Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities

Wet carbon (WC) ecosystems are a critical part of the carbon cycle, yet they are underrepresented in many policy and science communities due to the relative under-investment in stakeholder and boundary organizations. WC systems include the hydrosphere and carbon cycling systems that operate in wetla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Molly E Brown, Catherine Mitchell, Meghan Halabisky, Benjamin Gustafson, Helga do Rosario Gomes, Joaquim I Goes, Xuesong Zhang, Anthony D Campbell, Benjamin Poulter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023
Subjects:
Q
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208
https://doaj.org/article/0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730 2023-09-05T13:22:32+02:00 Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities Molly E Brown Catherine Mitchell Meghan Halabisky Benjamin Gustafson Helga do Rosario Gomes Joaquim I Goes Xuesong Zhang Anthony D Campbell Benjamin Poulter 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208 https://doaj.org/article/0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730 EN eng IOP Publishing https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208 https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ace208 1748-9326 https://doaj.org/article/0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730 Environmental Research Letters, Vol 18, Iss 8, p 084005 (2023) oceans wetlands mangroves submerged aquatic vegetation peatlands permafrost Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Science Q Physics QC1-999 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208 2023-08-13T00:36:51Z Wet carbon (WC) ecosystems are a critical part of the carbon cycle, yet they are underrepresented in many policy and science communities due to the relative under-investment in stakeholder and boundary organizations. WC systems include the hydrosphere and carbon cycling systems that operate in wetlands, oceans, rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, and permafrost. In this article, we provide evidence from a desk review of WC stakeholders, that includes individuals, groups or organizations that are affected by climate change, and utilize carbon data. These stakeholders are involved in decision-making processes in WC ecosystems, and can be private companies, non-governmental organizations, government agencies ranging in scope from local to federal, parastatals, international organizations, and more. In this paper, we identify and describe the links and interests of WC stakeholders and analyze the gaps between scientific understanding and information needs. A continued focus on WC systems could lead to increased stakeholder engagement and methodological and scientific progress. Our study revealed that stakeholder interest in WC systems was not primarily determined by its role in the carbon cycle, but rather by its significance for local policy, economics, or ecology. To bridge the gap between stakeholders and available WC data, we need improved communication of data availability and uncertainty, capacity building, engagement between stakeholder groups, and data continuity. Enhanced stakeholder engagement across various systems will facilitate greater utilization of carbon monitoring data derived from remote sensing; thereby creating more informed stakeholders as well as more effective decision-making processes. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Environmental Research Letters 18 8 084005
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic oceans
wetlands
mangroves
submerged aquatic vegetation
peatlands
permafrost
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle oceans
wetlands
mangroves
submerged aquatic vegetation
peatlands
permafrost
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
Molly E Brown
Catherine Mitchell
Meghan Halabisky
Benjamin Gustafson
Helga do Rosario Gomes
Joaquim I Goes
Xuesong Zhang
Anthony D Campbell
Benjamin Poulter
Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
topic_facet oceans
wetlands
mangroves
submerged aquatic vegetation
peatlands
permafrost
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Science
Q
Physics
QC1-999
description Wet carbon (WC) ecosystems are a critical part of the carbon cycle, yet they are underrepresented in many policy and science communities due to the relative under-investment in stakeholder and boundary organizations. WC systems include the hydrosphere and carbon cycling systems that operate in wetlands, oceans, rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, and permafrost. In this article, we provide evidence from a desk review of WC stakeholders, that includes individuals, groups or organizations that are affected by climate change, and utilize carbon data. These stakeholders are involved in decision-making processes in WC ecosystems, and can be private companies, non-governmental organizations, government agencies ranging in scope from local to federal, parastatals, international organizations, and more. In this paper, we identify and describe the links and interests of WC stakeholders and analyze the gaps between scientific understanding and information needs. A continued focus on WC systems could lead to increased stakeholder engagement and methodological and scientific progress. Our study revealed that stakeholder interest in WC systems was not primarily determined by its role in the carbon cycle, but rather by its significance for local policy, economics, or ecology. To bridge the gap between stakeholders and available WC data, we need improved communication of data availability and uncertainty, capacity building, engagement between stakeholder groups, and data continuity. Enhanced stakeholder engagement across various systems will facilitate greater utilization of carbon monitoring data derived from remote sensing; thereby creating more informed stakeholders as well as more effective decision-making processes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Molly E Brown
Catherine Mitchell
Meghan Halabisky
Benjamin Gustafson
Helga do Rosario Gomes
Joaquim I Goes
Xuesong Zhang
Anthony D Campbell
Benjamin Poulter
author_facet Molly E Brown
Catherine Mitchell
Meghan Halabisky
Benjamin Gustafson
Helga do Rosario Gomes
Joaquim I Goes
Xuesong Zhang
Anthony D Campbell
Benjamin Poulter
author_sort Molly E Brown
title Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
title_short Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
title_full Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
title_fullStr Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the NASA carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
title_sort assessment of the nasa carbon monitoring system wet carbon stakeholder community: data needs, gaps, and opportunities
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208
https://doaj.org/article/0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_source Environmental Research Letters, Vol 18, Iss 8, p 084005 (2023)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-9326
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ace208
1748-9326
https://doaj.org/article/0363afbe9d1740888e385ff4cb1ff730
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace208
container_title Environmental Research Letters
container_volume 18
container_issue 8
container_start_page 084005
_version_ 1776203055221440512