Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models

Subglacial hydrology models struggle to reproduce seasonal drainage patterns that are consistent with observed subglacial water pressures and surface velocities. We modify the standard sheet-flow parameterization within a coupled sheet–channel subglacial drainage model to smoothly transition between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Glaciology
Main Authors: Tim Hill, Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers, Matthew James Hoffman, Derek Bingham, Mauro Angelo Werder
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.103
https://doaj.org/article/011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b
id ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftdoajarticles:oai:doaj.org/article:011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b 2024-02-11T10:05:23+01:00 Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models Tim Hill Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers Matthew James Hoffman Derek Bingham Mauro Angelo Werder https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.103 https://doaj.org/article/011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b EN eng Cambridge University Press https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302300103X/type/journal_article https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430 https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652 doi:10.1017/jog.2023.103 0022-1430 1727-5652 https://doaj.org/article/011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b Journal of Glaciology, Pp 1-14 Glacier hydrology glacier modelling subglacial processes Environmental sciences GE1-350 Meteorology. Climatology QC851-999 article ftdoajarticles https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.103 2024-01-14T01:47:15Z Subglacial hydrology models struggle to reproduce seasonal drainage patterns that are consistent with observed subglacial water pressures and surface velocities. We modify the standard sheet-flow parameterization within a coupled sheet–channel subglacial drainage model to smoothly transition between laminar and turbulent flow based on the locally computed Reynolds number in a physically consistent way (the ‘transition’ model). We compare the transition model to standard laminar and turbulent models to assess the role of the sheet-flow parameterization in reconciling observed and modelled water pressures under idealized and realistic forcing. Relative to the turbulent model, the laminar and transition models improve seasonal simulations by increasing winter water pressure and producing a more prominent late-summer water pressure minimum. In contrast to the laminar model, the transition model remains consistent with its own internal assumptions across all flow regimes. Based on the internal consistency of the transition model and its improved performance relative to the standard turbulent model, we recommend its use for transient simulations of subglacial drainage. Article in Journal/Newspaper Journal of Glaciology Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles Journal of Glaciology 1 38
institution Open Polar
collection Directory of Open Access Journals: DOAJ Articles
op_collection_id ftdoajarticles
language English
topic Glacier hydrology
glacier modelling
subglacial processes
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
spellingShingle Glacier hydrology
glacier modelling
subglacial processes
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
Tim Hill
Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers
Matthew James Hoffman
Derek Bingham
Mauro Angelo Werder
Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
topic_facet Glacier hydrology
glacier modelling
subglacial processes
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Meteorology. Climatology
QC851-999
description Subglacial hydrology models struggle to reproduce seasonal drainage patterns that are consistent with observed subglacial water pressures and surface velocities. We modify the standard sheet-flow parameterization within a coupled sheet–channel subglacial drainage model to smoothly transition between laminar and turbulent flow based on the locally computed Reynolds number in a physically consistent way (the ‘transition’ model). We compare the transition model to standard laminar and turbulent models to assess the role of the sheet-flow parameterization in reconciling observed and modelled water pressures under idealized and realistic forcing. Relative to the turbulent model, the laminar and transition models improve seasonal simulations by increasing winter water pressure and producing a more prominent late-summer water pressure minimum. In contrast to the laminar model, the transition model remains consistent with its own internal assumptions across all flow regimes. Based on the internal consistency of the transition model and its improved performance relative to the standard turbulent model, we recommend its use for transient simulations of subglacial drainage.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tim Hill
Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers
Matthew James Hoffman
Derek Bingham
Mauro Angelo Werder
author_facet Tim Hill
Gwenn Elizabeth Flowers
Matthew James Hoffman
Derek Bingham
Mauro Angelo Werder
author_sort Tim Hill
title Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_short Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_full Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_fullStr Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_full_unstemmed Improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
title_sort improved representation of laminar and turbulent sheet flow in subglacial drainage models
publisher Cambridge University Press
url https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.103
https://doaj.org/article/011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b
genre Journal of Glaciology
genre_facet Journal of Glaciology
op_source Journal of Glaciology, Pp 1-14
op_relation https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302300103X/type/journal_article
https://doaj.org/toc/0022-1430
https://doaj.org/toc/1727-5652
doi:10.1017/jog.2023.103
0022-1430
1727-5652
https://doaj.org/article/011cf0ceb9bb441f8279ac8be948319b
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.103
container_title Journal of Glaciology
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 38
_version_ 1790602393990201344