Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets

An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: J. K. Ridley, E. W. Blockley
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564 2023-05-15T14:47:02+02:00 Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets J. K. Ridley E. W. Blockley 2018-10-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564 EN eng Copernicus Publications https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0416 https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0424 doi:10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 1994-0416 1994-0424 https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564 The Cryosphere, Vol 12, Pp 3355-3360 (2018) Environmental sciences GE1-350 Geology QE1-996.5 article 2018 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018 2022-12-31T12:15:24Z An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management (SRM) to achieve the desired global mean temperatures. It is found that the risk for a seasonally ice-free Arctic is reduced for a target temperature for global warming of 1.5 °C (0.1 %) compared to 2.0 °C (42 %), in general agreement with other methodologies. The SRM produced more ice loss, for a specified global temperature, than for CO 2 mitigation scenarios, as SRM produces a higher polar amplification. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Global warming Sea ice The Cryosphere Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic The Cryosphere 12 10 3355 3360
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
J. K. Ridley
E. W. Blockley
Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
topic_facet Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Geology
QE1-996.5
description An assessment of the risks of a seasonally ice-free Arctic at 1.5 and 2.0 °C global warming above pre-industrial levels is undertaken using model simulations with solar radiation management to achieve the desired temperatures. An ensemble of the CMIP5 model HadGEM2-ES uses solar radiation management (SRM) to achieve the desired global mean temperatures. It is found that the risk for a seasonally ice-free Arctic is reduced for a target temperature for global warming of 1.5 °C (0.1 %) compared to 2.0 °C (42 %), in general agreement with other methodologies. The SRM produced more ice loss, for a specified global temperature, than for CO 2 mitigation scenarios, as SRM produces a higher polar amplification.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author J. K. Ridley
E. W. Blockley
author_facet J. K. Ridley
E. W. Blockley
author_sort J. K. Ridley
title Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_short Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_full Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_fullStr Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_full_unstemmed Brief communication: Solar radiation management not as effective as CO 2 mitigation for Arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °C COP climate targets
title_sort brief communication: solar radiation management not as effective as co 2 mitigation for arctic sea ice loss in hitting the 1.5 and 2 °c cop climate targets
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
The Cryosphere
genre_facet Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
The Cryosphere
op_source The Cryosphere, Vol 12, Pp 3355-3360 (2018)
op_relation https://www.the-cryosphere.net/12/3355/2018/tc-12-3355-2018.pdf
https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0416
https://doaj.org/toc/1994-0424
doi:10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
1994-0416
1994-0424
https://doaj.org/article/1053b1025252439297f7ae709f732564
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3355-2018
container_title The Cryosphere
container_volume 12
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3355
op_container_end_page 3360
_version_ 1766318169823117312