Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.

Logistic regression models-or "sightability models"-fit to detection/non-detection data from marked individuals are often used to adjust for visibility bias in later detection-only surveys, with population abundance estimated using a modified Horvitz-Thompson (mHT) estimator. More recently...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS ONE
Main Authors: Althea A ArchMiller, Robert M Dorazio, Katherine St Clair, John R Fieberg
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018
Subjects:
R
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190706
https://doaj.org/article/14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86 2023-05-15T13:13:26+02:00 Time series sightability modeling of animal populations. Althea A ArchMiller Robert M Dorazio Katherine St Clair John R Fieberg 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190706 https://doaj.org/article/14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86 EN eng Public Library of Science (PLoS) http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5766105?pdf=render https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203 1932-6203 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190706 https://doaj.org/article/14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86 PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 1, p e0190706 (2018) Medicine R Science Q article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190706 2022-12-31T12:26:39Z Logistic regression models-or "sightability models"-fit to detection/non-detection data from marked individuals are often used to adjust for visibility bias in later detection-only surveys, with population abundance estimated using a modified Horvitz-Thompson (mHT) estimator. More recently, a model-based alternative for analyzing combined detection/non-detection and detection-only data was developed. This approach seemed promising, since it resulted in similar estimates as the mHT when applied to data from moose (Alces alces) surveys in Minnesota. More importantly, it provided a framework for developing flexible models for analyzing multiyear detection-only survey data in combination with detection/non-detection data. During initial attempts to extend the model-based approach to multiple years of detection-only data, we found that estimates of detection probabilities and population abundance were sensitive to the amount of detection-only data included in the combined (detection/non-detection and detection-only) analysis. Subsequently, we developed a robust hierarchical modeling approach where sightability model parameters are informed only by the detection/non-detection data, and we used this approach to fit a fixed-effects model (FE model) with year-specific parameters and a temporally-smoothed model (TS model) that shares information across years via random effects and a temporal spline. The abundance estimates from the TS model were more precise, with decreased interannual variability relative to the FE model and mHT abundance estimates, illustrating the potential benefits from model-based approaches that allow information to be shared across years. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles PLOS ONE 13 1 e0190706
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Althea A ArchMiller
Robert M Dorazio
Katherine St Clair
John R Fieberg
Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
topic_facet Medicine
R
Science
Q
description Logistic regression models-or "sightability models"-fit to detection/non-detection data from marked individuals are often used to adjust for visibility bias in later detection-only surveys, with population abundance estimated using a modified Horvitz-Thompson (mHT) estimator. More recently, a model-based alternative for analyzing combined detection/non-detection and detection-only data was developed. This approach seemed promising, since it resulted in similar estimates as the mHT when applied to data from moose (Alces alces) surveys in Minnesota. More importantly, it provided a framework for developing flexible models for analyzing multiyear detection-only survey data in combination with detection/non-detection data. During initial attempts to extend the model-based approach to multiple years of detection-only data, we found that estimates of detection probabilities and population abundance were sensitive to the amount of detection-only data included in the combined (detection/non-detection and detection-only) analysis. Subsequently, we developed a robust hierarchical modeling approach where sightability model parameters are informed only by the detection/non-detection data, and we used this approach to fit a fixed-effects model (FE model) with year-specific parameters and a temporally-smoothed model (TS model) that shares information across years via random effects and a temporal spline. The abundance estimates from the TS model were more precise, with decreased interannual variability relative to the FE model and mHT abundance estimates, illustrating the potential benefits from model-based approaches that allow information to be shared across years.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Althea A ArchMiller
Robert M Dorazio
Katherine St Clair
John R Fieberg
author_facet Althea A ArchMiller
Robert M Dorazio
Katherine St Clair
John R Fieberg
author_sort Althea A ArchMiller
title Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
title_short Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
title_full Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
title_fullStr Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
title_full_unstemmed Time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
title_sort time series sightability modeling of animal populations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190706
https://doaj.org/article/14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 1, p e0190706 (2018)
op_relation http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5766105?pdf=render
https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203
1932-6203
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190706
https://doaj.org/article/14f01f68abd14773ad779fbf5aa4ac86
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190706
container_title PLOS ONE
container_volume 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0190706
_version_ 1766258361469239296