Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS

Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land
Main Authors: Cui Liu, Chuanhua Li, Liangliang Li
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024
Subjects:
S
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632
https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d 2024-09-15T18:39:32+00:00 Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS Cui Liu Chuanhua Li Liangliang Li 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d EN eng MDPI AG https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/632 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445X doi:10.3390/land13050632 2073-445X https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d Land, Vol 13, Iss 5, p 632 (2024) climate warming carbon uptake LPJ-GUESS Alaska tundra Agriculture S article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632 2024-08-05T17:49:20Z Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of the measured data from 2004 to 2008, and the results are significantly correlated, which proves that the model is reliable, with R 2 values of 0.51 and 0.46, respectively, for net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, and RMSE values of 22.85 and 23.40 gC/m 2 /yr for the tundra and needle forest sites, respectively. For the gross primary production (GPP), the R 2 values were 0.66 and 0.85, and the RMSE values were 39.25 and 43.75 gC/m 2 /yr at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, respectively. We simulated vegetation carbon exchanges for 1992–2014 and projected future exchanges for 2020–2100 using climate variables. Under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, GPP values increase with higher emissions, while the NEE showed great fluctuations without significant differences among the three pathways. Our results showed although climate warming can benefit vegetation growth, net carbon assimilation by vegetation may not increase accordingly in the future. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tundra Alaska Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Land 13 5 632
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic climate warming
carbon uptake
LPJ-GUESS
Alaska tundra
Agriculture
S
spellingShingle climate warming
carbon uptake
LPJ-GUESS
Alaska tundra
Agriculture
S
Cui Liu
Chuanhua Li
Liangliang Li
Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
topic_facet climate warming
carbon uptake
LPJ-GUESS
Alaska tundra
Agriculture
S
description Climate warming significantly impacts Arctic vegetation, yet its future role as a carbon sink or source is unclear. We analyzed vegetation growth and carbon exchange in Alaska’s tundra and needle leaf forests using the LPJ-GUESS model. The accuracy of the model is verified using linear regression of the measured data from 2004 to 2008, and the results are significantly correlated, which proves that the model is reliable, with R 2 values of 0.51 and 0.46, respectively, for net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, and RMSE values of 22.85 and 23.40 gC/m 2 /yr for the tundra and needle forest sites, respectively. For the gross primary production (GPP), the R 2 values were 0.66 and 0.85, and the RMSE values were 39.25 and 43.75 gC/m 2 /yr at the tundra and needle leaf forest sites, respectively. We simulated vegetation carbon exchanges for 1992–2014 and projected future exchanges for 2020–2100 using climate variables. Under SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, GPP values increase with higher emissions, while the NEE showed great fluctuations without significant differences among the three pathways. Our results showed although climate warming can benefit vegetation growth, net carbon assimilation by vegetation may not increase accordingly in the future.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cui Liu
Chuanhua Li
Liangliang Li
author_facet Cui Liu
Chuanhua Li
Liangliang Li
author_sort Cui Liu
title Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
title_short Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
title_full Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
title_fullStr Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
title_full_unstemmed Climate Warming Benefits Plant Growth but Not Net Carbon Uptake: Simulation of Alaska Tundra and Needle Leaf Forest Using LPJ-GUESS
title_sort climate warming benefits plant growth but not net carbon uptake: simulation of alaska tundra and needle leaf forest using lpj-guess
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632
https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d
genre Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Tundra
Alaska
op_source Land, Vol 13, Iss 5, p 632 (2024)
op_relation https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/5/632
https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445X
doi:10.3390/land13050632
2073-445X
https://doaj.org/article/05420aa340ec42719f1790340d9c690d
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050632
container_title Land
container_volume 13
container_issue 5
container_start_page 632
_version_ 1810483901834985472