European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities

Over the past two years, the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and the UK have increased climate ambition and aggressively pushed forward an agenda to pursue climate neutrality or net-zero emissions by mid-century. This increased ambition, partly the result of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Climate
Main Authors: Eve Tamme, Larissa Lee Beck
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Subjects:
CDR
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882
https://doaj.org/article/18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2 2023-05-15T16:51:12+02:00 European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities Eve Tamme Larissa Lee Beck 2021-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882 https://doaj.org/article/18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2 EN eng Frontiers Media S.A. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882/full https://doaj.org/toc/2624-9553 2624-9553 doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.682882 https://doaj.org/article/18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2 Frontiers in Climate, Vol 3 (2021) European Union carbon dioxide removal policy negative emissions climate change CDR Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882 2022-12-31T07:42:10Z Over the past two years, the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and the UK have increased climate ambition and aggressively pushed forward an agenda to pursue climate neutrality or net-zero emissions by mid-century. This increased ambition, partly the result of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's landmark findings on limiting global warming to 1.5°C, has also led to a renewed approach to and revitalized debate about the role of carbon capture and storage and carbon dioxide removal. With increasing climate ambition, including a mid-century climate neutrality goal for the whole European Union, the potential role of technological carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is emerging as one of the critical points of debate among NGOs, policymakers, and the private sector. Policymakers are starting to discuss how to incentivize a CDR scale-up. What encompasses the current debate, and how does it relate to CDR technologies' expected role in reaching climate neutrality? This perspective will highlight that policy must fill two gaps: the accounting and the commercialization gap for the near-term development of a comprehensive CDR policy framework. It will shine a light on the current status of negative emission technologies and the role of carbon capture and storage in delivering negative emissions in Europe's decarbonized future. It will also analyze the role of carbon markets, including voluntary markets, as potential incentives while exploring policy pathways for a near-term scale-up. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Frontiers in Climate 3
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic European Union
carbon dioxide removal
policy
negative emissions
climate change
CDR
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle European Union
carbon dioxide removal
policy
negative emissions
climate change
CDR
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Eve Tamme
Larissa Lee Beck
European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities
topic_facet European Union
carbon dioxide removal
policy
negative emissions
climate change
CDR
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description Over the past two years, the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and the UK have increased climate ambition and aggressively pushed forward an agenda to pursue climate neutrality or net-zero emissions by mid-century. This increased ambition, partly the result of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's landmark findings on limiting global warming to 1.5°C, has also led to a renewed approach to and revitalized debate about the role of carbon capture and storage and carbon dioxide removal. With increasing climate ambition, including a mid-century climate neutrality goal for the whole European Union, the potential role of technological carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is emerging as one of the critical points of debate among NGOs, policymakers, and the private sector. Policymakers are starting to discuss how to incentivize a CDR scale-up. What encompasses the current debate, and how does it relate to CDR technologies' expected role in reaching climate neutrality? This perspective will highlight that policy must fill two gaps: the accounting and the commercialization gap for the near-term development of a comprehensive CDR policy framework. It will shine a light on the current status of negative emission technologies and the role of carbon capture and storage in delivering negative emissions in Europe's decarbonized future. It will also analyze the role of carbon markets, including voluntary markets, as potential incentives while exploring policy pathways for a near-term scale-up.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Eve Tamme
Larissa Lee Beck
author_facet Eve Tamme
Larissa Lee Beck
author_sort Eve Tamme
title European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities
title_short European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities
title_full European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities
title_fullStr European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities
title_full_unstemmed European Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy: Current Status and Future Opportunities
title_sort european carbon dioxide removal policy: current status and future opportunities
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882
https://doaj.org/article/18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Frontiers in Climate, Vol 3 (2021)
op_relation https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882/full
https://doaj.org/toc/2624-9553
2624-9553
doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.682882
https://doaj.org/article/18ed832df6ea426d8fa3205a6d2a46f2
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.682882
container_title Frontiers in Climate
container_volume 3
_version_ 1766041305972998144