Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?

This article provides a detailed legal comparison of the free movement and residence rights, including mutual recognition of qualifications and social security co-ordination, accorded to nationals of the four EFTA States: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The first half considers the e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Main Author: Matthew Alexander Jay
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2012
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152
https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 2023-05-15T16:49:51+02:00 Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible? Matthew Alexander Jay 2012-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 EN eng University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/152 https://doaj.org/toc/1845-5662 https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9958 doi:10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 1845-5662 1848-9958 https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Vol 8, Pp 78-115 (2012) free movement residence mutual recognition of qualifications social security co-ordination efta eea agreement eu-swiss framework directive 2004/38 Law K Law of Europe KJ-KKZ article 2012 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152 2022-12-31T08:56:20Z This article provides a detailed legal comparison of the free movement and residence rights, including mutual recognition of qualifications and social security co-ordination, accorded to nationals of the four EFTA States: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The first half considers the extent to which the EEA Agreement, which relates to the former three countries, secures homogeneity in this area of law; and the second half looks at the EU-Swiss framework for the same purposes. It concludes that the EEA framework, through the activism of its Court, goes a long way to securing homogeneity—to the extent of equating nationality of an EEA-EFTA state with Union citizenship, at least for the purposes of movement and residence. The Swiss system, by contrast, fails miserably in this regard as the rights under the Swiss agreement still mirror those prior to Directive 2004/38. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 8 8
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic free movement
residence
mutual recognition of qualifications
social security co-ordination
efta
eea agreement
eu-swiss framework
directive 2004/38
Law
K
Law of Europe
KJ-KKZ
spellingShingle free movement
residence
mutual recognition of qualifications
social security co-ordination
efta
eea agreement
eu-swiss framework
directive 2004/38
Law
K
Law of Europe
KJ-KKZ
Matthew Alexander Jay
Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
topic_facet free movement
residence
mutual recognition of qualifications
social security co-ordination
efta
eea agreement
eu-swiss framework
directive 2004/38
Law
K
Law of Europe
KJ-KKZ
description This article provides a detailed legal comparison of the free movement and residence rights, including mutual recognition of qualifications and social security co-ordination, accorded to nationals of the four EFTA States: Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. The first half considers the extent to which the EEA Agreement, which relates to the former three countries, secures homogeneity in this area of law; and the second half looks at the EU-Swiss framework for the same purposes. It concludes that the EEA framework, through the activism of its Court, goes a long way to securing homogeneity—to the extent of equating nationality of an EEA-EFTA state with Union citizenship, at least for the purposes of movement and residence. The Swiss system, by contrast, fails miserably in this regard as the rights under the Swiss agreement still mirror those prior to Directive 2004/38.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Matthew Alexander Jay
author_facet Matthew Alexander Jay
author_sort Matthew Alexander Jay
title Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
title_short Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
title_full Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
title_fullStr Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
title_full_unstemmed Homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: Mission Impossible?
title_sort homogeneity, the free movement of persons and integration without membership: mission impossible?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152
https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Vol 8, Pp 78-115 (2012)
op_relation https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/152
https://doaj.org/toc/1845-5662
https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9958
doi:10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152
1845-5662
1848-9958
https://doaj.org/article/1470c7b311cd418e88475738de71a761
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.08.2012.152
container_title Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
container_volume 8
container_issue 8
_version_ 1766040035975495680