Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?

Variations in the annual mean of the galactic cosmic ray flux (GCR) are compared with annual variations in the most common meteorological variables: temperature, mean sea-level barometric pressure, and precipitation statistics. A multiple regression analysis was used to explore the potential for a G...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Author: Rasmus E Benestad
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049
https://doaj.org/article/0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb 2023-09-05T13:21:34+02:00 Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays? Rasmus E Benestad 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049 https://doaj.org/article/0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb EN eng IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049 https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049 1748-9326 https://doaj.org/article/0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb Environmental Research Letters, Vol 8, Iss 3, p 035049 (2013) 92.70.Aa 92.70.Cp cosmic rays climate regression analysis temperature Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Science Q Physics QC1-999 article 2013 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049 2023-08-13T00:37:34Z Variations in the annual mean of the galactic cosmic ray flux (GCR) are compared with annual variations in the most common meteorological variables: temperature, mean sea-level barometric pressure, and precipitation statistics. A multiple regression analysis was used to explore the potential for a GCR response on timescales longer than a year and to identify ‘fingerprint’ patterns in time and space associated with GCR as well as greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The response pattern associated with GCR consisted of a negative temperature anomaly that was limited to parts of eastern Europe, and a weak anomaly in the sea-level pressure (SLP), but coincided with higher pressure over the Norwegian Sea. It had a similarity to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in the northern hemisphere and a wave train in the southern hemisphere. A set of Monte Carlo simulations nevertheless indicated that the weak amplitude of the global mean temperature response associated with GCR could easily be due to chance ( p -value = 0.6), and there has been no trend in the GCR. Hence, there is little empirical evidence that links GCR to the recent global warming. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic North Atlantic oscillation Norwegian Sea Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norwegian Sea Environmental Research Letters 8 3 035049
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic 92.70.Aa
92.70.Cp
cosmic rays
climate
regression analysis
temperature
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle 92.70.Aa
92.70.Cp
cosmic rays
climate
regression analysis
temperature
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Rasmus E Benestad
Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
topic_facet 92.70.Aa
92.70.Cp
cosmic rays
climate
regression analysis
temperature
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
description Variations in the annual mean of the galactic cosmic ray flux (GCR) are compared with annual variations in the most common meteorological variables: temperature, mean sea-level barometric pressure, and precipitation statistics. A multiple regression analysis was used to explore the potential for a GCR response on timescales longer than a year and to identify ‘fingerprint’ patterns in time and space associated with GCR as well as greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations and the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The response pattern associated with GCR consisted of a negative temperature anomaly that was limited to parts of eastern Europe, and a weak anomaly in the sea-level pressure (SLP), but coincided with higher pressure over the Norwegian Sea. It had a similarity to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in the northern hemisphere and a wave train in the southern hemisphere. A set of Monte Carlo simulations nevertheless indicated that the weak amplitude of the global mean temperature response associated with GCR could easily be due to chance ( p -value = 0.6), and there has been no trend in the GCR. Hence, there is little empirical evidence that links GCR to the recent global warming.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rasmus E Benestad
author_facet Rasmus E Benestad
author_sort Rasmus E Benestad
title Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
title_short Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
title_full Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
title_fullStr Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
title_full_unstemmed Are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
title_sort are there persistent physical atmospheric responses to galactic cosmic rays?
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049
https://doaj.org/article/0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb
geographic Norwegian Sea
geographic_facet Norwegian Sea
genre North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Norwegian Sea
genre_facet North Atlantic
North Atlantic oscillation
Norwegian Sea
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Vol 8, Iss 3, p 035049 (2013)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049
1748-9326
https://doaj.org/article/0b5bf07cecfa4c5e89cd0d6d7f6e89fb
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035049
container_title Environmental Research Letters
container_volume 8
container_issue 3
container_start_page 035049
_version_ 1776202164477100032