Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program

Mining jurisdictions around the world are grappling with the significant environmental harms and costs associated with orphaned mines, i.e., mines whose owners are financially unable or otherwise unwilling to remediate and reclaim their mine sites. Numerous Canadian examples, including the notorious...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The School of Public Policy Publications
Main Authors: Martin Olszynski, Andrew Leach, Drew Yewchuk
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856
https://doaj.org/article/183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257 2024-01-21T10:09:06+01:00 Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program Martin Olszynski Andrew Leach Drew Yewchuk 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856 https://doaj.org/article/183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257 EN eng University of Calgary https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/77856 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312 https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320 doi:10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856 2560-8312 2560-8320 https://doaj.org/article/183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257 The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 16, Iss 1 (2023) Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856 2023-12-24T01:41:38Z Mining jurisdictions around the world are grappling with the significant environmental harms and costs associated with orphaned mines, i.e., mines whose owners are financially unable or otherwise unwilling to remediate and reclaim their mine sites. Numerous Canadian examples, including the notorious Giant Mine in the Northwest Territories, have significantly harmed water, soil, air, and wildlife, as well as human health, safety, and well-being. Such impacts can be particularly devastating for Indigenous peoples, who continue to rely on their traditional territories for cultural and other purposes. Canadian governments have gradually developed remediation and reclamation liability regimes to ensure that mine operators remediate and reclaim in a timely manner, or to at least ensure that governments have access to sufficient funds to carry out this closure work themselves. While they differ in various ways, the basic logic of such regimes is the same: by requiring mine owners to set aside some funds (e.g., in the form of cash or a letter of credit), they act as a kind of insurance that the public will not bear the costs of remediation and reclamation. Unfortunately, Alberta has refused to develop an effective regime to protect Albertans from bearing the costs of oil sands mine remediation and reclamation. The regime in place today will not ensure that there are sufficient funds set aside to complete this closure work in the event that operators fail to do so. In some respects, this is not news. It has been over two decades since Alberta’s Auditor General first identified serious deficiencies in Alberta’s regime. Continued mismanagement has left Albertans with a significant risk that they will be responsible for cleaning up oil sands mines that threaten potentially irreversible environmental harm, including a growing inventory of nearly 1.6 trillion litres of toxic tailings. Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program (MFSP), which applies to both coal and oil sands mines, is a misnomer. While it allows mine owners to ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Northwest Territories Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Northwest Territories The School of Public Policy Publications 16 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
spellingShingle Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
Martin Olszynski
Andrew Leach
Drew Yewchuk
Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program
topic_facet Political institutions and public administration (General)
JF20-2112
description Mining jurisdictions around the world are grappling with the significant environmental harms and costs associated with orphaned mines, i.e., mines whose owners are financially unable or otherwise unwilling to remediate and reclaim their mine sites. Numerous Canadian examples, including the notorious Giant Mine in the Northwest Territories, have significantly harmed water, soil, air, and wildlife, as well as human health, safety, and well-being. Such impacts can be particularly devastating for Indigenous peoples, who continue to rely on their traditional territories for cultural and other purposes. Canadian governments have gradually developed remediation and reclamation liability regimes to ensure that mine operators remediate and reclaim in a timely manner, or to at least ensure that governments have access to sufficient funds to carry out this closure work themselves. While they differ in various ways, the basic logic of such regimes is the same: by requiring mine owners to set aside some funds (e.g., in the form of cash or a letter of credit), they act as a kind of insurance that the public will not bear the costs of remediation and reclamation. Unfortunately, Alberta has refused to develop an effective regime to protect Albertans from bearing the costs of oil sands mine remediation and reclamation. The regime in place today will not ensure that there are sufficient funds set aside to complete this closure work in the event that operators fail to do so. In some respects, this is not news. It has been over two decades since Alberta’s Auditor General first identified serious deficiencies in Alberta’s regime. Continued mismanagement has left Albertans with a significant risk that they will be responsible for cleaning up oil sands mines that threaten potentially irreversible environmental harm, including a growing inventory of nearly 1.6 trillion litres of toxic tailings. Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program (MFSP), which applies to both coal and oil sands mines, is a misnomer. While it allows mine owners to ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Martin Olszynski
Andrew Leach
Drew Yewchuk
author_facet Martin Olszynski
Andrew Leach
Drew Yewchuk
author_sort Martin Olszynski
title Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program
title_short Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program
title_full Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program
title_fullStr Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program
title_full_unstemmed Not Fit for Purpose: Oil Sands Mines and Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program
title_sort not fit for purpose: oil sands mines and alberta’s mine financial security program
publisher University of Calgary
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856
https://doaj.org/article/183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257
geographic Northwest Territories
geographic_facet Northwest Territories
genre Northwest Territories
genre_facet Northwest Territories
op_source The School of Public Policy Publications, Vol 16, Iss 1 (2023)
op_relation https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/sppp/article/view/77856
https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8312
https://doaj.org/toc/2560-8320
doi:10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856
2560-8312
2560-8320
https://doaj.org/article/183b596dd18149f3bc8c7af37920c257
op_doi https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/sppp.v16i1.77856
container_title The School of Public Policy Publications
container_volume 16
container_issue 1
_version_ 1788700021175091200