Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study

Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Husban N, Elmuhtaseb MS, Al-Husban H, Nabhan M, Abuhalaweh H, Alkhatib YM, Yousef M, Aloran B, Elyyan Y, Alghazo A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c 2023-05-15T18:13:02+02:00 Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study Al-Husban N Elmuhtaseb MS Al-Husban H Nabhan M Abuhalaweh H Alkhatib YM Yousef M Aloran B Elyyan Y Alghazo A 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c EN eng Dove Medical Press https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-article-IJWH https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1411 1179-1411 https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c International Journal of Women's Health, Vol Volume 13, Pp 141-152 (2021) cesarean section spinal epidural general anesthesia feto-maternal outcome Gynecology and obstetrics RG1-991 article 2021 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T15:30:30Z Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Naser Al-HusbanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, P O Box 2194, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +962-772086080Fax +96264643217Email Husban48@yahoo.comBackground: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic cesarean section
spinal
epidural
general
anesthesia
feto-maternal
outcome
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
spellingShingle cesarean section
spinal
epidural
general
anesthesia
feto-maternal
outcome
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
Al-Husban N
Elmuhtaseb MS
Al-Husban H
Nabhan M
Abuhalaweh H
Alkhatib YM
Yousef M
Aloran B
Elyyan Y
Alghazo A
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
topic_facet cesarean section
spinal
epidural
general
anesthesia
feto-maternal
outcome
Gynecology and obstetrics
RG1-991
description Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Naser Al-HusbanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, P O Box 2194, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +962-772086080Fax +96264643217Email Husban48@yahoo.comBackground: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Al-Husban N
Elmuhtaseb MS
Al-Husban H
Nabhan M
Abuhalaweh H
Alkhatib YM
Yousef M
Aloran B
Elyyan Y
Alghazo A
author_facet Al-Husban N
Elmuhtaseb MS
Al-Husban H
Nabhan M
Abuhalaweh H
Alkhatib YM
Yousef M
Aloran B
Elyyan Y
Alghazo A
author_sort Al-Husban N
title Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
title_short Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
title_sort anesthesia for cesarean section: retrospective comparative study
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c
genre sami
genre_facet sami
op_source International Journal of Women's Health, Vol Volume 13, Pp 141-152 (2021)
op_relation https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-article-IJWH
https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1411
1179-1411
https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c
_version_ 1766185518945533952