Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
Abstract Despite multiple advances in the understanding of the water cycle intensification in a warmer climate, climate models still diverge in their hydrological projections. Here we constrain annual runoff projections over individual and aggregated Arctic river basins. For this purpose, we use two...
Published in: | Geophysical Research Letters |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 2024-09-15T18:02:10+00:00 Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff Emma Dutot Hervé Douville 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 50, Iss 16, Pp n/a-n/a (2023) climate change Arctic runoff projections constraints uncertainties Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 2024-08-05T17:49:23Z Abstract Despite multiple advances in the understanding of the water cycle intensification in a warmer climate, climate models still diverge in their hydrological projections. Here we constrain annual runoff projections over individual and aggregated Arctic river basins. For this purpose, we use two ensembles of global climate models and two statistical methods: a regression scheme assuming similar runoff sensitivities at interannual versus climate change timescales, and a Bayesian method where models are used to derive a posterior runoff response conditioned on historical observations. While both techniques are shown to narrow model uncertainties, more or less substantially depending on rivers, the Bayesian method is less sensitive to the choice of the model ensemble and is more skillful when tested with synthetic observations. It has also been applied over the whole Arctic watershed, showing so far a limited narrowing of the inter‐model spread, but its skill will further improve with increasing climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper Climate change Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geophysical Research Letters 50 16 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
climate change Arctic runoff projections constraints uncertainties Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 |
spellingShingle |
climate change Arctic runoff projections constraints uncertainties Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 Emma Dutot Hervé Douville Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff |
topic_facet |
climate change Arctic runoff projections constraints uncertainties Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 |
description |
Abstract Despite multiple advances in the understanding of the water cycle intensification in a warmer climate, climate models still diverge in their hydrological projections. Here we constrain annual runoff projections over individual and aggregated Arctic river basins. For this purpose, we use two ensembles of global climate models and two statistical methods: a regression scheme assuming similar runoff sensitivities at interannual versus climate change timescales, and a Bayesian method where models are used to derive a posterior runoff response conditioned on historical observations. While both techniques are shown to narrow model uncertainties, more or less substantially depending on rivers, the Bayesian method is less sensitive to the choice of the model ensemble and is more skillful when tested with synthetic observations. It has also been applied over the whole Arctic watershed, showing so far a limited narrowing of the inter‐model spread, but its skill will further improve with increasing climate change. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Emma Dutot Hervé Douville |
author_facet |
Emma Dutot Hervé Douville |
author_sort |
Emma Dutot |
title |
Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff |
title_short |
Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff |
title_full |
Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff |
title_sort |
revisiting the potential to narrow model uncertainty in the projections of arctic runoff |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 |
genre |
Climate change |
genre_facet |
Climate change |
op_source |
Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 50, Iss 16, Pp n/a-n/a (2023) |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 |
container_title |
Geophysical Research Letters |
container_volume |
50 |
container_issue |
16 |
_version_ |
1810439470784184320 |