The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?

The Svalbard Treaty and its claimed ‘extended-reach’ jurisdiction incorporating both the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone (EEZ) – ie a fisheries protection zone (FPZ) – is an international law puzzle. Disputes regarding the Treaty’s jurisdictione ratione terrae results from interpretati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Main Author: Peter Thomas Orebech
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2017
Subjects:
Law
K
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287
https://doaj.org/article/01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395 2023-05-15T18:29:26+02:00 The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation? Peter Thomas Orebech 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287 https://doaj.org/article/01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395 EN eng University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/287 https://doaj.org/toc/1845-5662 https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9958 doi:10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287 1845-5662 1848-9958 https://doaj.org/article/01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Vol 13, Pp 53-86 (2017) svalbard treaty norway international law exclusive economic zone Law K Law of Europe KJ-KKZ article 2017 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287 2022-12-31T04:44:22Z The Svalbard Treaty and its claimed ‘extended-reach’ jurisdiction incorporating both the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone (EEZ) – ie a fisheries protection zone (FPZ) – is an international law puzzle. Disputes regarding the Treaty’s jurisdictione ratione terrae results from interpretative differences. My findings are as follows: the Treaty’s concept of ‘full and absolute sovereignty’ refers to the one-time jurisdiction transfer that occurred in April 1925. The notion of ‘territorial waters’ attracts both an historic (static) and evolutionary (dynamic) reading. Regarding its material content, we are faced with the first category. Considering geographic reach, evolutionary reading takes over. ‘Territorial water’ jurisdictione ratione terrae is a generic form whose reach, which is at most 12 nautical miles, is dynamic. The treaty does not prevent Norway from unilaterally deciding whether to enforce this maximum, or a less extensive, area. While territorial sea jurisdiction due to the development of international law may extend to 12 nautical miles, it cannot creep to 200 nautical miles. Due to substantial variations, the EEZ cannot qualify as a similar zone adjoining the territorial sea. Further; it is difficult to argue that its reach should include areas beyond the territorial sea of Svalbard due to the very fact that its reach is limited to the ‘Svalbard Box’. Coastal state jurisdiction beyond the Box is not granted in the Svalbard Treaty but results from the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC). Article in Journal/Newspaper Svalbard Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Norway Svalbard Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 13 13
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic svalbard treaty
norway
international law
exclusive economic zone
Law
K
Law of Europe
KJ-KKZ
spellingShingle svalbard treaty
norway
international law
exclusive economic zone
Law
K
Law of Europe
KJ-KKZ
Peter Thomas Orebech
The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?
topic_facet svalbard treaty
norway
international law
exclusive economic zone
Law
K
Law of Europe
KJ-KKZ
description The Svalbard Treaty and its claimed ‘extended-reach’ jurisdiction incorporating both the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone (EEZ) – ie a fisheries protection zone (FPZ) – is an international law puzzle. Disputes regarding the Treaty’s jurisdictione ratione terrae results from interpretative differences. My findings are as follows: the Treaty’s concept of ‘full and absolute sovereignty’ refers to the one-time jurisdiction transfer that occurred in April 1925. The notion of ‘territorial waters’ attracts both an historic (static) and evolutionary (dynamic) reading. Regarding its material content, we are faced with the first category. Considering geographic reach, evolutionary reading takes over. ‘Territorial water’ jurisdictione ratione terrae is a generic form whose reach, which is at most 12 nautical miles, is dynamic. The treaty does not prevent Norway from unilaterally deciding whether to enforce this maximum, or a less extensive, area. While territorial sea jurisdiction due to the development of international law may extend to 12 nautical miles, it cannot creep to 200 nautical miles. Due to substantial variations, the EEZ cannot qualify as a similar zone adjoining the territorial sea. Further; it is difficult to argue that its reach should include areas beyond the territorial sea of Svalbard due to the very fact that its reach is limited to the ‘Svalbard Box’. Coastal state jurisdiction beyond the Box is not granted in the Svalbard Treaty but results from the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Peter Thomas Orebech
author_facet Peter Thomas Orebech
author_sort Peter Thomas Orebech
title The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?
title_short The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?
title_full The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?
title_fullStr The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?
title_full_unstemmed The Geographic Scope of the Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty: Historic – or Evolutionary – Interpretation?
title_sort geographic scope of the svalbard treaty and norwegian sovereignty: historic – or evolutionary – interpretation?
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287
https://doaj.org/article/01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395
geographic Norway
Svalbard
geographic_facet Norway
Svalbard
genre Svalbard
genre_facet Svalbard
op_source Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Vol 13, Pp 53-86 (2017)
op_relation https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/287
https://doaj.org/toc/1845-5662
https://doaj.org/toc/1848-9958
doi:10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287
1845-5662
1848-9958
https://doaj.org/article/01ce8eda52be4ce197029067aa37f395
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.13.2017.287
container_title Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
container_volume 13
container_issue 13
_version_ 1766212463611609088