and male otters, demographics most associated with range expansion, were disproportionately impacted. While sea otters are understood to play a keystone role in kelp forests, recent ecosystem shifts are revealing unprecedented bottom‐up and top‐down interactions. Such shifts challenge ecosystem management programs that rely on static models of species interactions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Elephant Seal Elephant Seals Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Ecology and Evolution 9 11 6378 6388
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic community structure
complex interactions
nonconsumptive effects
prey mistargeting
protected species
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle community structure
complex interactions
nonconsumptive effects
prey mistargeting
protected species
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Jerry H. Moxley
Teri E. Nicholson
Kyle S. Van Houtan
Salvador J. Jorgensen
Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
topic_facet community structure
complex interactions
nonconsumptive effects
prey mistargeting
protected species
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description Abstract Complex interactions between protected populations may challenge the recovery of whole ecosystems. In California, white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) mistargeting southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) are an emergent impact to sea otter recovery, inhibiting the broader ecosystem restoration sea otters might provide. Here, we integrate and analyze tracking and stranding data to compare the phenology of interactions between white sharks and their targeted prey (elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris) with those of mistargeted prey (sea otters, humans). Pronounced seasonal peaks in shark bites to otters and humans overlap in the late boreal summer, immediately before the annual adult white shark migration to elephant seal rookeries. From 1997 to 2017, the seasonal period when sharks bite otters expanded from 2 to 8 months of the year and occurred primarily in regions where kelp cover declined. Immature and male otters, demographics most associated with range expansion, were disproportionately impacted. While sea otters are understood to play a keystone role in kelp forests, recent ecosystem shifts are revealing unprecedented bottom‐up and top‐down interactions. Such shifts challenge ecosystem management programs that rely on static models of species interactions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jerry H. Moxley
Teri E. Nicholson
Kyle S. Van Houtan
Salvador J. Jorgensen
author_facet Jerry H. Moxley
Teri E. Nicholson
Kyle S. Van Houtan
Salvador J. Jorgensen
author_sort Jerry H. Moxley
title Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
title_short Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
title_full Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
title_fullStr Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
title_full_unstemmed Non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
title_sort non‐trophic impacts from white sharks complicate population recovery for sea otters
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209
https://doaj.org/article/227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c
genre Elephant Seal
Elephant Seals
genre_facet Elephant Seal
Elephant Seals
op_source Ecology and Evolution, Vol 9, Iss 11, Pp 6378-6388 (2019)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209
https://doaj.org/toc/2045-7758
2045-7758
doi:10.1002/ece3.5209
https://doaj.org/article/227d69584f074e2db5116d023604081c
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5209
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
container_issue 11
container_start_page 6378
op_container_end_page 6388
_version_ 1766401208366399488