A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism
In 2016, Teemu Ruskola's book Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law was published in translation in China. This essay analyzes the Chinese reception of this book. Originally addressed to a North Atlantic readership, Legal Orientalism examines critically the asymmetric rela...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | German English |
Published: |
Ancilla Iuris
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26031/2021.146 https://doaj.org/article/11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 2023-05-15T17:31:29+02:00 A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism Teemu Ruskola 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.26031/2021.146 https://doaj.org/article/11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 DE EN ger eng Ancilla Iuris https://www.anci.ch/articles/690 https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 doi:10.26031/2021.146 1661-8610 https://doaj.org/article/11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 Ancilla Iuris, Vol 2021, Pp 146-152 (2021) Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 article 2021 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.26031/2021.146 2022-12-31T05:04:19Z In 2016, Teemu Ruskola's book Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law was published in translation in China. This essay analyzes the Chinese reception of this book. Originally addressed to a North Atlantic readership, Legal Orientalism examines critically the asymmetric relationship in which Euro-American law and Chinese law stand to one another, the former regarding itself as an embodiment of universal values while viewing the latter's as culturally particular ones. The essay explores what happens when a “Western” work of self-criticism is transmitted to an “Eastern” audience. In this context, it analyzes the politics of self-Orientalism, Oriental legalism, and the comparative method. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
German English |
topic |
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 |
spellingShingle |
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 Teemu Ruskola A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism |
topic_facet |
Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 |
description |
In 2016, Teemu Ruskola's book Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law was published in translation in China. This essay analyzes the Chinese reception of this book. Originally addressed to a North Atlantic readership, Legal Orientalism examines critically the asymmetric relationship in which Euro-American law and Chinese law stand to one another, the former regarding itself as an embodiment of universal values while viewing the latter's as culturally particular ones. The essay explores what happens when a “Western” work of self-criticism is transmitted to an “Eastern” audience. In this context, it analyzes the politics of self-Orientalism, Oriental legalism, and the comparative method. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Teemu Ruskola |
author_facet |
Teemu Ruskola |
author_sort |
Teemu Ruskola |
title |
A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism |
title_short |
A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism |
title_full |
A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism |
title_fullStr |
A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Reader’s Guide to Legal Orientalism |
title_sort |
reader’s guide to legal orientalism |
publisher |
Ancilla Iuris |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.26031/2021.146 https://doaj.org/article/11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_source |
Ancilla Iuris, Vol 2021, Pp 146-152 (2021) |
op_relation |
https://www.anci.ch/articles/690 https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8610 doi:10.26031/2021.146 1661-8610 https://doaj.org/article/11f06c9cd9e644bf8681eb712dffe778 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.26031/2021.146 |
_version_ |
1766129094655737856 |