La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?

This study traces the evolution of the CCJA case law on the principle of exemption from enforcement for public companies. It aims in particular to highlight the direction in which this case law is moving. It appears that the CCJA has so far not succeeded in elaborating its own definition of the conc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Recht in Afrika
Main Author: Jules Masuku Ayikaba
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:German
English
French
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223
https://doaj.org/article/1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6 2023-05-15T13:54:11+02:00 La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis? Jules Masuku Ayikaba 2023-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223 https://doaj.org/article/1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6 DE EN FR ger eng fre Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223 https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270 2363-6270 doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223 https://doaj.org/article/1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6 Recht in Afrika, Vol 25, Iss 2, Pp 223-244 (2023) Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223 2023-03-19T01:29:27Z This study traces the evolution of the CCJA case law on the principle of exemption from enforcement for public companies. It aims in particular to highlight the direction in which this case law is moving. It appears that the CCJA has so far not succeeded in elaborating its own definition of the concept of “public companies”; yet it is there that, in our view, the mystery of the immunity from execution that it has long recognized to these companies hides; even when they were incorporated in the form of a corporation. However, over time, the Court has rightly reversed its previous decisions by moving from an extensive to a restrictive interpretation of exemption from enforcement. In any case, the involvement of the lawmaker is more than welcome in order to put an end to the situation of inequality, which has existed for a long time in terms of enforcement under OHADA law, between corporations having the State or its branches (public companies) as shareholders and those whose shareholders have no State participation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Pacific Recht in Afrika 25 2 223 244
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language German
English
French
topic Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
spellingShingle Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
Jules Masuku Ayikaba
La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?
topic_facet Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
description This study traces the evolution of the CCJA case law on the principle of exemption from enforcement for public companies. It aims in particular to highlight the direction in which this case law is moving. It appears that the CCJA has so far not succeeded in elaborating its own definition of the concept of “public companies”; yet it is there that, in our view, the mystery of the immunity from execution that it has long recognized to these companies hides; even when they were incorporated in the form of a corporation. However, over time, the Court has rightly reversed its previous decisions by moving from an extensive to a restrictive interpretation of exemption from enforcement. In any case, the involvement of the lawmaker is more than welcome in order to put an end to the situation of inequality, which has existed for a long time in terms of enforcement under OHADA law, between corporations having the State or its branches (public companies) as shareholders and those whose shareholders have no State participation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jules Masuku Ayikaba
author_facet Jules Masuku Ayikaba
author_sort Jules Masuku Ayikaba
title La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?
title_short La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?
title_full La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?
title_fullStr La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?
title_full_unstemmed La jurisprudence de la Cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (CCJA) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – Quo vadis?
title_sort la jurisprudence de la cour commune de justice et d’arbitrage (ccja) sur l’immunité d’exécution au profit des entreprises publiques – quo vadis?
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223
https://doaj.org/article/1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Recht in Afrika, Vol 25, Iss 2, Pp 223-244 (2023)
op_relation https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223
https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270
2363-6270
doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223
https://doaj.org/article/1a181633c5684778ae7f7cbbc51df7f6
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-223
container_title Recht in Afrika
container_volume 25
container_issue 2
container_start_page 223
op_container_end_page 244
_version_ 1766259875506028544