Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar

Incoherent scatter radars measure ionosphere parameters using modified Thomson scatter from free electrons in the target (see e.g. Hagfors, 1997). The integrated cross section of the ionospheric scatterers is extremely small and the measurements can easily be disturbed by signals returned by unwante...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annales Geophysicae
Main Authors: T. Turunen, J. Markkanen, A. P. van Eyken
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2000
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0
https://doaj.org/article/12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41 2023-05-15T16:04:34+02:00 Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar T. Turunen J. Markkanen A. P. van Eyken 2000-09-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0 https://doaj.org/article/12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/1242/2000/angeo-18-1242-2000.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0992-7689 https://doaj.org/toc/1432-0576 doi:10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0 0992-7689 1432-0576 https://doaj.org/article/12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41 Annales Geophysicae, Vol 18, Pp 1242-1247 (2000) Science Q Physics QC1-999 Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2000 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0 2022-12-31T09:41:02Z Incoherent scatter radars measure ionosphere parameters using modified Thomson scatter from free electrons in the target (see e.g. Hagfors, 1997). The integrated cross section of the ionospheric scatterers is extremely small and the measurements can easily be disturbed by signals returned by unwanted targets. Ground clutter signals, entering via the antenna side lobes, can render measurements at the nearest target ranges totally impossible. The EISCAT Svalbard Radar (ESR), which started measurements in 1996, suffers from severe ground clutter and the ionosphere cannot be measured in any simple manner at ranges less than about 120–150 km, depending on the modulation employed. If the target and clutter signals have different, and clearly identifiable, properties then, in principle, there are always ways to eliminate the clutter. In incoherent scatter measurements, differences in the coherence times of the wanted and unwanted signals can be used for clutter cancellation. The clutter cancellation must be applied to all modulations, usually alternating codes in modern experiments, used for shorter ranges. Excellent results have been obtained at the ESR using a simple pulse-to-pulse clutter subtraction method, but there are also other possibilities. Key words: Radio science (ionospheric physics; signal processing; instruments and techniques) Article in Journal/Newspaper EISCAT Svalbard Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Svalbard Hagfors ENVELOPE(13.290,13.290,65.822,65.822) Annales Geophysicae 18 9 1242 1247
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
T. Turunen
J. Markkanen
A. P. van Eyken
Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar
topic_facet Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description Incoherent scatter radars measure ionosphere parameters using modified Thomson scatter from free electrons in the target (see e.g. Hagfors, 1997). The integrated cross section of the ionospheric scatterers is extremely small and the measurements can easily be disturbed by signals returned by unwanted targets. Ground clutter signals, entering via the antenna side lobes, can render measurements at the nearest target ranges totally impossible. The EISCAT Svalbard Radar (ESR), which started measurements in 1996, suffers from severe ground clutter and the ionosphere cannot be measured in any simple manner at ranges less than about 120–150 km, depending on the modulation employed. If the target and clutter signals have different, and clearly identifiable, properties then, in principle, there are always ways to eliminate the clutter. In incoherent scatter measurements, differences in the coherence times of the wanted and unwanted signals can be used for clutter cancellation. The clutter cancellation must be applied to all modulations, usually alternating codes in modern experiments, used for shorter ranges. Excellent results have been obtained at the ESR using a simple pulse-to-pulse clutter subtraction method, but there are also other possibilities. Key words: Radio science (ionospheric physics; signal processing; instruments and techniques)
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author T. Turunen
J. Markkanen
A. P. van Eyken
author_facet T. Turunen
J. Markkanen
A. P. van Eyken
author_sort T. Turunen
title Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar
title_short Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar
title_full Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar
title_fullStr Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar
title_full_unstemmed Ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for EISCAT Svalbard radar
title_sort ground clutter cancellation in incoherent radars: solutions for eiscat svalbard radar
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2000
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0
https://doaj.org/article/12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41
long_lat ENVELOPE(13.290,13.290,65.822,65.822)
geographic Svalbard
Hagfors
geographic_facet Svalbard
Hagfors
genre EISCAT
Svalbard
genre_facet EISCAT
Svalbard
op_source Annales Geophysicae, Vol 18, Pp 1242-1247 (2000)
op_relation https://www.ann-geophys.net/18/1242/2000/angeo-18-1242-2000.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/0992-7689
https://doaj.org/toc/1432-0576
doi:10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0
0992-7689
1432-0576
https://doaj.org/article/12f35958075f4ca49ea72da241a77c41
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1242-0
container_title Annales Geophysicae
container_volume 18
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1242
op_container_end_page 1247
_version_ 1766400155028815872