Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings

The near proportionality between cumulative CO _2 emissions and change in near surface temperature can be used to define a carbon budget: a finite quantity of carbon that can be burned associated with a chosen ‘safe’ temperature change threshold. Here we evaluate the sensitivity of this carbon budge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Andrew H MacDougall, Kirsten Zickfeld, Reto Knutti, H Damon Matthews
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2015
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003
https://doaj.org/article/14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588 2023-09-05T13:22:31+02:00 Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings Andrew H MacDougall Kirsten Zickfeld Reto Knutti H Damon Matthews 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 https://doaj.org/article/14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588 EN eng IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 1748-9326 https://doaj.org/article/14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588 Environmental Research Letters, Vol 10, Iss 12, p 125003 (2015) carbon budget TCRE climate change Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Science Q Physics QC1-999 article 2015 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003 2023-08-13T00:37:50Z The near proportionality between cumulative CO _2 emissions and change in near surface temperature can be used to define a carbon budget: a finite quantity of carbon that can be burned associated with a chosen ‘safe’ temperature change threshold. Here we evaluate the sensitivity of this carbon budget to permafrost carbon dynamics and changes in non-CO _2 forcings. The carbon budget for 2.0 ${}^{\circ }{\rm{C}}$ of warming is reduced from 1320 Pg C when considering only forcing from CO _2 to 810 Pg C when considering permafrost carbon feedbacks as well as other anthropogenic contributions to climate change. We also examined net carbon budgets following an overshoot of and return to a warming target. That is, the net cumulative CO _2 emissions at the point in time a warming target is restored following artificial removal of CO _2 from the atmosphere to cool the climate back to a chosen temperature target. These overshoot net carbon budgets are consistently smaller than the conventional carbon budgets. Overall carbon budgets persist as a robust and simple conceptual framework to relate the principle cause of climate change to the impacts of climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Environmental Research Letters 10 12 125003
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic carbon budget
TCRE
climate change
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle carbon budget
TCRE
climate change
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Andrew H MacDougall
Kirsten Zickfeld
Reto Knutti
H Damon Matthews
Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings
topic_facet carbon budget
TCRE
climate change
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
description The near proportionality between cumulative CO _2 emissions and change in near surface temperature can be used to define a carbon budget: a finite quantity of carbon that can be burned associated with a chosen ‘safe’ temperature change threshold. Here we evaluate the sensitivity of this carbon budget to permafrost carbon dynamics and changes in non-CO _2 forcings. The carbon budget for 2.0 ${}^{\circ }{\rm{C}}$ of warming is reduced from 1320 Pg C when considering only forcing from CO _2 to 810 Pg C when considering permafrost carbon feedbacks as well as other anthropogenic contributions to climate change. We also examined net carbon budgets following an overshoot of and return to a warming target. That is, the net cumulative CO _2 emissions at the point in time a warming target is restored following artificial removal of CO _2 from the atmosphere to cool the climate back to a chosen temperature target. These overshoot net carbon budgets are consistently smaller than the conventional carbon budgets. Overall carbon budgets persist as a robust and simple conceptual framework to relate the principle cause of climate change to the impacts of climate change.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Andrew H MacDougall
Kirsten Zickfeld
Reto Knutti
H Damon Matthews
author_facet Andrew H MacDougall
Kirsten Zickfeld
Reto Knutti
H Damon Matthews
author_sort Andrew H MacDougall
title Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings
title_short Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings
title_full Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings
title_fullStr Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO2 forcings
title_sort sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-co2 forcings
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003
https://doaj.org/article/14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Vol 10, Iss 12, p 125003 (2015)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003
1748-9326
https://doaj.org/article/14d5354928e040889d3ad4bb2d198588
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125003
container_title Environmental Research Letters
container_volume 10
container_issue 12
container_start_page 125003
_version_ 1776203037679812608