Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness
This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods. In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among its Arctic competitors...
Published in: | E3S Web of Conferences |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English French |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 https://doaj.org/article/0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 2023-08-27T04:07:12+02:00 Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness Kiselev Vladimir Mikhailovich Danko Tamara Petrovna Chaykovskaya Lubov Aleksandrovna Epshtein Nikita Dmitrievich Petropavlovskaya Alla Vladislavovna Tsenina Ekaterina Vladimirovna 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 https://doaj.org/article/0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 EN FR eng fre EDP Sciences https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/40/e3sconf_escp2023_06017.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 2267-1242 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 https://doaj.org/article/0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 E3S Web of Conferences, Vol 403, p 06017 (2023) arctic zones innovation development index comparative analysis investment attractiveness competitiveness factors Environmental sciences GE1-350 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 2023-08-06T00:38:51Z This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods. In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among its Arctic competitors a comparative analysis was carried out using the index (coefficient) of innovative development of all these research subjects. The study also included the comparison of the parameters that make up its categories (enlarged group indicators) and subcategories (single indicators included in the categories). The results of the comparative analysis showed that for most of the studied indicators included in the subcategories (‘labor productivity’, ‘foundation of new enterprises’, ‘certification’, ‘high-tech production’, etc.), Russia lags far behind Norway and Sweden. Russia’s advantages lie in such subcategories as the development of innovative links between universities and the industrial sector in R&D, trade, diversification, and scope of market. Russia also successfully competes in such subcategories as business environment formation and creation of information and communication technologies. It was noted that these areas are promising for Russia and they should be given great attention to increase the competitiveness of Russia’s Arctic. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Norway E3S Web of Conferences 403 06017 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English French |
topic |
arctic zones innovation development index comparative analysis investment attractiveness competitiveness factors Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
arctic zones innovation development index comparative analysis investment attractiveness competitiveness factors Environmental sciences GE1-350 Kiselev Vladimir Mikhailovich Danko Tamara Petrovna Chaykovskaya Lubov Aleksandrovna Epshtein Nikita Dmitrievich Petropavlovskaya Alla Vladislavovna Tsenina Ekaterina Vladimirovna Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
topic_facet |
arctic zones innovation development index comparative analysis investment attractiveness competitiveness factors Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
description |
This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods. In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among its Arctic competitors a comparative analysis was carried out using the index (coefficient) of innovative development of all these research subjects. The study also included the comparison of the parameters that make up its categories (enlarged group indicators) and subcategories (single indicators included in the categories). The results of the comparative analysis showed that for most of the studied indicators included in the subcategories (‘labor productivity’, ‘foundation of new enterprises’, ‘certification’, ‘high-tech production’, etc.), Russia lags far behind Norway and Sweden. Russia’s advantages lie in such subcategories as the development of innovative links between universities and the industrial sector in R&D, trade, diversification, and scope of market. Russia also successfully competes in such subcategories as business environment formation and creation of information and communication technologies. It was noted that these areas are promising for Russia and they should be given great attention to increase the competitiveness of Russia’s Arctic. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Kiselev Vladimir Mikhailovich Danko Tamara Petrovna Chaykovskaya Lubov Aleksandrovna Epshtein Nikita Dmitrievich Petropavlovskaya Alla Vladislavovna Tsenina Ekaterina Vladimirovna |
author_facet |
Kiselev Vladimir Mikhailovich Danko Tamara Petrovna Chaykovskaya Lubov Aleksandrovna Epshtein Nikita Dmitrievich Petropavlovskaya Alla Vladislavovna Tsenina Ekaterina Vladimirovna |
author_sort |
Kiselev Vladimir Mikhailovich |
title |
Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
title_short |
Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
title_full |
Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
title_fullStr |
Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Innovative development of the Arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
title_sort |
innovative development of the arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 https://doaj.org/article/0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 |
geographic |
Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Norway |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
E3S Web of Conferences, Vol 403, p 06017 (2023) |
op_relation |
https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/40/e3sconf_escp2023_06017.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242 2267-1242 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 https://doaj.org/article/0c104f4c9bf440cab59f6ba79c9d3fb7 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340306017 |
container_title |
E3S Web of Conferences |
container_volume |
403 |
container_start_page |
06017 |
_version_ |
1775347981134856192 |