Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia

The industry of metatuff axes and adzes on the western coast of Onega Lake (Eneolithic period, ca. 3500 – 1500 cal. BC) allows assuming some sort of craft specialization. Excavations of a workshop site Fofanovo XIII, conducted in 2010-2011, provided an extremely large assemblage of artefacts (over 3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Lithic Studies
Main Authors: Alexey Tarasov, Sergey Stafeev
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.757
https://doaj.org/article/0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3 2023-10-01T03:55:54+02:00 Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia Alexey Tarasov Sergey Stafeev 2014-03-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.757 https://doaj.org/article/0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3 EN eng University of Edinburgh http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lithicstudies/article/view/757 https://doaj.org/toc/2055-0472 2055-0472 doi:10.2218/jls.v1i1.757 https://doaj.org/article/0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3 Journal of Lithic Studies, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 239-261 (2014) lithic technology neolithic eneolithic karelia fennoscandia stone axe adze gouge craft specialization mass-analysis image recognition Archaeology CC1-960 article 2014 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.757 2023-09-03T00:54:16Z The industry of metatuff axes and adzes on the western coast of Onega Lake (Eneolithic period, ca. 3500 – 1500 cal. BC) allows assuming some sort of craft specialization. Excavations of a workshop site Fofanovo XIII, conducted in 2010-2011, provided an extremely large assemblage of artefacts (over 350000 finds from just 30 m2, mostly production debitage). An attempt to estimate the output of production within the excavated area is based on experimental data from a series of replication experiments. Mass-analysis with the aid of image recognition software was used to obtain raw data from flakes from excavations and experiments. Statistical evaluation assures that the experimental results can be used as a basement for calculations. According to the proposed estimation, some 500 – 1000 tools could have been produced here, and this can be qualified as an evidence of “mass-production”. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fennoscandia Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Onega ENVELOPE(38.100,38.100,63.900,63.900) Journal of Lithic Studies 1 1
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic lithic technology
neolithic
eneolithic
karelia
fennoscandia
stone axe
adze
gouge
craft specialization
mass-analysis
image recognition
Archaeology
CC1-960
spellingShingle lithic technology
neolithic
eneolithic
karelia
fennoscandia
stone axe
adze
gouge
craft specialization
mass-analysis
image recognition
Archaeology
CC1-960
Alexey Tarasov
Sergey Stafeev
Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia
topic_facet lithic technology
neolithic
eneolithic
karelia
fennoscandia
stone axe
adze
gouge
craft specialization
mass-analysis
image recognition
Archaeology
CC1-960
description The industry of metatuff axes and adzes on the western coast of Onega Lake (Eneolithic period, ca. 3500 – 1500 cal. BC) allows assuming some sort of craft specialization. Excavations of a workshop site Fofanovo XIII, conducted in 2010-2011, provided an extremely large assemblage of artefacts (over 350000 finds from just 30 m2, mostly production debitage). An attempt to estimate the output of production within the excavated area is based on experimental data from a series of replication experiments. Mass-analysis with the aid of image recognition software was used to obtain raw data from flakes from excavations and experiments. Statistical evaluation assures that the experimental results can be used as a basement for calculations. According to the proposed estimation, some 500 – 1000 tools could have been produced here, and this can be qualified as an evidence of “mass-production”.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Alexey Tarasov
Sergey Stafeev
author_facet Alexey Tarasov
Sergey Stafeev
author_sort Alexey Tarasov
title Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia
title_short Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia
title_full Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia
title_fullStr Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the scale of stone axe production: A case study from Onega Lake, Russian Karelia
title_sort estimating the scale of stone axe production: a case study from onega lake, russian karelia
publisher University of Edinburgh
publishDate 2014
url https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.757
https://doaj.org/article/0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3
long_lat ENVELOPE(38.100,38.100,63.900,63.900)
geographic Onega
geographic_facet Onega
genre Fennoscandia
genre_facet Fennoscandia
op_source Journal of Lithic Studies, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 239-261 (2014)
op_relation http://journals.ed.ac.uk/lithicstudies/article/view/757
https://doaj.org/toc/2055-0472
2055-0472
doi:10.2218/jls.v1i1.757
https://doaj.org/article/0b4bb65ad1094522b030a1f152994de3
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.757
container_title Journal of Lithic Studies
container_volume 1
container_issue 1
_version_ 1778524759478239232