Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead

The Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead (CBP) are major, predictable habitat features with ≤15% ice cover in an otherwise ice-covered Beaufort Sea, and thought to provide hunting opportunities for polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps, 1774). We assessed 78 adult (female; with and without cubs) and su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Erin M. Henderson, Andrew E. Derocher
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0023
https://doaj.org/article/218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12 2023-05-15T14:23:47+02:00 Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead Erin M. Henderson Andrew E. Derocher 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0023 https://doaj.org/article/218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12 EN FR eng fre Canadian Science Publishing https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/as-2021-0023 https://doaj.org/toc/2368-7460 doi:10.1139/as-2021-0023 2368-7460 https://doaj.org/article/218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12 Arctic Science, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 395-413 (2022) Cape Bathurst polynya flaw lead Ursus maritimus Beaufort Sea first passage time polynie du Cap Bathurst Environmental sciences GE1-350 Environmental engineering TA170-171 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0023 2022-12-30T22:56:53Z The Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead (CBP) are major, predictable habitat features with ≤15% ice cover in an otherwise ice-covered Beaufort Sea, and thought to provide hunting opportunities for polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps, 1774). We assessed 78 adult (female; with and without cubs) and subadult (male and female) polar bears’ use of the CBP from October to June 2007–2014. The CBP was up to 725 km wide in autumn, ice-covered in winter, and <306 km wide in spring. Seventy-nine percent (n = 62) of the bears used the CBP (≥1 location <2.4 km, or one 4 h step length, from the CBP). Use was higher for solitary adult females and subadult males, which travelled faster with low turning angles along wider sections than females with offspring and subadult females. Bears were closest to the CBP during the spring hyperphagia season. Although a wider CBP did not prevent crossing, bears primarily crossed from the coast towards pack ice at locations 53% narrower than areas not crossed. Bears might avoid crossing when it would require a long-distance swim. The CBP affects polar bear ecology by providing hunting habitat and a corridor that could increase prey encounters but may affect movement. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Beaufort Sea Ursus maritimus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Cape Bathurst ENVELOPE(-128.068,-128.068,70.579,70.579) Arctic Science 1 19
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic Cape Bathurst polynya
flaw lead
Ursus maritimus
Beaufort Sea
first passage time
polynie du Cap Bathurst
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
spellingShingle Cape Bathurst polynya
flaw lead
Ursus maritimus
Beaufort Sea
first passage time
polynie du Cap Bathurst
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
Erin M. Henderson
Andrew E. Derocher
Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead
topic_facet Cape Bathurst polynya
flaw lead
Ursus maritimus
Beaufort Sea
first passage time
polynie du Cap Bathurst
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental engineering
TA170-171
description The Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead (CBP) are major, predictable habitat features with ≤15% ice cover in an otherwise ice-covered Beaufort Sea, and thought to provide hunting opportunities for polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps, 1774). We assessed 78 adult (female; with and without cubs) and subadult (male and female) polar bears’ use of the CBP from October to June 2007–2014. The CBP was up to 725 km wide in autumn, ice-covered in winter, and <306 km wide in spring. Seventy-nine percent (n = 62) of the bears used the CBP (≥1 location <2.4 km, or one 4 h step length, from the CBP). Use was higher for solitary adult females and subadult males, which travelled faster with low turning angles along wider sections than females with offspring and subadult females. Bears were closest to the CBP during the spring hyperphagia season. Although a wider CBP did not prevent crossing, bears primarily crossed from the coast towards pack ice at locations 53% narrower than areas not crossed. Bears might avoid crossing when it would require a long-distance swim. The CBP affects polar bear ecology by providing hunting habitat and a corridor that could increase prey encounters but may affect movement.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Erin M. Henderson
Andrew E. Derocher
author_facet Erin M. Henderson
Andrew E. Derocher
author_sort Erin M. Henderson
title Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead
title_short Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead
title_full Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead
title_fullStr Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead
title_full_unstemmed Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) use of the Cape Bathurst polynya and flaw lead
title_sort polar bear (ursus maritimus) use of the cape bathurst polynya and flaw lead
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0023
https://doaj.org/article/218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12
long_lat ENVELOPE(-128.068,-128.068,70.579,70.579)
geographic Cape Bathurst
geographic_facet Cape Bathurst
genre Arctic
Beaufort Sea
Ursus maritimus
genre_facet Arctic
Beaufort Sea
Ursus maritimus
op_source Arctic Science, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 395-413 (2022)
op_relation https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/as-2021-0023
https://doaj.org/toc/2368-7460
doi:10.1139/as-2021-0023
2368-7460
https://doaj.org/article/218c85b72e2748f2877e318de8dbbc12
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0023
container_title Arctic Science
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 19
_version_ 1766296276886880256