Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands

The introduction of carnivores to islands affects the conservation status of native prey. For two decades, American mink (Neogale vison) has expanded its distribution in the sub-Antarctic archipelago of Austral Patagonia, while preying on nests of solitary ground-nesting birds. Here, upland geese (C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Basic and Applied Ecology
Main Authors: Valeria Gómez-Silva, Ramiro D. Crego, Fabian M. Jaksic, Gabriela Flores-Brenner, Elke Schüttler
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007
https://doaj.org/article/09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456 2024-09-15T17:48:19+00:00 Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands Valeria Gómez-Silva Ramiro D. Crego Fabian M. Jaksic Gabriela Flores-Brenner Elke Schüttler 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007 https://doaj.org/article/09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456 EN eng Elsevier http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179124000306 https://doaj.org/toc/1439-1791 1439-1791 doi:10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007 https://doaj.org/article/09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456 Basic and Applied Ecology, Vol 78, Iss , Pp 14-22 (2024) American mink Cape Horn Chile Chloephaga picta Conservation Neogale vison Nest occupancy Ecology QH540-549.5 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007 2024-08-05T17:49:18Z The introduction of carnivores to islands affects the conservation status of native prey. For two decades, American mink (Neogale vison) has expanded its distribution in the sub-Antarctic archipelago of Austral Patagonia, while preying on nests of solitary ground-nesting birds. Here, upland geese (Chloephaga picta) and flightless steamer ducks (Tachyeres pteneres) are naïve to such predation risk because of the lack of native terrestrial predators. We used nest occupancy models to reveal preferred breeding habitats of those two ground-nesting waterbirds to prioritize areas for future mink control programs. We searched for nests along 80 transects on Navarino Island, southernmost Chile, and 11 transects on 10 nearby islets (3 ± 2.9 ha). Our results showed that islets were essential for breeding in comparison to the main island (5.3 nests/km versus 0.8 nests/km, respectively). The occupancy models revealed that islets were particularly important for flightless steamer ducks, endemic to western Patagonia. As breeding habitat, upland geese preferred medium-dense shrubland, and flightless steamer ducks preferred rocky coastlines. Nest detection was negatively affected by dense vegetation and, in the case of the upland geese, towards the end of the survey. Ten camera traps (n = 385 trap nights) revealed mink presence on all islets, highlighting their capacity to swim in cold water, up to 340 m distance from the main island. We conclude that islets represent breeding refuges for ground-nesting waterbirds and therefore advocate allocating resources for mink control during the warm season on islets. We also provide predictive maps of nesting habitat preference of upland geese and flightless steamer ducks for conservation managers to focus their often scarce human and financial resources on areas critical for breeding. Finally, we argue that detection probability should be an integral part of bird breeding studies, which can be methodologically achieved through targeting transects, not nests, as sample units. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Basic and Applied Ecology 78 14 22
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic American mink
Cape Horn
Chile
Chloephaga picta
Conservation
Neogale vison
Nest occupancy
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle American mink
Cape Horn
Chile
Chloephaga picta
Conservation
Neogale vison
Nest occupancy
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Valeria Gómez-Silva
Ramiro D. Crego
Fabian M. Jaksic
Gabriela Flores-Brenner
Elke Schüttler
Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
topic_facet American mink
Cape Horn
Chile
Chloephaga picta
Conservation
Neogale vison
Nest occupancy
Ecology
QH540-549.5
description The introduction of carnivores to islands affects the conservation status of native prey. For two decades, American mink (Neogale vison) has expanded its distribution in the sub-Antarctic archipelago of Austral Patagonia, while preying on nests of solitary ground-nesting birds. Here, upland geese (Chloephaga picta) and flightless steamer ducks (Tachyeres pteneres) are naïve to such predation risk because of the lack of native terrestrial predators. We used nest occupancy models to reveal preferred breeding habitats of those two ground-nesting waterbirds to prioritize areas for future mink control programs. We searched for nests along 80 transects on Navarino Island, southernmost Chile, and 11 transects on 10 nearby islets (3 ± 2.9 ha). Our results showed that islets were essential for breeding in comparison to the main island (5.3 nests/km versus 0.8 nests/km, respectively). The occupancy models revealed that islets were particularly important for flightless steamer ducks, endemic to western Patagonia. As breeding habitat, upland geese preferred medium-dense shrubland, and flightless steamer ducks preferred rocky coastlines. Nest detection was negatively affected by dense vegetation and, in the case of the upland geese, towards the end of the survey. Ten camera traps (n = 385 trap nights) revealed mink presence on all islets, highlighting their capacity to swim in cold water, up to 340 m distance from the main island. We conclude that islets represent breeding refuges for ground-nesting waterbirds and therefore advocate allocating resources for mink control during the warm season on islets. We also provide predictive maps of nesting habitat preference of upland geese and flightless steamer ducks for conservation managers to focus their often scarce human and financial resources on areas critical for breeding. Finally, we argue that detection probability should be an integral part of bird breeding studies, which can be methodologically achieved through targeting transects, not nests, as sample units.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Valeria Gómez-Silva
Ramiro D. Crego
Fabian M. Jaksic
Gabriela Flores-Brenner
Elke Schüttler
author_facet Valeria Gómez-Silva
Ramiro D. Crego
Fabian M. Jaksic
Gabriela Flores-Brenner
Elke Schüttler
author_sort Valeria Gómez-Silva
title Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
title_short Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
title_full Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
title_fullStr Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
title_full_unstemmed Understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
title_sort understanding ground-nesting habitat selection by waterbirds to prioritize invasive predator control on islands
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007
https://doaj.org/article/09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Basic and Applied Ecology, Vol 78, Iss , Pp 14-22 (2024)
op_relation http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179124000306
https://doaj.org/toc/1439-1791
1439-1791
doi:10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007
https://doaj.org/article/09d5490cf331444cb2983eddf245f456
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.007
container_title Basic and Applied Ecology
container_volume 78
container_start_page 14
op_container_end_page 22
_version_ 1810289465709559808