The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities?
Most stream bioassessment and biodiversity surveys are currently based on morphological identification of communities. However, DNA metabarcoding is emerging as a fast and cost-effective alternative for species identification. We compared both methods in a survey of benthic macroinvertebrate communi...
Published in: | Metabarcoding and Metagenomics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 https://doaj.org/article/13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 2023-05-15T17:42:41+02:00 The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? Jarno Turunen Heikki Mykrä Vasco Elbrecht Dirk Steinke Thomas Braukmann Jukka Aroviita 2021-07-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 https://doaj.org/article/13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 EN eng Pensoft Publishers https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/68938/download/pdf/ https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/68938/download/xml/ https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/68938/ https://doaj.org/toc/2534-9708 doi:10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 2534-9708 https://doaj.org/article/13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, Vol 5, Iss , Pp 99-110 (2021) Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 2022-12-31T08:39:45Z Most stream bioassessment and biodiversity surveys are currently based on morphological identification of communities. However, DNA metabarcoding is emerging as a fast and cost-effective alternative for species identification. We compared both methods in a survey of benthic macroinvertebrate communities across 36 stream sites in northern Finland. We identified 291 taxa of which 62% were identified only by DNA metabarcoding. DNA metabarcoding produced extensive species level inventories for groups (Oligochaeta, Chironomidae, Simuliidae, Limoniidae and Limnephilidae), for which morphological identification was not feasible due to the high level of expertise needed. Metabarcoding also provided more insightful taxonomic information on the occurrence of three red-listed vulnerable or data deficient species, the discovery of two likely cryptic and potentially new species to Finland and species information of insect genera at an early larval stage that could not be separated morphologically. However, it systematically failed to reliably detect the occurrence of gastropods that were easily identified morphologically. The impact of mining on community structure could only be shown using DNA metabarcoding data which suggests that the finer taxonomic detail can improve detection of subtle impacts. Both methods generally exhibited similar strength of community-environment relationships, but DNA metabarcoding showed better performance with presence/absence data than with relative DNA sequence abundances. Our results suggest that DNA metabarcoding holds a promise for future anthropogenic impact assessments, although, in our case, the performance did not improve much from the morphological species identification. The key advantage of DNA metabarcoding lies in efficient biodiversity surveys, taxonomical studies and applications in conservation biology. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northern Finland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Ecology QH540-549.5 |
spellingShingle |
Ecology QH540-549.5 Jarno Turunen Heikki Mykrä Vasco Elbrecht Dirk Steinke Thomas Braukmann Jukka Aroviita The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
topic_facet |
Ecology QH540-549.5 |
description |
Most stream bioassessment and biodiversity surveys are currently based on morphological identification of communities. However, DNA metabarcoding is emerging as a fast and cost-effective alternative for species identification. We compared both methods in a survey of benthic macroinvertebrate communities across 36 stream sites in northern Finland. We identified 291 taxa of which 62% were identified only by DNA metabarcoding. DNA metabarcoding produced extensive species level inventories for groups (Oligochaeta, Chironomidae, Simuliidae, Limoniidae and Limnephilidae), for which morphological identification was not feasible due to the high level of expertise needed. Metabarcoding also provided more insightful taxonomic information on the occurrence of three red-listed vulnerable or data deficient species, the discovery of two likely cryptic and potentially new species to Finland and species information of insect genera at an early larval stage that could not be separated morphologically. However, it systematically failed to reliably detect the occurrence of gastropods that were easily identified morphologically. The impact of mining on community structure could only be shown using DNA metabarcoding data which suggests that the finer taxonomic detail can improve detection of subtle impacts. Both methods generally exhibited similar strength of community-environment relationships, but DNA metabarcoding showed better performance with presence/absence data than with relative DNA sequence abundances. Our results suggest that DNA metabarcoding holds a promise for future anthropogenic impact assessments, although, in our case, the performance did not improve much from the morphological species identification. The key advantage of DNA metabarcoding lies in efficient biodiversity surveys, taxonomical studies and applications in conservation biology. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Jarno Turunen Heikki Mykrä Vasco Elbrecht Dirk Steinke Thomas Braukmann Jukka Aroviita |
author_facet |
Jarno Turunen Heikki Mykrä Vasco Elbrecht Dirk Steinke Thomas Braukmann Jukka Aroviita |
author_sort |
Jarno Turunen |
title |
The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
title_short |
The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
title_full |
The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
title_fullStr |
The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The power of metabarcoding: Can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
title_sort |
power of metabarcoding: can we improve bioassessment and biodiversity surveys of stream macroinvertebrate communities? |
publisher |
Pensoft Publishers |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 https://doaj.org/article/13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 |
genre |
Northern Finland |
genre_facet |
Northern Finland |
op_source |
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, Vol 5, Iss , Pp 99-110 (2021) |
op_relation |
https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/68938/download/pdf/ https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/68938/download/xml/ https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/68938/ https://doaj.org/toc/2534-9708 doi:10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 2534-9708 https://doaj.org/article/13d66c51362448e6b8d3b06ac44b3493 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.68938 |
container_title |
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics |
container_volume |
5 |
_version_ |
1766144590868381696 |