Medium-Term Rainfall Forecasts Using Artificial Neural Networks with Monte-Carlo Cross-Validation and Aggregation for the Han River Basin, Korea

• Published in: Water
• Main Authors: Jeongwoo Lee, Chul-Gyum Kim, Jeong Eun Lee, Nam Won Kim, Hyeonjun Kim
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020
• Subjects: medium-term rainfall forecast; artificial neural network; Monte-Carlo cross-validation and aggregation; prediction uncertainty interval; Hydraulic engineering; TC1-978; Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes; TD201-500; Arctic; Pacific; North Atlantic; North Atlantic oscillation
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061743; https://doaj.org/article/050011d3d3f8472eb6450a83fedfa716

In this study, artificial neural network (ANN) models were constructed to predict the rainfall during May and June for the Han River basin, South Korea. This was achieved using the lagged global climate indices and historical rainfall data. Monte-Carlo cross-validation and aggregation (MCCVA) was applied to create an ensemble of forecasts. The input-output patterns were randomly divided into training, validation, and test datasets. This was done 100 times to achieve diverse data splitting. In each data splitting, ANN training was repeated 100 times using randomly assigned initial weight vectors of the network to construct 10,000 prediction ensembles and estimate their prediction uncertainty interval. The optimal ANN model that was used to forecast the monthly rainfall in May had 11 input variables of the lagged climate indices such as the Arctic Oscillation (AO), East Atlantic/Western Russia Pattern (EAWR), Polar/Eurasia Pattern (POL), Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO), Sahel Precipitation Index (SPI), and Western Pacific Index (WP). The ensemble of the rainfall forecasts exhibited the values of the averaged root mean squared error (RMSE) of 27.4, 33.6, and 39.5 mm, and the averaged correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.809, 0.725, and 0.641 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The estimated uncertainty band has covered 58.5% of observed rainfall data with an average band width of 50.0 mm, exhibiting acceptable results. The ANN forecasting model for June has 9 input variables, which differed from May, of the Atlantic Meridional Mode (AMM), East Pacific/North Pacific Oscillation (EPNP), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Scandinavia Pattern (SCAND), Equatorial Eastern Pacific SLP (SLP_EEP), and POL. The averaged RMSE values are 39.5, 46.1, and 62.1 mm, and the averaged CC values are 0.853, 0.771, and 0.683 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The estimated uncertainty band for June rainfall forecasts generally has a coverage of 67.9% with an average band width of 83.0 mm. It ...