Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake

The zooplankton communities of two basins of a large lake, Lake Constance, were compared during the years 2002 and 2003. The two basins differ in morphology, physical and chemical conditions. The Upper Lake basin has a surface area of 470 km2, a mean depth of 100 and a maximum depth of 250 m; the Lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Limnology
Main Authors: Gerhard MAIER, Martin PFEIFFER, Hans Bernd STICH
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2005
Subjects:
G
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129
https://doaj.org/article/1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175 2023-05-15T18:49:42+02:00 Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake Gerhard MAIER Martin PFEIFFER Hans Bernd STICH 2005-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129 https://doaj.org/article/1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175 EN eng PAGEPress Publications http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/252 https://doaj.org/toc/1129-5767 https://doaj.org/toc/1723-8633 doi:10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129 1129-5767 1723-8633 https://doaj.org/article/1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175 Journal of Limnology, Vol 64, Iss 2, Pp 129-138 (2005) zooplankton community crustacean Rotatoria ordination Lake Constance Upper Lake Lower Lake Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Physical geography GB3-5030 Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2005 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129 2022-12-31T01:35:00Z The zooplankton communities of two basins of a large lake, Lake Constance, were compared during the years 2002 and 2003. The two basins differ in morphology, physical and chemical conditions. The Upper Lake basin has a surface area of 470 km2, a mean depth of 100 and a maximum depth of 250 m; the Lower Lake basin has a surface area of 62 km2, a mean depth of only 13 and a maximum depth of 40 m. Nutrient, chlorophyll-a concentrations and mean temperatures are somewhat higher in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. Total abundance of rotifers (number per m2 lake surface) was higher and rotifer development started earlier in the year in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. Total abundance of crustaceans was higher in the Upper Lake in the year 2002; in the year 2003 no difference in abundance could be detected between the lake basins, although in summer crustacean abundance was higher in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. Crustacean communities differed significantly between lake basins while there was no apparent difference in rotifer communities. In the Lower Lake small crustaceans, like Bosmina spp., Ceriodaphnia pulchella and Thermocyclops oithonoides prevailed. Abundance (number per m2 lake surface) of predatory cladocerans, large daphnids and large copepods was much lower in the Lower than in the Upper Lake, in particular during the summer months. Ordination with nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS) separated communities of both lakes along gradients that correlated with temperature and chlorophyll a concentration. Clutches of copepods were larger in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. No difference could be detected in clutch size of large daphnids between lake basins. Our results show that zooplankton communities in different basins of Lake Constance can be very different. They further suggest that the lack of large crustaceans in particular the lack of large predatory cladocerans in the Lower Lake can have negative effects on growth and reproduction of zooplanktivorous European whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Copepods Rotifer Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Lower Lake ENVELOPE(-129.290,-129.290,53.428,53.428) Journal of Limnology 64 2 129
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic zooplankton community
crustacean
Rotatoria
ordination
Lake Constance
Upper Lake
Lower Lake
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle zooplankton community
crustacean
Rotatoria
ordination
Lake Constance
Upper Lake
Lower Lake
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Gerhard MAIER
Martin PFEIFFER
Hans Bernd STICH
Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake
topic_facet zooplankton community
crustacean
Rotatoria
ordination
Lake Constance
Upper Lake
Lower Lake
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description The zooplankton communities of two basins of a large lake, Lake Constance, were compared during the years 2002 and 2003. The two basins differ in morphology, physical and chemical conditions. The Upper Lake basin has a surface area of 470 km2, a mean depth of 100 and a maximum depth of 250 m; the Lower Lake basin has a surface area of 62 km2, a mean depth of only 13 and a maximum depth of 40 m. Nutrient, chlorophyll-a concentrations and mean temperatures are somewhat higher in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. Total abundance of rotifers (number per m2 lake surface) was higher and rotifer development started earlier in the year in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. Total abundance of crustaceans was higher in the Upper Lake in the year 2002; in the year 2003 no difference in abundance could be detected between the lake basins, although in summer crustacean abundance was higher in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. Crustacean communities differed significantly between lake basins while there was no apparent difference in rotifer communities. In the Lower Lake small crustaceans, like Bosmina spp., Ceriodaphnia pulchella and Thermocyclops oithonoides prevailed. Abundance (number per m2 lake surface) of predatory cladocerans, large daphnids and large copepods was much lower in the Lower than in the Upper Lake, in particular during the summer months. Ordination with nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS) separated communities of both lakes along gradients that correlated with temperature and chlorophyll a concentration. Clutches of copepods were larger in the Lower than in the Upper Lake. No difference could be detected in clutch size of large daphnids between lake basins. Our results show that zooplankton communities in different basins of Lake Constance can be very different. They further suggest that the lack of large crustaceans in particular the lack of large predatory cladocerans in the Lower Lake can have negative effects on growth and reproduction of zooplanktivorous European whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus, ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gerhard MAIER
Martin PFEIFFER
Hans Bernd STICH
author_facet Gerhard MAIER
Martin PFEIFFER
Hans Bernd STICH
author_sort Gerhard MAIER
title Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake
title_short Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake
title_full Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake
title_fullStr Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake
title_full_unstemmed Zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, Lake Constance: comparison between the Upper and the Lower Lake
title_sort zooplankton communities in a large prealpine lake, lake constance: comparison between the upper and the lower lake
publisher PAGEPress Publications
publishDate 2005
url https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129
https://doaj.org/article/1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175
long_lat ENVELOPE(-129.290,-129.290,53.428,53.428)
geographic Lower Lake
geographic_facet Lower Lake
genre Copepods
Rotifer
genre_facet Copepods
Rotifer
op_source Journal of Limnology, Vol 64, Iss 2, Pp 129-138 (2005)
op_relation http://www.jlimnol.it/index.php/jlimnol/article/view/252
https://doaj.org/toc/1129-5767
https://doaj.org/toc/1723-8633
doi:10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129
1129-5767
1723-8633
https://doaj.org/article/1283025c11f74f3f92174e7af165e175
op_doi https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2005.129
container_title Journal of Limnology
container_volume 64
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
_version_ 1766243302716211200