Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study
Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospita...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c |
id |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c 2023-05-15T18:13:02+02:00 Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study Al-Husban N Elmuhtaseb MS Al-Husban H Nabhan M Abuhalaweh H Alkhatib YM Yousef M Aloran B Elyyan Y Alghazo A 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c EN eng Dove Medical Press https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-article-IJWH https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1411 1179-1411 https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c International Journal of Women's Health, Vol Volume 13, Pp 141-152 (2021) cesarean section spinal epidural general anesthesia feto-maternal outcome Gynecology and obstetrics RG1-991 article 2021 ftdoajarticles 2022-12-31T15:30:30Z Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Naser Al-HusbanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, P O Box 2194, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +962-772086080Fax +96264643217Email Husban48@yahoo.comBackground: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper sami Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles |
op_collection_id |
ftdoajarticles |
language |
English |
topic |
cesarean section spinal epidural general anesthesia feto-maternal outcome Gynecology and obstetrics RG1-991 |
spellingShingle |
cesarean section spinal epidural general anesthesia feto-maternal outcome Gynecology and obstetrics RG1-991 Al-Husban N Elmuhtaseb MS Al-Husban H Nabhan M Abuhalaweh H Alkhatib YM Yousef M Aloran B Elyyan Y Alghazo A Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
topic_facet |
cesarean section spinal epidural general anesthesia feto-maternal outcome Gynecology and obstetrics RG1-991 |
description |
Naser Al-Husban,1 Mohammad Sami Elmuhtaseb,1 Hedaieh Al-Husban,2 Mohammed Nabhan,3 Hamza Abuhalaweh,3 Yasmine Mohamed Alkhatib,3 Maysa Yousef,3 Bayan Aloran,3 Yousef Elyyan,3 Asma Alghazo3 1Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2Al-Noor Fertility Center, Eye Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, JordanCorrespondence: Naser Al-HusbanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, P O Box 2194, Amman, 11941, JordanTel +962-772086080Fax +96264643217Email Husban48@yahoo.comBackground: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery.Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-maternal outcomes.Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories).Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Al-Husban N Elmuhtaseb MS Al-Husban H Nabhan M Abuhalaweh H Alkhatib YM Yousef M Aloran B Elyyan Y Alghazo A |
author_facet |
Al-Husban N Elmuhtaseb MS Al-Husban H Nabhan M Abuhalaweh H Alkhatib YM Yousef M Aloran B Elyyan Y Alghazo A |
author_sort |
Al-Husban N |
title |
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_short |
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_full |
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_fullStr |
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study |
title_sort |
anesthesia for cesarean section: retrospective comparative study |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c |
genre |
sami |
genre_facet |
sami |
op_source |
International Journal of Women's Health, Vol Volume 13, Pp 141-152 (2021) |
op_relation |
https://www.dovepress.com/anesthesia-for-cesarean-section-retrospective-comparative-study-peer-reviewed-article-IJWH https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1411 1179-1411 https://doaj.org/article/031e9dc5bd4b4188a2b634415e06594c |
_version_ |
1766185518945533952 |