Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study

While carbon dioxide is the main cause for global warming, modeling short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) such as methane, ozone, and particles in the Arctic allows us to simulate near-term climate and health impacts for a sensitive, pristine region that is warming at 3 times the global rate. Atmosphe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: C. H. Whaley, R. Mahmood, K. von Salzen, B. Winter, S. Eckhardt, S. Arnold, S. Beagley, S. Becagli, R.-Y. Chien, J. Christensen, S. M. Damani, X. Dong, K. Eleftheriadis, N. Evangeliou, G. Faluvegi, M. Flanner, J. S. Fu, M. Gauss, F. Giardi, W. Gong, J. L. Hjorth, L. Huang, U. Im, Y. Kanaya, S. Krishnan, Z. Klimont, T. Kühn, J. Langner, K. S. Law, L. Marelle, A. Massling, D. Olivié, T. Onishi, N. Oshima, Y. Peng, D. A. Plummer, O. Popovicheva, L. Pozzoli, J.-C. Raut, M. Sand, L. N. Saunders, J. Schmale, S. Sharma, R. B. Skeie, H. Skov, F. Taketani, M. A. Thomas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022
https://doaj.org/article/1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e 2023-05-15T13:21:35+02:00 Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study C. H. Whaley R. Mahmood K. von Salzen B. Winter S. Eckhardt S. Arnold S. Beagley S. Becagli R.-Y. Chien J. Christensen S. M. Damani X. Dong K. Eleftheriadis N. Evangeliou G. Faluvegi M. Flanner J. S. Fu M. Gauss F. Giardi W. Gong J. L. Hjorth L. Huang U. Im Y. Kanaya S. Krishnan Z. Klimont T. Kühn J. Langner K. S. Law L. Marelle A. Massling D. Olivié T. Onishi N. Oshima Y. Peng D. A. Plummer O. Popovicheva L. Pozzoli J.-C. Raut M. Sand L. N. Saunders J. Schmale S. Sharma R. B. Skeie H. Skov F. Taketani M. A. Thomas 2022-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022 https://doaj.org/article/1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e EN eng Copernicus Publications https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5775/2022/acp-22-5775-2022.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316 https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324 doi:10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022 1680-7316 1680-7324 https://doaj.org/article/1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 22, Pp 5775-5828 (2022) Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022 2022-12-30T21:25:46Z While carbon dioxide is the main cause for global warming, modeling short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) such as methane, ozone, and particles in the Arctic allows us to simulate near-term climate and health impacts for a sensitive, pristine region that is warming at 3 times the global rate. Atmospheric modeling is critical for understanding the long-range transport of pollutants to the Arctic, as well as the abundance and distribution of SLCFs throughout the Arctic atmosphere. Modeling is also used as a tool to determine SLCF impacts on climate and health in the present and in future emissions scenarios. In this study, we evaluate 18 state-of-the-art atmospheric and Earth system models by assessing their representation of Arctic and Northern Hemisphere atmospheric SLCF distributions, considering a wide range of different chemical species (methane, tropospheric ozone and its precursors, black carbon, sulfate, organic aerosol, and particulate matter) and multiple observational datasets. Model simulations over 4 years (2008–2009 and 2014–2015) conducted for the 2022 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) SLCF assessment report are thoroughly evaluated against satellite, ground, ship, and aircraft-based observations. The annual means, seasonal cycles, and 3-D distributions of SLCFs were evaluated using several metrics, such as absolute and percent model biases and correlation coefficients. The results show a large range in model performance, with no one particular model or model type performing well for all regions and all SLCF species. The multi-model mean (mmm) was able to represent the general features of SLCFs in the Arctic and had the best overall performance. For the SLCFs with the greatest radiative impact (CH 4 , O 3 , BC, and SO <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><msubsup><mi/><mn mathvariant="normal">4</mn><mrow><mn ... Article in Journal/Newspaper AMAP Arctic black carbon Global warming Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22 9 5775 5828
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
C. H. Whaley
R. Mahmood
K. von Salzen
B. Winter
S. Eckhardt
S. Arnold
S. Beagley
S. Becagli
R.-Y. Chien
J. Christensen
S. M. Damani
X. Dong
K. Eleftheriadis
N. Evangeliou
G. Faluvegi
M. Flanner
J. S. Fu
M. Gauss
F. Giardi
W. Gong
J. L. Hjorth
