Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa

This study forms part of a larger project to reconstruct the Mio-Pliocene marine palaeoenvironment along South Africa’s west coast. It documents the shark–cetacean trophic interaction during the Zanclean (5 Ma) at Duinefontein (Koeberg). The damage described on the fragmentary cetacean bones was com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:South African Journal of Science
Main Author: Romala Govender
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2015
Subjects:
Q
H
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453
https://doaj.org/article/1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5 2023-05-15T15:36:59+02:00 Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa Romala Govender 2015-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453 https://doaj.org/article/1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5 EN eng Academy of Science of South Africa https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/3816 https://doaj.org/toc/1996-7489 1996-7489 doi:10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453 https://doaj.org/article/1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5 South African Journal of Science, Vol 111, Iss 11/12, Pp 7-7 (2015) baleen whale odontocete white shark tooth marks Zanclean Science Q Science (General) Q1-390 Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453 2022-12-31T00:26:04Z This study forms part of a larger project to reconstruct the Mio-Pliocene marine palaeoenvironment along South Africa’s west coast. It documents the shark–cetacean trophic interaction during the Zanclean (5 Ma) at Duinefontein (Koeberg). The damage described on the fragmentary cetacean bones was compared with similar damage observed on fossils from Langebaanweg, a Mio-Pliocene site on the west coast of South Africa, and data present in the literature. This comparison showed that the damage was the result of shark bites. The state of preservation makes it difficult to determine if the shark bite marks were the cause of death or as a result of scavenging. The presence of the bite marks on the bone would, however, indicate some degree of skeletonisation. Bite marks on some cranial fragments would suggest that the cetacean’s body was in an inverted position typical of a floating carcass. The preservation of the material suggests that the bones were exposed to wave action resulting in their fragmentation as well as abrasion, polishing and rolling. It also suggests that the cetacean skeletons were exposed for a long time prior to burial. The morphology of the bites suggests that the damage was inflicted by sharks with serrated and unserrated teeth. Shark teeth collected from the deposit include megalodon (Carcharodon megalodon), white (Carcharodon carcharias) as well as mako (Isurus sp. and Cosmopolitodus hastalis) sharks, making these sharks the most likely predators/scavengers. Article in Journal/Newspaper baleen whale Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles South African Journal of Science Volume 111 Number 11/12
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic baleen whale
odontocete
white shark
tooth marks
Zanclean
Science
Q
Science (General)
Q1-390
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle baleen whale
odontocete
white shark
tooth marks
Zanclean
Science
Q
Science (General)
Q1-390
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Romala Govender
Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa
topic_facet baleen whale
odontocete
white shark
tooth marks
Zanclean
Science
Q
Science (General)
Q1-390
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
description This study forms part of a larger project to reconstruct the Mio-Pliocene marine palaeoenvironment along South Africa’s west coast. It documents the shark–cetacean trophic interaction during the Zanclean (5 Ma) at Duinefontein (Koeberg). The damage described on the fragmentary cetacean bones was compared with similar damage observed on fossils from Langebaanweg, a Mio-Pliocene site on the west coast of South Africa, and data present in the literature. This comparison showed that the damage was the result of shark bites. The state of preservation makes it difficult to determine if the shark bite marks were the cause of death or as a result of scavenging. The presence of the bite marks on the bone would, however, indicate some degree of skeletonisation. Bite marks on some cranial fragments would suggest that the cetacean’s body was in an inverted position typical of a floating carcass. The preservation of the material suggests that the bones were exposed to wave action resulting in their fragmentation as well as abrasion, polishing and rolling. It also suggests that the cetacean skeletons were exposed for a long time prior to burial. The morphology of the bites suggests that the damage was inflicted by sharks with serrated and unserrated teeth. Shark teeth collected from the deposit include megalodon (Carcharodon megalodon), white (Carcharodon carcharias) as well as mako (Isurus sp. and Cosmopolitodus hastalis) sharks, making these sharks the most likely predators/scavengers.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Romala Govender
author_facet Romala Govender
author_sort Romala Govender
title Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa
title_short Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa
title_full Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa
title_fullStr Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Shark–Cetacean trophic interaction, Duinefontein, Koeberg, (5 Ma), South Africa
title_sort shark–cetacean trophic interaction, duinefontein, koeberg, (5 ma), south africa
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453
https://doaj.org/article/1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5
genre baleen whale
genre_facet baleen whale
op_source South African Journal of Science, Vol 111, Iss 11/12, Pp 7-7 (2015)
op_relation https://www.sajs.co.za/article/view/3816
https://doaj.org/toc/1996-7489
1996-7489
doi:10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453
https://doaj.org/article/1574764de2b74f19adcabca7e81d09d5
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2015/20140453
container_title South African Journal of Science
container_volume Volume 111
container_issue Number 11/12
_version_ 1766367415612997632