Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of...
Published in: | Land |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d 2024-09-15T18:39:32+00:00 Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS Cui Liu Chuanhua Li Liangliang Li 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/632 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445X doi:10.3390/land13050632 2073-445X https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d Land, Vol 13, Iss 5, p 632 (2024) climate warming carbon uptake LPJ-GUESS Alaska tundra Agriculture S article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 2024-08-05T17:49:20Z Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of the measured data from 2004 to 2008, and the results are significantly correlated, which proves that the model is reliable, with R 2 values of 0.51 and 0.46, respectively, for net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, and RMSE values of 22.85 and 23.40 gC/m 2 /yr for the tundra and needle forest sites, respectively. For the gross primary production (GPP), the R 2 values were 0.66 and 0.85, and the RMSE values were 39.25 and 43.75 gC/m 2 /yr at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, respectively. We simulated vegetation carbon exchanges for 1992–2014 and projected future exchanges for 2020–2100 using climate variables. Under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, GPP values increase with higher emissions, while the NEE showed great fluctuations without significant differences among the three pathways. Our results showed although climate warming can benefit vegetation growth, net carbon assimilation by vegetation may not increase accordingly in the future. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra Alaska Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Land 13 5 632 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
climate warming carbon uptake LPJ-GUESS Alaska tundra Agriculture S |
spellingShingle |
climate warming carbon uptake LPJ-GUESS Alaska tundra Agriculture S Cui Liu Chuanhua Li Liangliang Li Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS |
topic_facet |
climate warming carbon uptake LPJ-GUESS Alaska tundra Agriculture S |
description |
Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of the measured data from 2004 to 2008, and the results are significantly correlated, which proves that the model is reliable, with R 2 values of 0.51 and 0.46, respectively, for net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, and RMSE values of 22.85 and 23.40 gC/m 2 /yr for the tundra and needle forest sites, respectively. For the gross primary production (GPP), the R 2 values were 0.66 and 0.85, and the RMSE values were 39.25 and 43.75 gC/m 2 /yr at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, respectively. We simulated vegetation carbon exchanges for 1992–2014 and projected future exchanges for 2020–2100 using climate variables. Under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, GPP values increase with higher emissions, while the NEE showed great fluctuations without significant differences among the three pathways. Our results showed although climate warming can benefit vegetation growth, net carbon assimilation by vegetation may not increase accordingly in the future. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Cui Liu Chuanhua Li Liangliang Li |
author_facet |
Cui Liu Chuanhua Li Liangliang Li |
author_sort |
Cui Liu |
title |
Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS |
title_short |
Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS |
title_full |
Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS |
title_fullStr |
Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS |
title_sort |
climate warming benefits plant growth but not net carbon uptake: simulation of alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using lpj-guess |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d |
genre |
Tundra Alaska |
genre_facet |
Tundra Alaska |
op_source |
Land, Vol 13, Iss 5, p 632 (2024) |
op_relation |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/632 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445X doi:10.3390/land13050632 2073-445X https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 |
container_title |
Land |
container_volume |
13 |
container_issue |
5 |
container_start_page |
632 |
_version_ |
1810483901834985472 |