Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry

Satellite and airborne observations of surface elevation are critical in understanding climatic and glaciological processes and quantifying their impact on changes in ice masses and sea level contribution. With the growing number of dedicated airborne campaigns and experimental and operational satel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Authors: Alex Horton, Martin Ewart, Noel Gourmelen, Xavier Fettweis, Amos Storkey
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
https://doaj.org/article/10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df 2023-05-15T16:29:35+02:00 Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry Alex Horton Martin Ewart Noel Gourmelen Xavier Fettweis Amos Storkey 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210 https://doaj.org/article/10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/24/6210 https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292 doi:10.3390/rs14246210 2072-4292 https://doaj.org/article/10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df Remote Sensing, Vol 14, Iss 6210, p 6210 (2022) SARIn interferometry CryoSat swath ICESat-2 IceBridge Science Q article 2022 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210 2022-12-30T19:30:26Z Satellite and airborne observations of surface elevation are critical in understanding climatic and glaciological processes and quantifying their impact on changes in ice masses and sea level contribution. With the growing number of dedicated airborne campaigns and experimental and operational satellite missions, the science community has access to unprecedented and ever-increasing data. Combining elevation datasets allows potentially greater spatial-temporal coverage and improved accuracy; however, combining data from different sensor types and acquisition modes is difficult by differences in intrinsic sensor properties and processing methods. This study focuses on the combination of elevation measurements derived from ICESat-2 and Operation IceBridge LIDAR instruments and from CryoSat-2’s novel interferometric radar altimeter over Greenland. We develop a deep neural network based on sub-waveform information from CryoSat-2, elevation differences between radar and LIDAR, and additional inputs representing local geophysical information. A time series of maps are created showing observed LIDAR-radar differences and neural network model predictions. Mean LIDAR vs. interferometric radar adjustments and the broad spatial and temporal trends thereof are recreated by the neural network. The neural network also predicts radar-LIDAR differences with respect to waveform parameters better than a simple linear model; however, point level adjustments and the magnitudes of the spatial and temporal trends are underestimated. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Greenland Remote Sensing 14 24 6210
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic SARIn
interferometry
CryoSat
swath
ICESat-2
IceBridge
Science
Q
spellingShingle SARIn
interferometry
CryoSat
swath
ICESat-2
IceBridge
Science
Q
Alex Horton
Martin Ewart
Noel Gourmelen
Xavier Fettweis
Amos Storkey
Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
topic_facet SARIn
interferometry
CryoSat
swath
ICESat-2
IceBridge
Science
Q
description Satellite and airborne observations of surface elevation are critical in understanding climatic and glaciological processes and quantifying their impact on changes in ice masses and sea level contribution. With the growing number of dedicated airborne campaigns and experimental and operational satellite missions, the science community has access to unprecedented and ever-increasing data. Combining elevation datasets allows potentially greater spatial-temporal coverage and improved accuracy; however, combining data from different sensor types and acquisition modes is difficult by differences in intrinsic sensor properties and processing methods. This study focuses on the combination of elevation measurements derived from ICESat-2 and Operation IceBridge LIDAR instruments and from CryoSat-2’s novel interferometric radar altimeter over Greenland. We develop a deep neural network based on sub-waveform information from CryoSat-2, elevation differences between radar and LIDAR, and additional inputs representing local geophysical information. A time series of maps are created showing observed LIDAR-radar differences and neural network model predictions. Mean LIDAR vs. interferometric radar adjustments and the broad spatial and temporal trends thereof are recreated by the neural network. The neural network also predicts radar-LIDAR differences with respect to waveform parameters better than a simple linear model; however, point level adjustments and the magnitudes of the spatial and temporal trends are underestimated.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alex Horton
Martin Ewart
Noel Gourmelen
Xavier Fettweis
Amos Storkey
author_facet Alex Horton
Martin Ewart
Noel Gourmelen
Xavier Fettweis
Amos Storkey
author_sort Alex Horton
title Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_short Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_full Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_fullStr Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_full_unstemmed Using Deep Learning to Model Elevation Differences between Radar and Laser Altimetry
title_sort using deep learning to model elevation differences between radar and laser altimetry
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
https://doaj.org/article/10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_source Remote Sensing, Vol 14, Iss 6210, p 6210 (2022)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/24/6210
https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292
doi:10.3390/rs14246210
2072-4292
https://doaj.org/article/10cfa237cff64197bc3290c94f4ca1df
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246210
container_title Remote Sensing
container_volume 14
container_issue 24
container_start_page 6210
_version_ 1766019297283407872