Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program

The federal Fiscal Stabilization Program is meant to provide financial support for provinces that suffer extraordinary declines in revenues. However, the program only provided $248 million payment to Alberta in 2015-16 in the face of a $8.8 billion decline in revenues, and no support for Saskatchewa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bev Dahlby
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825 2023-06-11T04:14:11+02:00 Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program Bev Dahlby 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825 EN eng University of Calgary https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/68076 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320 2560-8312 2560-8320 https://doaj.org/article/18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825 The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 12 (2019) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 article 2019 ftdoajarticles 2023-04-23T00:33:07Z The federal Fiscal Stabilization Program is meant to provide financial support for provinces that suffer extraordinary declines in revenues. However, the program only provided $248 million payment to Alberta in 2015-16 in the face of a $8.8 billion decline in revenues, and no support for Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador that have also suffered significant revenue reductions in recent years. We discuss the rationale for a Fiscal Stabilization Program, and three principles that should be adopted in re-designing it: · Payments should be based on declines in a province’s own-source revenues from an average of its past years’ own-source revenues · The program should preserve incentives for provinces to maintain prudent fiscal policies by only covering losses that exceed some percentage of “normal” own-source revenues (a deductible) and then only covering a fraction of eligible losses (co-insurance). · Formulas determining payments should be simple and transparent with no adjustment for changes in provincial tax policies that may affect own-source revenues. We propose some alternative formulas, consistent with these principles, for calculating the fiscal insurance payments and show the support levels that they would have provided to the provinces since the mid-1980s. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Newfoundland
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
spellingShingle Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Bev Dahlby
Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program
topic_facet Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
description The federal Fiscal Stabilization Program is meant to provide financial support for provinces that suffer extraordinary declines in revenues. However, the program only provided $248 million payment to Alberta in 2015-16 in the face of a $8.8 billion decline in revenues, and no support for Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador that have also suffered significant revenue reductions in recent years. We discuss the rationale for a Fiscal Stabilization Program, and three principles that should be adopted in re-designing it: · Payments should be based on declines in a province’s own-source revenues from an average of its past years’ own-source revenues · The program should preserve incentives for provinces to maintain prudent fiscal policies by only covering losses that exceed some percentage of “normal” own-source revenues (a deductible) and then only covering a fraction of eligible losses (co-insurance). · Formulas determining payments should be simple and transparent with no adjustment for changes in provincial tax policies that may affect own-source revenues. We propose some alternative formulas, consistent with these principles, for calculating the fiscal insurance payments and show the support levels that they would have provided to the provinces since the mid-1980s.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bev Dahlby
author_facet Bev Dahlby
author_sort Bev Dahlby
title Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program
title_short Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program
title_full Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program
title_fullStr Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program
title_full_unstemmed Reforming the Federal Fiscal Stabilization Program
title_sort reforming the federal fiscal stabilization program
publisher University of Calgary
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825
geographic Newfoundland
geographic_facet Newfoundland
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 12 (2019)
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/68076
https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312
https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320
2560-8312
2560-8320
https://doaj.org/article/18b1656656004d7f9001b79878226825
_version_ 1768392008457519104