Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data

The ice surface temperature (IST) is an important boundary condition for both atmospheric and ocean and sea ice models and for coupled systems. An operational ice surface temperature product using satellite Metop AVHRR infra-red data was developed for MyOcean. The IST can be mapped in clear sky regi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean Science
Main Authors: G. Dybkjær, R. Tonboe, J. L. Høyer
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2012
Subjects:
G
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-959-2012
https://doaj.org/article/1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83 2023-05-15T14:43:52+02:00 Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data G. Dybkjær R. Tonboe J. L. Høyer 2012-11-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-959-2012 https://doaj.org/article/1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83 EN eng Copernicus Publications http://www.ocean-sci.net/8/959/2012/os-8-959-2012.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1812-0784 https://doaj.org/toc/1812-0792 doi:10.5194/os-8-959-2012 1812-0784 1812-0792 https://doaj.org/article/1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83 Ocean Science, Vol 8, Iss 6, Pp 959-970 (2012) Geography. Anthropology. Recreation G Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2012 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-959-2012 2022-12-31T13:55:44Z The ice surface temperature (IST) is an important boundary condition for both atmospheric and ocean and sea ice models and for coupled systems. An operational ice surface temperature product using satellite Metop AVHRR infra-red data was developed for MyOcean. The IST can be mapped in clear sky regions using a split window algorithm specially tuned for sea ice. Clear sky conditions prevail during spring in the Arctic, while persistent cloud cover limits data coverage during summer. The cloud covered regions are detected using the EUMETSAT cloud mask. The Metop IST compares to 2 m temperature at the Greenland ice cap Summit within STD error of 3.14 °C and to Arctic drifting buoy temperature data within STD error of 3.69 °C. A case study reveals that the in situ radiometer data versus satellite IST STD error can be much lower (0.73 °C) and that the different in situ measurements complicate the validation. Differences and variability between Metop IST and in situ data are analysed and discussed. An inter-comparison of Metop IST, numerical weather prediction temperatures and in situ observation indicates large biases between the different quantities. Because of the scarcity of conventional surface temperature or surface air temperature data in the Arctic, the satellite IST data with its relatively good coverage can potentially add valuable information to model analysis for the Arctic atmosphere. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Greenland Ice cap Sea ice Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Greenland Ocean Science 8 6 959 970
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
G. Dybkjær
R. Tonboe
J. L. Høyer
Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data
topic_facet Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
description The ice surface temperature (IST) is an important boundary condition for both atmospheric and ocean and sea ice models and for coupled systems. An operational ice surface temperature product using satellite Metop AVHRR infra-red data was developed for MyOcean. The IST can be mapped in clear sky regions using a split window algorithm specially tuned for sea ice. Clear sky conditions prevail during spring in the Arctic, while persistent cloud cover limits data coverage during summer. The cloud covered regions are detected using the EUMETSAT cloud mask. The Metop IST compares to 2 m temperature at the Greenland ice cap Summit within STD error of 3.14 °C and to Arctic drifting buoy temperature data within STD error of 3.69 °C. A case study reveals that the in situ radiometer data versus satellite IST STD error can be much lower (0.73 °C) and that the different in situ measurements complicate the validation. Differences and variability between Metop IST and in situ data are analysed and discussed. An inter-comparison of Metop IST, numerical weather prediction temperatures and in situ observation indicates large biases between the different quantities. Because of the scarcity of conventional surface temperature or surface air temperature data in the Arctic, the satellite IST data with its relatively good coverage can potentially add valuable information to model analysis for the Arctic atmosphere.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author G. Dybkjær
R. Tonboe
J. L. Høyer
author_facet G. Dybkjær
R. Tonboe
J. L. Høyer
author_sort G. Dybkjær
title Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data
title_short Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data
title_full Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data
title_fullStr Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data
title_full_unstemmed Arctic surface temperatures from Metop AVHRR compared to in situ ocean and land data
title_sort arctic surface temperatures from metop avhrr compared to in situ ocean and land data
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-959-2012
https://doaj.org/article/1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
Greenland
Ice cap
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Greenland
Ice cap
Sea ice
op_source Ocean Science, Vol 8, Iss 6, Pp 959-970 (2012)
op_relation http://www.ocean-sci.net/8/959/2012/os-8-959-2012.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1812-0784
https://doaj.org/toc/1812-0792
doi:10.5194/os-8-959-2012
1812-0784
1812-0792
https://doaj.org/article/1116a32b6c1d44cf9e52c03271544e83
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-959-2012
container_title Ocean Science
container_volume 8
container_issue 6
container_start_page 959
op_container_end_page 970
_version_ 1766315447859281920