Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats

1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animals
Main Authors: Domhnall Finch, Henry Schofield, Fiona Mathews
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
https://doaj.org/article/1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e 2023-05-15T17:48:37+02:00 Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats Domhnall Finch Henry Schofield Fiona Mathews 2020-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856 https://doaj.org/article/1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/10/1856 https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615 doi:10.3390/ani10101856 2076-2615 https://doaj.org/article/1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e Animals, Vol 10, Iss 1856, p 1856 (2020) agriculture agri-environmental scheme bats connectivity fragmentation habitat degradation Veterinary medicine SF600-1100 Zoology QL1-991 article 2020 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856 2022-12-31T10:01:33Z 1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors were placed in the centre of agricultural fields (arable and pasture) and along linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). 3. Our results show that all 10 of the bat species groups identified were found both along linear features and in the middle of agricultural fields. Of the five species groups analysed further, all had significantly more bat activity along linear features compared to the middle of fields, except for Nyctalus noctula . However, our results showed that 29% of calls from Rhinolophus ferrumequinum were recorded in the middle of agricultural fields, compared to only 10% for Pipistrellus pipistrellus . Bat activity was more likely to be associated with treelines compared to other linear feature types. 4. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments. Article in Journal/Newspaper Nyctalus noctula Pipistrellus pipistrellus Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Animals 10 10 1856
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic agriculture
agri-environmental scheme
bats
connectivity
fragmentation
habitat degradation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
spellingShingle agriculture
agri-environmental scheme
bats
connectivity
fragmentation
habitat degradation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
Domhnall Finch
Henry Schofield
Fiona Mathews
Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
topic_facet agriculture
agri-environmental scheme
bats
connectivity
fragmentation
habitat degradation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
description 1. Bats are important components of agricultural ecosystems. However, little is known about the extent to which bats use linear features when foraging and commuting in agricultural settings, when compared to the interior of fields. 2. As part of a large-scale citizen science project, bat detectors were placed in the centre of agricultural fields (arable and pasture) and along linear features (intensively managed hedgerows, sympathetically managed hedgerows and treelines). 3. Our results show that all 10 of the bat species groups identified were found both along linear features and in the middle of agricultural fields. Of the five species groups analysed further, all had significantly more bat activity along linear features compared to the middle of fields, except for Nyctalus noctula . However, our results showed that 29% of calls from Rhinolophus ferrumequinum were recorded in the middle of agricultural fields, compared to only 10% for Pipistrellus pipistrellus . Bat activity was more likely to be associated with treelines compared to other linear feature types. 4. Our results highlight the importance of linear feature management to bat conservation, but also the need to consider field centres during survey design and Environmental Impact Assessments.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Domhnall Finch
Henry Schofield
Fiona Mathews
author_facet Domhnall Finch
Henry Schofield
Fiona Mathews
author_sort Domhnall Finch
title Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_short Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_full Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_fullStr Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_full_unstemmed Habitat Associations of Bats in an Agricultural Landscape: Linear Features Versus Open Habitats
title_sort habitat associations of bats in an agricultural landscape: linear features versus open habitats
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
https://doaj.org/article/1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e
genre Nyctalus noctula
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
genre_facet Nyctalus noctula
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
op_source Animals, Vol 10, Iss 1856, p 1856 (2020)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/10/1856
https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615
doi:10.3390/ani10101856
2076-2615
https://doaj.org/article/1f289576683e42b4aa9c288ed4c59d0e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101856
container_title Animals
container_volume 10
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1856
_version_ 1766154758335234048