Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff

Abstract Despite multiple advances in the understanding of the water cycle intensification in a warmer climate, climate models still diverge in their hydrological projections. Here we constrain annual runoff projections over individual and aggregated Arctic river basins. For this purpose, we use two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Emma Dutot, Hervé Douville
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039
https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 2024-09-15T18:02:10+00:00 Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff Emma Dutot Hervé Douville 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2023GL104039 https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960 Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 50, Iss 16, Pp n/a-n/a (2023) climate change Arctic runoff projections constraints uncertainties Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2023 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039 2024-08-05T17:49:23Z Abstract Despite multiple advances in the understanding of the water cycle intensification in a warmer climate, climate models still diverge in their hydrological projections. Here we constrain annual runoff projections over individual and aggregated Arctic river basins. For this purpose, we use two ensembles of global climate models and two statistical methods: a regression scheme assuming similar runoff sensitivities at interannual versus climate change timescales, and a Bayesian method where models are used to derive a posterior runoff response conditioned on historical observations. While both techniques are shown to narrow model uncertainties, more or less substantially depending on rivers, the Bayesian method is less sensitive to the choice of the model ensemble and is more skillful when tested with synthetic observations. It has also been applied over the whole Arctic watershed, showing so far a limited narrowing of the inter‐model spread, but its skill will further improve with increasing climate change. Article in Journal/Newspaper Climate change Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Geophysical Research Letters 50 16
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic climate change
Arctic
runoff
projections
constraints
uncertainties
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle climate change
Arctic
runoff
projections
constraints
uncertainties
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Emma Dutot
Hervé Douville
Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
topic_facet climate change
Arctic
runoff
projections
constraints
uncertainties
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description Abstract Despite multiple advances in the understanding of the water cycle intensification in a warmer climate, climate models still diverge in their hydrological projections. Here we constrain annual runoff projections over individual and aggregated Arctic river basins. For this purpose, we use two ensembles of global climate models and two statistical methods: a regression scheme assuming similar runoff sensitivities at interannual versus climate change timescales, and a Bayesian method where models are used to derive a posterior runoff response conditioned on historical observations. While both techniques are shown to narrow model uncertainties, more or less substantially depending on rivers, the Bayesian method is less sensitive to the choice of the model ensemble and is more skillful when tested with synthetic observations. It has also been applied over the whole Arctic watershed, showing so far a limited narrowing of the inter‐model spread, but its skill will further improve with increasing climate change.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Emma Dutot
Hervé Douville
author_facet Emma Dutot
Hervé Douville
author_sort Emma Dutot
title Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
title_short Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
title_full Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
title_fullStr Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Potential to Narrow Model Uncertainty in the Projections of Arctic Runoff
title_sort revisiting the potential to narrow model uncertainty in the projections of arctic runoff
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039
https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960
genre Climate change
genre_facet Climate change
op_source Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 50, Iss 16, Pp n/a-n/a (2023)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039
https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276
https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007
1944-8007
0094-8276
doi:10.1029/2023GL104039
https://doaj.org/article/0357ab4f1b2a47079aa338c5d3a30960
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104039
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 50
container_issue 16
_version_ 1810439470784184320