Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements
The polar plasma convection originates from the interaction between the interplanetary magnetic field and the Earth’s magnetic field. To model the atmosphere-ionosphere system, the resulting polar electric potential is taken as an upper boundary condition using empirical convection models. These emp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Object |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2025
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elib.dlr.de/213311/ |
_version_ | 1835014025572777984 |
---|---|
author | Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig Liu, Hanli Liu, Huixin Stober, Gunter Lu, Gang Wu, Haonan McInerney, Joe Heymann, Frank Borries, Claudia |
author_facet | Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig Liu, Hanli Liu, Huixin Stober, Gunter Lu, Gang Wu, Haonan McInerney, Joe Heymann, Frank Borries, Claudia |
author_sort | Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig |
collection | Unknown |
description | The polar plasma convection originates from the interaction between the interplanetary magnetic field and the Earth’s magnetic field. To model the atmosphere-ionosphere system, the resulting polar electric potential is taken as an upper boundary condition using empirical convection models. These empirical models cannot represent short-term variations of the electric field which has been shown to cause a systematic underestimation of ionospheric Joule heating rates at high latitudes. Commonly, atmosphere-ionosphere models apply a Joule heating scaling factor for compensation. For example, a constant scaling factor of 1.5 is applied in the Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIE-GCM). We evaluate the accuracy of this constant scaling factor by comparing Joule heating rates calculated from the TIE-GCM with those estimated from measurements by the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar in Tromsø, Norway (69.6°N, 19.2°E). We investigate TIE-GCM runs driven with the Heelis, Weimer, and AMIE convection models, as well as WACCM-X model runs in standard and high resolution. We show that the required scaling factor varies significantly with geomagnetic activity, solar wind energy input, magnetic local time, and the applied plasma convection model. The impact of the spatial and temporal model resolution on the Joule heating rates is studied as well. |
format | Conference Object |
genre | EISCAT Tromsø |
genre_facet | EISCAT Tromsø |
geographic | Norway Tromsø |
geographic_facet | Norway Tromsø |
id | ftdlr:oai:elib.dlr.de:213311 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftdlr |
op_relation | https://elib.dlr.de/213311/1/2025-03-19_SWW.pdf Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig und Liu, Hanli und Liu, Huixin und Stober, Gunter und Lu, Gang und Wu, Haonan und McInerney, Joe und Heymann, Frank und Borries, Claudia (2025) Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements. Space Weather Workshop 2025, 2025-03-17 - 2025-03-21, Boulder, Colorado, USA. |
publishDate | 2025 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftdlr:oai:elib.dlr.de:213311 2025-06-15T14:26:15+00:00 Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig Liu, Hanli Liu, Huixin Stober, Gunter Lu, Gang Wu, Haonan McInerney, Joe Heymann, Frank Borries, Claudia 2025-03 application/pdf https://elib.dlr.de/213311/ en eng https://elib.dlr.de/213311/1/2025-03-19_SWW.pdf Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig und Liu, Hanli und Liu, Huixin und Stober, Gunter und Lu, Gang und Wu, Haonan und McInerney, Joe und Heymann, Frank und Borries, Claudia (2025) Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements. Space Weather Workshop 2025, 2025-03-17 - 2025-03-21, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Solar-Terrestrische Kopplungsprozesse Konferenzbeitrag NonPeerReviewed 2025 ftdlr 2025-06-04T04:58:10Z The polar plasma convection originates from the interaction between the interplanetary magnetic field and the Earth’s magnetic field. To model the atmosphere-ionosphere system, the resulting polar electric potential is taken as an upper boundary condition using empirical convection models. These empirical models cannot represent short-term variations of the electric field which has been shown to cause a systematic underestimation of ionospheric Joule heating rates at high latitudes. Commonly, atmosphere-ionosphere models apply a Joule heating scaling factor for compensation. For example, a constant scaling factor of 1.5 is applied in the Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIE-GCM). We evaluate the accuracy of this constant scaling factor by comparing Joule heating rates calculated from the TIE-GCM with those estimated from measurements by the EISCAT incoherent scatter radar in Tromsø, Norway (69.6°N, 19.2°E). We investigate TIE-GCM runs driven with the Heelis, Weimer, and AMIE convection models, as well as WACCM-X model runs in standard and high resolution. We show that the required scaling factor varies significantly with geomagnetic activity, solar wind energy input, magnetic local time, and the applied plasma convection model. The impact of the spatial and temporal model resolution on the Joule heating rates is studied as well. Conference Object EISCAT Tromsø Unknown Norway Tromsø |
spellingShingle | Solar-Terrestrische Kopplungsprozesse Günzkofer, Florian Ludwig Liu, Hanli Liu, Huixin Stober, Gunter Lu, Gang Wu, Haonan McInerney, Joe Heymann, Frank Borries, Claudia Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements |
title | Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements |
title_full | Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements |
title_fullStr | Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements |
title_short | Joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to EISCAT incoherent scatter radar measurements |
title_sort | joule heating scaling in thermosphere-ionosphere models compared to eiscat incoherent scatter radar measurements |
topic | Solar-Terrestrische Kopplungsprozesse |
topic_facet | Solar-Terrestrische Kopplungsprozesse |
url | https://elib.dlr.de/213311/ |