How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance
Innovations in geodesy enable widespread analysis of glacier surface elevation change and geodetic mass balance. However, coincident glacier area data are less widely available, causing inconsistent handling of glacier area change. Here we quantify the bias introduced into meters water equivalent (m...
Published in: | Journal of Glaciology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.86 https://doaj.org/article/0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c 2024-02-11T09:54:50+01:00 How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance Caitlyn Florentine Louis Sass Christopher McNeil Emily Baker Shad O'Neel https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.86 https://doaj.org/article/0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c EN eng Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143023000862/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2023.86 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c Journal of Glaciology, Pp 1-7 glacier mapping glacier mass balance mountain glaciers Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.86 2024-01-21T01:42:05Z Innovations in geodesy enable widespread analysis of glacier surface elevation change and geodetic mass balance. However, coincident glacier area data are less widely available, causing inconsistent handling of glacier area change. Here we quantify the bias introduced into meters water equivalent (m w.e.) specific geodetic mass balance results when using a fixed, maximum glacier area, and illustrate the bias for five North American glaciers. Sites span latitudes from the northern U.S. Rocky Mountains (48°N) to the Central Alaska Range (63°N) between 1948 and 2021. Results show that fixed (maximum) area treatment subdues the m w.e. mass change signal, underestimating mass balance by up to 19% in our test cases. This bias scales with relative glacier area change and the mass balance magnitude. Thus, the bias for specific geodetic mass balances will be most pronounced across rapidly deglaciating regions. Our analysis underscores the need for temporally resolved glacier area in geodetic mass balance studies. Article in Journal/Newspaper alaska range glacier glaciers Journal of Glaciology Alaska Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Journal of Glaciology 1 19 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
glacier mapping glacier mass balance mountain glaciers Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
spellingShingle |
glacier mapping glacier mass balance mountain glaciers Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 Caitlyn Florentine Louis Sass Christopher McNeil Emily Baker Shad O'Neel How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
topic_facet |
glacier mapping glacier mass balance mountain glaciers Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 |
description |
Innovations in geodesy enable widespread analysis of glacier surface elevation change and geodetic mass balance. However, coincident glacier area data are less widely available, causing inconsistent handling of glacier area change. Here we quantify the bias introduced into meters water equivalent (m w.e.) specific geodetic mass balance results when using a fixed, maximum glacier area, and illustrate the bias for five North American glaciers. Sites span latitudes from the northern U.S. Rocky Mountains (48°N) to the Central Alaska Range (63°N) between 1948 and 2021. Results show that fixed (maximum) area treatment subdues the m w.e. mass change signal, underestimating mass balance by up to 19% in our test cases. This bias scales with relative glacier area change and the mass balance magnitude. Thus, the bias for specific geodetic mass balances will be most pronounced across rapidly deglaciating regions. Our analysis underscores the need for temporally resolved glacier area in geodetic mass balance studies. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Caitlyn Florentine Louis Sass Christopher McNeil Emily Baker Shad O'Neel |
author_facet |
Caitlyn Florentine Louis Sass Christopher McNeil Emily Baker Shad O'Neel |
author_sort |
Caitlyn Florentine |
title |
How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
title_short |
How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
title_full |
How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
title_fullStr |
How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
title_sort |
how to handle glacier area change in geodetic mass balance |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.86 https://doaj.org/article/0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c |
genre |
alaska range glacier glaciers Journal of Glaciology Alaska |
genre_facet |
alaska range glacier glaciers Journal of Glaciology Alaska |
op_source |
Journal of Glaciology, Pp 1-7 |
op_relation |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022143023000862/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2023.86 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/0d079ba073ca42ac8af2133ea1b3592c |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.86 |
container_title |
Journal of Glaciology |
container_start_page |
1 |
op_container_end_page |
19 |
_version_ |
1790607521023524864 |