Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses

In this article we analyse factors that help interpret silence and speaking in different cultures. Economic activities and lifestyle related to natural conditions as well as beliefs are crucial here. In terms of speaking and silence, a relatively good distinction can be made between peoples traditio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mäetagused
Main Authors: Madis Arukask, Eva Saar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:Estonian
Published: Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar
https://doaj.org/article/20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692 2023-05-15T17:40:40+02:00 Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses Madis Arukask Eva Saar 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar https://doaj.org/article/20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692 ET est Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr77/arukask_saar.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1406-992X https://doaj.org/toc/1406-9938 doi:10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar 1406-992X 1406-9938 https://doaj.org/article/20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692 Mäetagused, Vol 77, Pp 89-116 (2020) animism cultural differences fieldwork politeness silence speech acts veps Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology GN301-674 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar 2022-12-31T00:29:41Z In this article we analyse factors that help interpret silence and speaking in different cultures. Economic activities and lifestyle related to natural conditions as well as beliefs are crucial here. In terms of speaking and silence, a relatively good distinction can be made between peoples traditionally engaged in hunting-gathering and agriculture, and the modern Western code of communication that has developed from the latter. The modern code does not tolerate silence and non-speaking very well, considering it either as expression of impoliteness, stupidity or lack of sincerity. For indigenous peoples silence clearly has a magical function in order not to be threatened by ambivalent animistic agents. This also explains the greater carefulness of indigenous peoples in expressing their emotions. For the same reason, in animistic cultures, which are not so human-centred, the usual communication situations (meetings, departures, making compliments) and the corresponding speech acts are very diffuse, minimalist or non-existent. In (monotheistic) agricultural cultures the sphere of spirit beings has generally been demonized, and the norm of silent behaviour that reflects it has become incomprehensible or interpreted as inappropriate. The Veps living in north-western Russia have been in close contact with Russian peasant culture for more than 1,000 years. The relatively emotional and speech-oriented Russian culture has undoubtedly had an impact on the Veps. On the other hand, the Finno-Ugric animistic norm and the corresponding tendency to speak less or remain silent can be perceived. It also seems that from Russians the Veps have acquired speech acts used at meetings and departures – greetings, farewells, blessings, formulas that close and delimit situations, and so on. The corresponding words and phrases taken from Russian also refer to borrowing. Because of the Russian influence the interpersonal relations of the Veps are not that diffuse as those of the non-agricultural indigenous peoples. Nevertheless, as the ... Article in Journal/Newspaper North-Western Russia Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Mäetagused 77 89 116
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language Estonian
topic animism
cultural differences
fieldwork
politeness
silence
speech acts
veps
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
spellingShingle animism
cultural differences
fieldwork
politeness
silence
speech acts
veps
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
Madis Arukask
Eva Saar
Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
topic_facet animism
cultural differences
fieldwork
politeness
silence
speech acts
veps
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
description In this article we analyse factors that help interpret silence and speaking in different cultures. Economic activities and lifestyle related to natural conditions as well as beliefs are crucial here. In terms of speaking and silence, a relatively good distinction can be made between peoples traditionally engaged in hunting-gathering and agriculture, and the modern Western code of communication that has developed from the latter. The modern code does not tolerate silence and non-speaking very well, considering it either as expression of impoliteness, stupidity or lack of sincerity. For indigenous peoples silence clearly has a magical function in order not to be threatened by ambivalent animistic agents. This also explains the greater carefulness of indigenous peoples in expressing their emotions. For the same reason, in animistic cultures, which are not so human-centred, the usual communication situations (meetings, departures, making compliments) and the corresponding speech acts are very diffuse, minimalist or non-existent. In (monotheistic) agricultural cultures the sphere of spirit beings has generally been demonized, and the norm of silent behaviour that reflects it has become incomprehensible or interpreted as inappropriate. The Veps living in north-western Russia have been in close contact with Russian peasant culture for more than 1,000 years. The relatively emotional and speech-oriented Russian culture has undoubtedly had an impact on the Veps. On the other hand, the Finno-Ugric animistic norm and the corresponding tendency to speak less or remain silent can be perceived. It also seems that from Russians the Veps have acquired speech acts used at meetings and departures – greetings, farewells, blessings, formulas that close and delimit situations, and so on. The corresponding words and phrases taken from Russian also refer to borrowing. Because of the Russian influence the interpersonal relations of the Veps are not that diffuse as those of the non-agricultural indigenous peoples. Nevertheless, as the ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Madis Arukask
Eva Saar
author_facet Madis Arukask
Eva Saar
author_sort Madis Arukask
title Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
title_short Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
title_full Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
title_fullStr Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
title_full_unstemmed Vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
title_sort vaikimine, rääkimine ja muud traditsioonilised kõneteod vepsa rahvakultuuris kultuuridevahelises võrdluses
publisher Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar
https://doaj.org/article/20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692
genre North-Western Russia
genre_facet North-Western Russia
op_source Mäetagused, Vol 77, Pp 89-116 (2020)
op_relation http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr77/arukask_saar.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1406-992X
https://doaj.org/toc/1406-9938
doi:10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar
1406-992X
1406-9938
https://doaj.org/article/20586b5ac4e149c7a39a535a3ea65692
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7592/MT2020.77.arukask_saar
container_title Mäetagused
container_volume 77
container_start_page 89
op_container_end_page 116
_version_ 1766141635374088192