Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex
Echolocating animals reduce their output level and hearing sensitivity with decreasing echo delays, presumably to stabilize the perceived echo intensity during target approaches. In bats, this variation in hearing sensitivity is formed by a call-induced stapedial reflex that tapers off over time aft...
Published in: | Biology Open |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Company of Biologists
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.021469 https://doaj.org/article/1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 2023-05-15T16:33:25+02:00 Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex Asger Emil Munch Schrøder Kristian Beedholm Peter Teglberg Madsen 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.021469 https://doaj.org/article/1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 EN eng The Company of Biologists http://bio.biologists.org/content/6/4/525 https://doaj.org/toc/2046-6390 2046-6390 doi:10.1242/bio.021469 https://doaj.org/article/1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 Biology Open, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 525-529 (2017) Toothed whale Echolocation Stapedial reflex Masking Automatic gain control Hearing Science Q Biology (General) QH301-705.5 article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.021469 2022-12-31T10:08:43Z Echolocating animals reduce their output level and hearing sensitivity with decreasing echo delays, presumably to stabilize the perceived echo intensity during target approaches. In bats, this variation in hearing sensitivity is formed by a call-induced stapedial reflex that tapers off over time after the call. Here, we test the hypothesis that a similar mechanism exists in toothed whales by subjecting a trained harbour porpoise to a series of double sound pulses varying in delay and frequency, while measuring the magnitudes of the evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). We find that the recovery of the ABR to the second pulse is frequency dependent, and that a stapedial reflex therefore cannot account for the reduced hearing sensitivity at short pulse delays. We propose that toothed whale auditory time-varying gain control during echolocation is not enabled by the middle ear as in bats, but rather by frequency-dependent mechanisms such as forward masking and perhaps higher-order control of efferent feedback to the outer hair cells. Article in Journal/Newspaper Harbour porpoise toothed whale toothed whales Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Biology Open |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
Toothed whale Echolocation Stapedial reflex Masking Automatic gain control Hearing Science Q Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
Toothed whale Echolocation Stapedial reflex Masking Automatic gain control Hearing Science Q Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Asger Emil Munch Schrøder Kristian Beedholm Peter Teglberg Madsen Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
topic_facet |
Toothed whale Echolocation Stapedial reflex Masking Automatic gain control Hearing Science Q Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
description |
Echolocating animals reduce their output level and hearing sensitivity with decreasing echo delays, presumably to stabilize the perceived echo intensity during target approaches. In bats, this variation in hearing sensitivity is formed by a call-induced stapedial reflex that tapers off over time after the call. Here, we test the hypothesis that a similar mechanism exists in toothed whales by subjecting a trained harbour porpoise to a series of double sound pulses varying in delay and frequency, while measuring the magnitudes of the evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). We find that the recovery of the ABR to the second pulse is frequency dependent, and that a stapedial reflex therefore cannot account for the reduced hearing sensitivity at short pulse delays. We propose that toothed whale auditory time-varying gain control during echolocation is not enabled by the middle ear as in bats, but rather by frequency-dependent mechanisms such as forward masking and perhaps higher-order control of efferent feedback to the outer hair cells. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Asger Emil Munch Schrøder Kristian Beedholm Peter Teglberg Madsen |
author_facet |
Asger Emil Munch Schrøder Kristian Beedholm Peter Teglberg Madsen |
author_sort |
Asger Emil Munch Schrøder |
title |
Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
title_short |
Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
title_full |
Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
title_fullStr |
Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
title_full_unstemmed |
Time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
title_sort |
time-varying auditory gain control in response to double-pulse stimuli in harbour porpoises is not mediated by a stapedial reflex |
publisher |
The Company of Biologists |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.021469 https://doaj.org/article/1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 |
genre |
Harbour porpoise toothed whale toothed whales |
genre_facet |
Harbour porpoise toothed whale toothed whales |
op_source |
Biology Open, Vol 6, Iss 4, Pp 525-529 (2017) |
op_relation |
http://bio.biologists.org/content/6/4/525 https://doaj.org/toc/2046-6390 2046-6390 doi:10.1242/bio.021469 https://doaj.org/article/1012a86ae16c429dadad03dbeb96b880 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.021469 |
container_title |
Biology Open |
_version_ |
1766023113437347840 |