L. Huang
U. Im
Y. Kanaya
S. Krishnan
Z. Klimont
T. Kühn
J. Langner
K. S. Law
L. Marelle
A. Massling
D. Olivié
T. Onishi
N. Oshima
Y. Peng
D. A. Plummer
O. Popovicheva
L. Pozzoli
J.-C. Raut
M. Sand
L. N. Saunders
J. Schmale
S. Sharma
R. B. Skeie
H. Skov
F. Taketani
M. A. Thomas
Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
topic_facet Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
description While carbon dioxide is the main cause for global warming, modeling short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs) such as methane, ozone, and particles in the Arctic allows us to simulate near-term climate and health impacts for a sensitive, pristine region that is warming at 3 times the global rate. Atmospheric modeling is critical for understanding the long-range transport of pollutants to the Arctic, as well as the abundance and distribution of SLCFs throughout the Arctic atmosphere. Modeling is also used as a tool to determine SLCF impacts on climate and health in the present and in future emissions scenarios. In this study, we evaluate 18 state-of-the-art atmospheric and Earth system models by assessing their representation of Arctic and Northern Hemisphere atmospheric SLCF distributions, considering a wide range of different chemical species (methane, tropospheric ozone and its precursors, black carbon, sulfate, organic aerosol, and particulate matter) and multiple observational datasets. Model simulations over 4 years (2008–2009 and 2014–2015) conducted for the 2022 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) SLCF assessment report are thoroughly evaluated against satellite, ground, ship, and aircraft-based observations. The annual means, seasonal cycles, and 3-D distributions of SLCFs were evaluated using several metrics, such as absolute and percent model biases and correlation coefficients. The results show a large range in model performance, with no one particular model or model type performing well for all regions and all SLCF species. The multi-model mean (mmm) was able to represent the general features of SLCFs in the Arctic and had the best overall performance. For the SLCFs with the greatest radiative impact (CH 4 , O 3 , BC, and SO <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><msubsup><mi/><mn mathvariant="normal">4</mn><mrow><mn ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author C. H. Whaley
R. Mahmood
K. von Salzen
B. Winter
S. Eckhardt
S. Arnold
S. Beagley
S. Becagli
R.-Y. Chien
J. Christensen
S. M. Damani
X. Dong
K. Eleftheriadis
N. Evangeliou
G. Faluvegi
M. Flanner
J. S. Fu
M. Gauss
F. Giardi
W. Gong
J. L. Hjorth
L. Huang
U. Im
Y. Kanaya
S. Krishnan
Z. Klimont
T. Kühn
J. Langner
K. S. Law
L. Marelle
A. Massling
D. Olivié
T. Onishi
N. Oshima
Y. Peng
D. A. Plummer
O. Popovicheva
L. Pozzoli
J.-C. Raut
M. Sand
L. N. Saunders
J. Schmale
S. Sharma
R. B. Skeie
H. Skov
F. Taketani
M. A. Thomas
author_facet C. H. Whaley
R. Mahmood
K. von Salzen
B. Winter
S. Eckhardt
S. Arnold
S. Beagley
S. Becagli
R.-Y. Chien
J. Christensen
S. M. Damani
X. Dong
K. Eleftheriadis
N. Evangeliou
G. Faluvegi
M. Flanner
J. S. Fu
M. Gauss
F. Giardi
W. Gong
J. L. Hjorth
L. Huang
U. Im
Y. Kanaya
S. Krishnan
Z. Klimont
T. Kühn
J. Langner
K. S. Law
L. Marelle
A. Massling
D. Olivié
T. Onishi
N. Oshima
Y. Peng
D. A. Plummer
O. Popovicheva
L. Pozzoli
J.-C. Raut
M. Sand
L. N. Saunders
J. Schmale
S. Sharma
R. B. Skeie
H. Skov
F. Taketani
M. A. Thomas
author_sort C. H. Whaley
title Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
title_short Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
title_full Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
title_fullStr Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
title_full_unstemmed Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
title_sort model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the arctic monitoring and assessment programme: a multi-species, multi-model study
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022
https://doaj.org/article/1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre AMAP
Arctic
black carbon
Global warming
genre_facet AMAP
Arctic
black carbon
Global warming
op_source Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol 22, Pp 5775-5828 (2022)
op_relation https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5775/2022/acp-22-5775-2022.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7316
https://doaj.org/toc/1680-7324
doi:10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022
1680-7316
1680-7324
https://doaj.org/article/1808c4d43efe4e799ac4a0cc1eedbe9e
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 22
container_issue 9
container_start_page 5775
op_container_end_page 5828
_version_ 1766360408378048512