Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.

Killer whale (Orcinus orca) depredation (whales stealing or damaging fish caught on fishing gear) adversely impacts demersal longline fisheries for sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and Greenland turbot (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) in the Bering Sea, Aleutia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: Megan J Peterson, Franz Mueter, Keith Criddle, Alan C Haynie
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088906
https://doaj.org/article/15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60
_version_ 1821871528262762496
author Megan J Peterson
Franz Mueter
Keith Criddle
Alan C Haynie
author_facet Megan J Peterson
Franz Mueter
Keith Criddle
Alan C Haynie
author_sort Megan J Peterson
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
container_issue 2
container_start_page e88906
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 9
description Killer whale (Orcinus orca) depredation (whales stealing or damaging fish caught on fishing gear) adversely impacts demersal longline fisheries for sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and Greenland turbot (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands and Western Gulf of Alaska. These interactions increase direct costs and opportunity costs associated with catching fish and reduce the profitability of longline fishing in western Alaska. This study synthesizes National Marine Fisheries Service observer data, National Marine Fisheries Service sablefish longline survey and fishermen-collected depredation data to: 1) estimate the frequency of killer whale depredation on longline fisheries in Alaska; 2) estimate depredation-related catch per unit effort reductions; and 3) assess direct costs and opportunity costs incurred by longliners in western Alaska as a result of killer whale interactions. The percentage of commercial fishery sets affected by killer whales was highest in the Bering Sea fisheries for: sablefish (21.4%), Greenland turbot (9.9%), and Pacific halibut (6.9%). Average catch per unit effort reductions on depredated sets ranged from 35.1-69.3% for the observed longline fleet in all three management areas from 1998-2012 (p<0.001). To compensate for depredation, fishermen set additional gear to catch the same amount of fish, and this increased fuel costs by an additional 82% per depredated set (average $433 additional fuel per depredated set). In a separate analysis with six longline vessels in 2011 and 2012, killer whale depredation avoidance measures resulted in an average additional cost of $494 per depredated vessel-day for fuel and crew food. Opportunity costs of time lost by fishermen averaged $522 per additional vessel-day on the grounds. This assessment of killer whale depredation costs represents the most extensive economic evaluation of this issue in Alaska to date and will help longline fishermen and managers consider the costs and ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Bering Sea
Greenland
Killer Whale
Orca
Orcinus orca
Turbot
Alaska
Aleutian Islands
Killer whale
genre_facet Bering Sea
Greenland
Killer Whale
Orca
Orcinus orca
Turbot
Alaska
Aleutian Islands
Killer whale
geographic Bering Sea
Greenland
Gulf of Alaska
Pacific
geographic_facet Bering Sea
Greenland
Gulf of Alaska
Pacific
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088906
op_relation http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3928335?pdf=render
https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203
1932-6203
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088906
https://doaj.org/article/15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60
op_source PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e88906 (2014)
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60 2025-01-16T21:17:39+00:00 Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners. Megan J Peterson Franz Mueter Keith Criddle Alan C Haynie 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088906 https://doaj.org/article/15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3928335?pdf=render https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203 1932-6203 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088906 https://doaj.org/article/15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60 PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 2, p e88906 (2014) Medicine R Science Q article 2014 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088906 2022-12-31T03:55:46Z Killer whale (Orcinus orca) depredation (whales stealing or damaging fish caught on fishing gear) adversely impacts demersal longline fisheries for sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria), Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) and Greenland turbot (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) in the Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands and Western Gulf of Alaska. These interactions increase direct costs and opportunity costs associated with catching fish and reduce the profitability of longline fishing in western Alaska. This study synthesizes National Marine Fisheries Service observer data, National Marine Fisheries Service sablefish longline survey and fishermen-collected depredation data to: 1) estimate the frequency of killer whale depredation on longline fisheries in Alaska; 2) estimate depredation-related catch per unit effort reductions; and 3) assess direct costs and opportunity costs incurred by longliners in western Alaska as a result of killer whale interactions. The percentage of commercial fishery sets affected by killer whales was highest in the Bering Sea fisheries for: sablefish (21.4%), Greenland turbot (9.9%), and Pacific halibut (6.9%). Average catch per unit effort reductions on depredated sets ranged from 35.1-69.3% for the observed longline fleet in all three management areas from 1998-2012 (p<0.001). To compensate for depredation, fishermen set additional gear to catch the same amount of fish, and this increased fuel costs by an additional 82% per depredated set (average $433 additional fuel per depredated set). In a separate analysis with six longline vessels in 2011 and 2012, killer whale depredation avoidance measures resulted in an average additional cost of $494 per depredated vessel-day for fuel and crew food. Opportunity costs of time lost by fishermen averaged $522 per additional vessel-day on the grounds. This assessment of killer whale depredation costs represents the most extensive economic evaluation of this issue in Alaska to date and will help longline fishermen and managers consider the costs and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Bering Sea Greenland Killer Whale Orca Orcinus orca Turbot Alaska Aleutian Islands Killer whale Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Bering Sea Greenland Gulf of Alaska Pacific PLoS ONE 9 2 e88906
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Megan J Peterson
Franz Mueter
Keith Criddle
Alan C Haynie
Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.
title Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.
title_full Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.
title_fullStr Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.
title_full_unstemmed Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.
title_short Killer whale depredation and associated costs to Alaskan sablefish, Pacific halibut and Greenland turbot longliners.
title_sort killer whale depredation and associated costs to alaskan sablefish, pacific halibut and greenland turbot longliners.
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
topic_facet Medicine
R
Science
Q
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088906
https://doaj.org/article/15fb9e4029964001bae44a3c049f0e60