Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies

This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Philip L. Munday
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022
Subjects:
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ocean acidification
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1 2023-05-15T17:50:08+02:00 Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies Philip L. Munday 2022-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/?tool=EBI https://doaj.org/toc/1544-9173 https://doaj.org/toc/1545-7885 1544-9173 1545-7885 https://doaj.org/article/1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1 PLoS Biology, Vol 20, Iss 11 (2022) Biology (General) QH301-705.5 article 2022 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-30T22:51:09Z This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Philip L. Munday
Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
topic_facet Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
description This Formal Comment uses re-analysis after appropriate corrections to claim that the extreme decline effect reported by Clements et al. is a statistical artefact caused by the way they corrected for zeros in percentage data, exacerbated by errors in data compilation, selective data inclusions and missing studies with strong effects.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Philip L. Munday
author_facet Philip L. Munday
author_sort Philip L. Munday
title Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_short Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_full Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_fullStr Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_full_unstemmed Reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
title_sort reanalysis shows there is not an extreme decline effect in fish ocean acidification studies
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source PLoS Biology, Vol 20, Iss 11 (2022)
op_relation https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9681065/?tool=EBI
https://doaj.org/toc/1544-9173
https://doaj.org/toc/1545-7885
1544-9173
1545-7885
https://doaj.org/article/1bdbbc37378d4acdafd94e1f6f8eaad1
_version_ 1766156741396922368

Similar Items