Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism

While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. App...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water
Main Author: Deborah Curran
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
https://doaj.org/article/15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f 2023-05-15T16:16:00+02:00 Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism Deborah Curran 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 https://doaj.org/article/15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f EN eng MDPI AG http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/571 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4441 2073-4441 doi:10.3390/w11030571 https://doaj.org/article/15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f Water, Vol 11, Iss 3, p 571 (2019) water governance politics law decision-making processes governmentalities UNDRIP free prior and informed consent FPIC groundwater environmental flows environmental assessment Hydraulic engineering TC1-978 Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes TD201-500 article 2019 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571 2022-12-31T08:29:40Z While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. Applying a political ecology lens to the settler colonialism of water governance exposes the continued depoliticizing personality of natural resources decision-making and reveals water as an abstract, static resource in law and governance processes. Most plainly, these decision-making processes inadequately consider environmental flows or cumulative effects and are at odds with both Indigenous governance and social-ecological approaches to watershed management. Using the example of groundwater licensing in British Columbia, Canada as reinforcing colonialism in water governance, this article examines how First Nations are asserting Indigenous rights in response to natural resource decision-making. Both within and outside of colonial governance processes they are establishing administrative and governance structures that express their water laws and jurisdiction. These structures include the Syilx, Nadleh Wut’en and Stellat’en creating standards for water, the Tsleil-Waututh and Stk’emlúpsemc te Secwépemc community assessments of proposed pipeline and mining facilities, and the First Nations of the Nicola Valley planning process based on their own legal traditions. Where provincial and federal environmental governance has failed, Indigenous communities are repoliticizing colonial decision-making processes to shift jurisdiction towards Indigenous processes that institutionalize responsibilities for and relationships with water. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Canada British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Water 11 3 571
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
spellingShingle water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
Deborah Curran
Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
topic_facet water governance
politics
law
decision-making processes
governmentalities
UNDRIP
free
prior and informed consent
FPIC
groundwater
environmental flows
environmental assessment
Hydraulic engineering
TC1-978
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
TD201-500
description While international instruments and a few state governments endorse the “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous peoples in decision-making about the water in their traditional territories, most state water governance regimes do not recognize Indigenous water rights and responsibilities. Applying a political ecology lens to the settler colonialism of water governance exposes the continued depoliticizing personality of natural resources decision-making and reveals water as an abstract, static resource in law and governance processes. Most plainly, these decision-making processes inadequately consider environmental flows or cumulative effects and are at odds with both Indigenous governance and social-ecological approaches to watershed management. Using the example of groundwater licensing in British Columbia, Canada as reinforcing colonialism in water governance, this article examines how First Nations are asserting Indigenous rights in response to natural resource decision-making. Both within and outside of colonial governance processes they are establishing administrative and governance structures that express their water laws and jurisdiction. These structures include the Syilx, Nadleh Wut’en and Stellat’en creating standards for water, the Tsleil-Waututh and Stk’emlúpsemc te Secwépemc community assessments of proposed pipeline and mining facilities, and the First Nations of the Nicola Valley planning process based on their own legal traditions. Where provincial and federal environmental governance has failed, Indigenous communities are repoliticizing colonial decision-making processes to shift jurisdiction towards Indigenous processes that institutionalize responsibilities for and relationships with water.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Deborah Curran
author_facet Deborah Curran
author_sort Deborah Curran
title Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_short Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_full Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_fullStr Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Processes of Consent: Repoliticizing Water Governance through Legal Pluralism
title_sort indigenous processes of consent: repoliticizing water governance through legal pluralism
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
https://doaj.org/article/15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
geographic Canada
British Columbia
geographic_facet Canada
British Columbia
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source Water, Vol 11, Iss 3, p 571 (2019)
op_relation http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/3/571
https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4441
2073-4441
doi:10.3390/w11030571
https://doaj.org/article/15d7625ab4514ed2915d9459084c4a3f
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030571
container_title Water
container_volume 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 571
_version_ 1766001862507495424