Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes

A study was conducted to assess efficacy of a new repellent brand TRIG (15% N-N Diethyl Benzamide) when compared to DEET (20% N-N Methyl Toluamide). The repellents were tested in laboratory and field. In the laboratory, the repellence was tested on human volunteers, by exposing their repellent-treat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Tropical Medicine
Main Authors: Shandala Msangi, Eliningaya Kweka, Aneth Mahande
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616
https://doaj.org/article/1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a 2023-05-15T15:07:48+02:00 Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes Shandala Msangi Eliningaya Kweka Aneth Mahande 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616 https://doaj.org/article/1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a EN eng Hindawi Limited http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616 https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9686 https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9694 1687-9686 1687-9694 doi:10.1155/2018/9037616 https://doaj.org/article/1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a Journal of Tropical Medicine, Vol 2018 (2018) Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine RC955-962 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616 2023-01-08T01:29:40Z A study was conducted to assess efficacy of a new repellent brand TRIG (15% N-N Diethyl Benzamide) when compared to DEET (20% N-N Methyl Toluamide). The repellents were tested in laboratory and field. In the laboratory, the repellence was tested on human volunteers, by exposing their repellent-treated arms on starved mosquitoes in cages for 3 minutes at hourly intervals, while counting the landing and probing attempts. Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were used. Field evaluation was conducted by Human Landing Catch technique. During the night, the repellents were applied on arms and legs and mosquitoes landing on these areas were collected. In laboratory tests, TRIG provided complete protection (100%) against Anopheles gambiae when applied at 1.25 g, while DEET provided this at 0.75 g. When tested on Aedes aegypti, TRIG provided complete protection when applied at 1 g, compared to 0.5 g for DEET. In the field, when applied at a recommended dose, both TRIG and DEET achieved above 90% protection against both An. arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus and a Complete Protection Time of about 6 hrs against both species of mosquitoes. The performances of the two products were found to be comparable and TRIG was recommended for use as repellent against mosquito bites. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic The Landing ENVELOPE(-45.689,-45.689,-60.733,-60.733) Journal of Tropical Medicine 2018 1 5
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
spellingShingle Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
Shandala Msangi
Eliningaya Kweka
Aneth Mahande
Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes
topic_facet Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine
RC955-962
description A study was conducted to assess efficacy of a new repellent brand TRIG (15% N-N Diethyl Benzamide) when compared to DEET (20% N-N Methyl Toluamide). The repellents were tested in laboratory and field. In the laboratory, the repellence was tested on human volunteers, by exposing their repellent-treated arms on starved mosquitoes in cages for 3 minutes at hourly intervals, while counting the landing and probing attempts. Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes were used. Field evaluation was conducted by Human Landing Catch technique. During the night, the repellents were applied on arms and legs and mosquitoes landing on these areas were collected. In laboratory tests, TRIG provided complete protection (100%) against Anopheles gambiae when applied at 1.25 g, while DEET provided this at 0.75 g. When tested on Aedes aegypti, TRIG provided complete protection when applied at 1 g, compared to 0.5 g for DEET. In the field, when applied at a recommended dose, both TRIG and DEET achieved above 90% protection against both An. arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus and a Complete Protection Time of about 6 hrs against both species of mosquitoes. The performances of the two products were found to be comparable and TRIG was recommended for use as repellent against mosquito bites.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shandala Msangi
Eliningaya Kweka
Aneth Mahande
author_facet Shandala Msangi
Eliningaya Kweka
Aneth Mahande
author_sort Shandala Msangi
title Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes
title_short Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes
title_full Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes
title_fullStr Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes
title_full_unstemmed Repellent Activity of TRIG (N-N Diethyl Benzamide) against Man-Biting Mosquitoes
title_sort repellent activity of trig (n-n diethyl benzamide) against man-biting mosquitoes
publisher Hindawi Limited
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616
https://doaj.org/article/1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a
long_lat ENVELOPE(-45.689,-45.689,-60.733,-60.733)
geographic Arctic
The Landing
geographic_facet Arctic
The Landing
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Journal of Tropical Medicine, Vol 2018 (2018)
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616
https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9686
https://doaj.org/toc/1687-9694
1687-9686
1687-9694
doi:10.1155/2018/9037616
https://doaj.org/article/1747287d541a4b1497353b4a2b7e5d7a
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037616
container_title Journal of Tropical Medicine
container_volume 2018
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 5
_version_ 1766339220091174912