The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis

This article argues that land dispossession of the indigenous people (the Khoikhoi and the San) and the black communities in South Africa started long before 1913. The first process of land dispossession commenced when the first Dutch settlers arrived at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. Thereafter, co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Recht in Afrika
Main Author: Samuel Freddy Khunou
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:German
English
French
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153
https://doaj.org/article/198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d 2023-05-15T13:35:37+02:00 The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis Samuel Freddy Khunou 2016-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153 https://doaj.org/article/198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d DE EN FR ger eng fre Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153 https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270 2363-6270 doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153 https://doaj.org/article/198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d Recht in Afrika, Vol 18, Iss 2, Pp 153-180 (2016) Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica KL-KWX article 2016 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153 2022-12-31T04:02:29Z This article argues that land dispossession of the indigenous people (the Khoikhoi and the San) and the black communities in South Africa started long before 1913. The first process of land dispossession commenced when the first Dutch settlers arrived at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. Thereafter, conquest and colonial settlement of the Dutch and later the British became the standard methods of land dispossession before the promulgation of the Natives’ Land Act 27 of 1913. In actual fact, this Act among others, legitimised, entrenched and legalised the pre-1913 land dispossession. In addition, this obnoxious piece of legislation engendered another form of aggressive land dispossession coupled with brutal forced removals. It is against this backdrop that this article contends that section 25 (7) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 restricts the right to restitution to the 19 June 1913 contrary to the principles of equality and justice. As a result, it excludes the descendants of the communities and persons dispossessed before 1913 from the entire constitutional scheme of restitution. Furthermore, section 25 (7) fails to take into account all-inclusive history of land dispossession in South Africa. In doing so, it perpetuates the injustices of the past. Therefore, this article submits that given South Africa’s sad history of land dispossession, section 25 (7) should be amended to allow (the descendants of the co Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Pacific Recht in Afrika 18 2 153 180
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language German
English
French
topic Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
spellingShingle Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
Samuel Freddy Khunou
The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis
topic_facet Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
KL-KWX
description This article argues that land dispossession of the indigenous people (the Khoikhoi and the San) and the black communities in South Africa started long before 1913. The first process of land dispossession commenced when the first Dutch settlers arrived at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. Thereafter, conquest and colonial settlement of the Dutch and later the British became the standard methods of land dispossession before the promulgation of the Natives’ Land Act 27 of 1913. In actual fact, this Act among others, legitimised, entrenched and legalised the pre-1913 land dispossession. In addition, this obnoxious piece of legislation engendered another form of aggressive land dispossession coupled with brutal forced removals. It is against this backdrop that this article contends that section 25 (7) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 restricts the right to restitution to the 19 June 1913 contrary to the principles of equality and justice. As a result, it excludes the descendants of the communities and persons dispossessed before 1913 from the entire constitutional scheme of restitution. Furthermore, section 25 (7) fails to take into account all-inclusive history of land dispossession in South Africa. In doing so, it perpetuates the injustices of the past. Therefore, this article submits that given South Africa’s sad history of land dispossession, section 25 (7) should be amended to allow (the descendants of the co
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Samuel Freddy Khunou
author_facet Samuel Freddy Khunou
author_sort Samuel Freddy Khunou
title The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis
title_short The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis
title_full The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis
title_fullStr The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Legal Crisis of Land Restitution in South Africa: A Critical Analysis
title_sort legal crisis of land restitution in south africa: a critical analysis
publisher Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153
https://doaj.org/article/198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Recht in Afrika, Vol 18, Iss 2, Pp 153-180 (2016)
op_relation https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153
https://doaj.org/toc/2363-6270
2363-6270
doi:10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153
https://doaj.org/article/198452df41f5479babc90d6b359afc6d
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2015-2-153
container_title Recht in Afrika
container_volume 18
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
op_container_end_page 180
_version_ 1766068090026590208