A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework

In 2007, the Ontario Ministry of Education released the Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework. The policy set forth a vision to significantly improve the levels of achievement for Indigenous students attending Ontario’s public schools, and to increase awareness and knowle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie Currie-Patterson, Kaitlyn Watson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
French
Published: Canadian Society for Studies in Education 2017
Subjects:
L
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb 2023-05-15T16:54:47+02:00 A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework Natalie Currie-Patterson Kaitlyn Watson 2017-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb EN FR eng fre Canadian Society for Studies in Education https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/30797 https://doaj.org/toc/1916-9221 1916-9221 https://doaj.org/article/1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, Vol 8, Iss 1 (2017) decolonizing education Indigenous education First Nation Métis and Inuit education Ontario education Education L article 2017 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-30T22:47:22Z In 2007, the Ontario Ministry of Education released the Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework. The policy set forth a vision to significantly improve the levels of achievement for Indigenous students attending Ontario’s public schools, and to increase awareness and knowledge of Indigenous cultures and perspectives for all students by the year 2016. Drawing upon critical pedagogy, theories of decolonizing education, and policy enactment, we engaged with the Framework and a set of related documents to a critical discourse analysis. Four discourses were revealed: achievement; increasing capacities; incorporating “cultures, histories, and perspectives”; and absence. In tracing the presence of these discourses across the documents we found that, while well-intentioned, the policy has yielded problematic outcomes. In turn, this undermines the ability of Ontario’s education system to not only reach the aforementioned goals but also to take an active role in reconciliation and efforts towards the decolonization of education. Article in Journal/Newspaper inuit Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
French
topic decolonizing education
Indigenous education
First Nation
Métis
and Inuit education
Ontario education
Education
L
spellingShingle decolonizing education
Indigenous education
First Nation
Métis
and Inuit education
Ontario education
Education
L
Natalie Currie-Patterson
Kaitlyn Watson
A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework
topic_facet decolonizing education
Indigenous education
First Nation
Métis
and Inuit education
Ontario education
Education
L
description In 2007, the Ontario Ministry of Education released the Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework. The policy set forth a vision to significantly improve the levels of achievement for Indigenous students attending Ontario’s public schools, and to increase awareness and knowledge of Indigenous cultures and perspectives for all students by the year 2016. Drawing upon critical pedagogy, theories of decolonizing education, and policy enactment, we engaged with the Framework and a set of related documents to a critical discourse analysis. Four discourses were revealed: achievement; increasing capacities; incorporating “cultures, histories, and perspectives”; and absence. In tracing the presence of these discourses across the documents we found that, while well-intentioned, the policy has yielded problematic outcomes. In turn, this undermines the ability of Ontario’s education system to not only reach the aforementioned goals but also to take an active role in reconciliation and efforts towards the decolonization of education.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Natalie Currie-Patterson
Kaitlyn Watson
author_facet Natalie Currie-Patterson
Kaitlyn Watson
author_sort Natalie Currie-Patterson
title A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework
title_short A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework
title_full A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework
title_fullStr A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework
title_full_unstemmed A policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: The Ontario First Nation, Métis, and Inuit Education Policy Framework
title_sort policy, a ‘priority’, an unfinished project: the ontario first nation, métis, and inuit education policy framework
publisher Canadian Society for Studies in Education
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb
genre inuit
genre_facet inuit
op_source Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, Vol 8, Iss 1 (2017)
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/30797
https://doaj.org/toc/1916-9221
1916-9221
https://doaj.org/article/1ece97b876154564a12fc81b0b0064bb
_version_ 1766045566974820352