Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations

Abstract Freezing temperature parameterization significantly impacts the heat balance at sea‐ice bottom and, consequently, the simulated sea‐ice thickness. Here, the single‐column model ICEPACK was used to investigate the impact of the freezing temperature parameterization on the simulated sea‐ice t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Fengguan Gu, Frank Kauker, Qinghua Yang, Bo Han, Yongjie Fang, Changwei Liu
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281
https://doaj.org/article/0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137 2024-09-09T19:25:20+00:00 Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations Fengguan Gu Frank Kauker Qinghua Yang Bo Han Yongjie Fang Changwei Liu 2024-06-01T00:00:00Z https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281 https://doaj.org/article/0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137 EN eng Wiley https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281 https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276 https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007 1944-8007 0094-8276 doi:10.1029/2024GL108281 https://doaj.org/article/0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137 Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 51, Iss 12, Pp n/a-n/a (2024) Arctic sea ice freezing temperature MOSAiC oceanic heat flux sea‐ice thickness parameterization Geophysics. Cosmic physics QC801-809 article 2024 ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281 2024-08-05T17:49:07Z Abstract Freezing temperature parameterization significantly impacts the heat balance at sea‐ice bottom and, consequently, the simulated sea‐ice thickness. Here, the single‐column model ICEPACK was used to investigate the impact of the freezing temperature parameterization on the simulated sea‐ice thermodynamic growth during the MOSAiC expedition from October 2019 to September 2020. It is shown that large model errors exist with the standard parameterization and that different formulations for calculating the freezing temperature impact the simulated sea‐ice thickness significantly. Considering the winter mixed layer temperature, a modified parameterization of the freezing point temperature based on Mushy scheme was developed. The mean absolute error (ratio) of simulating sea‐ice thickness for all buoys reduces from 7.4 cm (4.9%) with the “Millero” scheme, which performs the best among the existing schemes in the ICEPACK model, to 4.2 cm (2.9%) with the new developed scheme. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Sea ice Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Arctic Geophysical Research Letters 51 12
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Arctic sea ice
freezing temperature
MOSAiC
oceanic heat flux
sea‐ice thickness
parameterization
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
spellingShingle Arctic sea ice
freezing temperature
MOSAiC
oceanic heat flux
sea‐ice thickness
parameterization
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
Fengguan Gu
Frank Kauker
Qinghua Yang
Bo Han
Yongjie Fang
Changwei Liu
Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations
topic_facet Arctic sea ice
freezing temperature
MOSAiC
oceanic heat flux
sea‐ice thickness
parameterization
Geophysics. Cosmic physics
QC801-809
description Abstract Freezing temperature parameterization significantly impacts the heat balance at sea‐ice bottom and, consequently, the simulated sea‐ice thickness. Here, the single‐column model ICEPACK was used to investigate the impact of the freezing temperature parameterization on the simulated sea‐ice thermodynamic growth during the MOSAiC expedition from October 2019 to September 2020. It is shown that large model errors exist with the standard parameterization and that different formulations for calculating the freezing temperature impact the simulated sea‐ice thickness significantly. Considering the winter mixed layer temperature, a modified parameterization of the freezing point temperature based on Mushy scheme was developed. The mean absolute error (ratio) of simulating sea‐ice thickness for all buoys reduces from 7.4 cm (4.9%) with the “Millero” scheme, which performs the best among the existing schemes in the ICEPACK model, to 4.2 cm (2.9%) with the new developed scheme.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Fengguan Gu
Frank Kauker
Qinghua Yang
Bo Han
Yongjie Fang
Changwei Liu
author_facet Fengguan Gu
Frank Kauker
Qinghua Yang
Bo Han
Yongjie Fang
Changwei Liu
author_sort Fengguan Gu
title Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations
title_short Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations
title_full Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations
title_fullStr Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Freezing Temperature Parameterization on Simulated Sea‐Ice Thickness Validated by MOSAiC Observations
title_sort effects of freezing temperature parameterization on simulated sea‐ice thickness validated by mosaic observations
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2024
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281
https://doaj.org/article/0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 51, Iss 12, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
op_relation https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281
https://doaj.org/toc/0094-8276
https://doaj.org/toc/1944-8007
1944-8007
0094-8276
doi:10.1029/2024GL108281
https://doaj.org/article/0175dca28c4d4f50ba036ae743c77137
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL108281
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 51
container_issue 12
_version_ 1809895071535857664