Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California

Large terrestrial wildlife negatively impacts agricultural livelihoods on all continents except Antarctica. There is growing recognition of the need to reconcile these impacts to achieve socially and ecologically sustainable wildlife conservation agendas. Elk populations in northern California are e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Society
Main Authors: Adam R. Hanbury-Brown, Jeffery W. Stackhouse, Luke T. Macaulay
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12283-260123
https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622 2023-05-15T13:45:46+02:00 Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California Adam R. Hanbury-Brown Jeffery W. Stackhouse Luke T. Macaulay 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12283-260123 https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622 EN eng Resilience Alliance https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss1/art23/ https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087 1708-3087 doi:10.5751/ES-12283-260123 https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622 Ecology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 1, p 23 (2021) elk conflict hunting northern california pasture depredation private land rangeland wildlife conflict wildlife management Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12283-260123 2022-12-31T08:07:28Z Large terrestrial wildlife negatively impacts agricultural livelihoods on all continents except Antarctica. There is growing recognition of the need to reconcile these impacts to achieve socially and ecologically sustainable wildlife conservation agendas. Elk populations in northern California are estimated to have doubled in the past 35 years, marking a conservation success, but also increasing forage loss and damage to infrastructure on private land. Wildlife managers are pursuing the goal of increasing elk numbers on public lands, but elk are preferentially utilizing private pasture and rangeland, driving conflict with beef and dairy producers. We conducted 17 semistructured interviews with private landowners, primarily beef and dairy producers, in northern California to understand their experiences and reactions to elk conflict and state wildlife management. Landowners report that elk density on private rangeland has steadily increased in recent years and poses a threat to their businesses due to loss of forage, damage to fences, and the corresponding liability risk posed by breached fences and errant cattle. The absence of crop and forage loss compensation, difficulty obtaining depredation permits, and low harvest quotas for recreational hunting limit landowner mitigation options and foster resentment toward the state wildlife agency. Most landowners believe that current elk management policies, including restricted hunting opportunities, do not adequately address elk conflict, creating novel challenges for wildlife officials tasked with reconciling elk restoration goals with a variety of stakeholders experiencing economic losses and threats to rural livelihoods. We discuss these issues in the context of common wildlife management challenges, such as building social capital, defining tolerable impacts, and building institutional capacity for alternative solutions within rigid regulatory frameworks. We draw upon environmental economics and common-pool resource theory to suggest that a rethinking of elk ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Ecology and Society 26 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic elk conflict
hunting
northern california
pasture depredation
private land
rangeland
wildlife conflict
wildlife management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle elk conflict
hunting
northern california
pasture depredation
private land
rangeland
wildlife conflict
wildlife management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
Jeffery W. Stackhouse
Luke T. Macaulay
Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
topic_facet elk conflict
hunting
northern california
pasture depredation
private land
rangeland
wildlife conflict
wildlife management
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description Large terrestrial wildlife negatively impacts agricultural livelihoods on all continents except Antarctica. There is growing recognition of the need to reconcile these impacts to achieve socially and ecologically sustainable wildlife conservation agendas. Elk populations in northern California are estimated to have doubled in the past 35 years, marking a conservation success, but also increasing forage loss and damage to infrastructure on private land. Wildlife managers are pursuing the goal of increasing elk numbers on public lands, but elk are preferentially utilizing private pasture and rangeland, driving conflict with beef and dairy producers. We conducted 17 semistructured interviews with private landowners, primarily beef and dairy producers, in northern California to understand their experiences and reactions to elk conflict and state wildlife management. Landowners report that elk density on private rangeland has steadily increased in recent years and poses a threat to their businesses due to loss of forage, damage to fences, and the corresponding liability risk posed by breached fences and errant cattle. The absence of crop and forage loss compensation, difficulty obtaining depredation permits, and low harvest quotas for recreational hunting limit landowner mitigation options and foster resentment toward the state wildlife agency. Most landowners believe that current elk management policies, including restricted hunting opportunities, do not adequately address elk conflict, creating novel challenges for wildlife officials tasked with reconciling elk restoration goals with a variety of stakeholders experiencing economic losses and threats to rural livelihoods. We discuss these issues in the context of common wildlife management challenges, such as building social capital, defining tolerable impacts, and building institutional capacity for alternative solutions within rigid regulatory frameworks. We draw upon environmental economics and common-pool resource theory to suggest that a rethinking of elk ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
Jeffery W. Stackhouse
Luke T. Macaulay
author_facet Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
Jeffery W. Stackhouse
Luke T. Macaulay
author_sort Adam R. Hanbury-Brown
title Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_short Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_full Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_fullStr Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_full_unstemmed Elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern California
title_sort elk conflict with beef and dairy producers poses wildlife management challenges in northern california
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12283-260123
https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Ecology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 1, p 23 (2021)
op_relation https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss1/art23/
https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087
1708-3087
doi:10.5751/ES-12283-260123
https://doaj.org/article/1ef852862b1e48b3831b7caaef1e9622
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12283-260123
container_title Ecology and Society
container_volume 26
container_issue 1
_version_ 1766230672507142144