Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy
Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Calgary
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 2023-08-27T04:08:12+02:00 Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy Elinor Sloan 2014-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 EN eng University of Calgary https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320 2560-8312 2560-8320 https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 7 (2014) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 article 2014 ftdoajarticles 2023-08-06T00:34:45Z Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment. A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Canada |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 |
spellingShingle |
Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Elinor Sloan Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy |
topic_facet |
Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 |
description |
Recent waves of political controversy over military procurement programs, most notably the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter project, are symptoms of an ongoing and increasingly strategic choice Canada is making in the way it equips its military. From the failure to settle on a design for the Arctic/Offshore Patrol Ship (which had an originally planned delivery date of 2013), to the un-awarded contracts for new fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft (initially anticipated nearly a decade ago) and the incomplete Integrated Soldier-System Project (once expected to be active by this year); to the delay in cutting the steel for the Joint Support Ship (initial delivery planned for 2012) needed to replace vessels that are now being decommissioned, Canadians are witnessing the results of a new philosophy behind the government’s procurement process. Canadian governments have always insisted on industrial and regional benefits for Canada when buying military equipment. But the massive defence spending promised under the 2008 Canada First Defence Strategy exacerbated this approach. The emphasis has now formally been placed on favouring industrial benefits for Canada in defence acquisitions, while heightened political cautiousness has placed a higher priority on ensuring maximum value for taxpayer money with a zero tolerance for mistakes environment. A relatively small Canadian defence budget has put pressure on military officials to be creative about ordering new equipment — in some cases, perhaps too creative. Officials have taken to commissioning vehicles and equipment that are more versatile and are capable of carrying out more than their traditional functions. In certain instances, this has meant wish lists that cannot be fulfilled in the expected time frame, or even at all. This is the case, for example, with the Joint Support Ship, which went from a plan for new refuelling and replenishment ships to one for vessels that could also provide a command and control centre for forces ashore and sealift for ground forces, including ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Elinor Sloan |
author_facet |
Elinor Sloan |
author_sort |
Elinor Sloan |
title |
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy |
title_short |
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy |
title_full |
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy |
title_fullStr |
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Something Has to Give: Why Delays Are the New Reality of Canada’s Defence Procurement Strategy |
title_sort |
something has to give: why delays are the new reality of canada’s defence procurement strategy |
publisher |
University of Calgary |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 |
geographic |
Arctic Canada |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Canada |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 7 (2014) |
op_relation |
https://dev.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/42485 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320 2560-8312 2560-8320 https://doaj.org/article/1f59c2b10dbf4259a172df73d9e63c02 |
_version_ |
1775348905639149568 |