Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy

Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elinor Sloan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 2023-08-27T04:08:12+02:00 Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy Elinor Sloan 2014-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 EN eng University of Calgary https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320 2560-8312 2560-8320 https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 7 (2014) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 article 2014 ftdoajarticles 2023-08-06T00:34:45Z Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment. A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
spellingShingle Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Elinor Sloan
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
topic_facet Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
description Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment. A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Elinor Sloan
author_facet Elinor Sloan
author_sort Elinor Sloan
title Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_short Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_full Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_fullStr Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
title_sort something has to give: why delays are the new reality of canada’s defence procurement strategy
publisher University of Calgary
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02
geographic Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 7 (2014)
op_relation https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485
https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312
https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320
2560-8312
2560-8320
https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02
_version_ 1775348905639149568